I'm in the mode of not acquiring fringe players anymore when it comes to picking up offensive talent. That's who Teo, Garver, Palanco are in my eyes...Big_Maple wrote: ↑Fri May 10, 2024 5:26 pmA few good points here. But I am still not sure that Tucker would be worth the cost - it would take quite a prospect haul to a division rival to land him, and I doubt the Stros would trade him anyway. Better for them to extend him in a year.Seattle or Bust wrote: ↑Fri May 10, 2024 4:55 pmI don't think Teo is anywhere near as talented as Tucker. A lefty bat is going to play much better at T-Mobile too.
If we are looking to deal away talent to get talent from division rivals, I would like to get Mason Miller from the A's. The dude is a total stud.
https://www.baseball-reference.com/play ... ma03.shtml
Move Munoz to the setup role. Munoz, Stanek and Miller?? Aye carumba.
This doesn't solve the offensive woes we have, but if we went for a blockbuster package that included Brent Rooker, it would make us serious contenders.
https://www.baseball-reference.com/play ... br01.shtml
I can't put together a trade proposal because baseballtradevalues now requires a subscription. It would likely involve moving a Miller or a Woo, but we could backfill one of those with Hancock and still have a great starting rotation.
BTW: I realize this is an insane proposal. The A's would be trading away 2 of their best players while they are starting their rebuild in preparation for their relocation. But there is some indication that Miller, at least, is drawing some interest. If the A's are listening, we should be speaking. Yelling, in fact.
https://www.mlbtraderumors.com/2024/05/ ... ntion.html
Teo and his career .804 OPS elevated by playing in an elite offense in Toronto and then being elevated again in playing in another elite offense.
Players who don't seem to have those issues in weaker offenses are guys who hit at elite levels in various areas and not on the fringes.