Who will win the presidential election
- seattlefan-daBronx
- Posts: 12607
- Joined: Wed May 01, 2019 9:37 pm
Re: Who will win the presidential election
https://conservativetoday.org/genius-pa ... tes-video/
For all of you math wiz people out there...but he actually keeps it pretty simple to follow.
The numbers don't lie...But people do. Oh my!
For all of you math wiz people out there...but he actually keeps it pretty simple to follow.
The numbers don't lie...But people do. Oh my!
Pronouns: Kiss/My/Ass
- seattlefan-daBronx
- Posts: 12607
- Joined: Wed May 01, 2019 9:37 pm
Re: Who will win the presidential election
She's awesome no doubt!D-train wrote: ↑Sat Nov 21, 2020 10:32 pmGod did not rest on the 7th day. He spent it creating the perfect woman.
https://twitter.com/govkristinoem/statu ... 1407289344
Pronouns: Kiss/My/Ass
- seattlefan-daBronx
- Posts: 12607
- Joined: Wed May 01, 2019 9:37 pm
Re: Who will win the presidential election
Nice!bpj wrote: ↑Sat Nov 21, 2020 11:30 pmDan Scavino giving us a briefing on the situation:
https://twitter.com/DanScavino/status/1 ... 27492?s=19
Daaaaaaaamn. It's go time
Pronouns: Kiss/My/Ass
- seattlefan-daBronx
- Posts: 12607
- Joined: Wed May 01, 2019 9:37 pm
Re: Who will win the presidential election
Nice!bpj wrote: ↑Sat Nov 21, 2020 11:30 pmDan Scavino giving us a briefing on the situation:
https://twitter.com/DanScavino/status/1 ... 27492?s=19
Daaaaaaaamn. It's go time
Pronouns: Kiss/My/Ass
- Donn Beach
- Posts: 13261
- Joined: Thu May 02, 2019 1:06 am
Re: Who will win the presidential election
So the Pennsylvania case tossed, well that sucks, helps if you have competent lawyers and a case to present
from the ruling
from the ruling
"This Court has been unable to find any case in which a plaintiff has sought such a drastic remedy in the contest of an election, in terms of the sheer volume of votes asked to be invalidated," Brann wrote in the 37-page decision.
"One might expect that when seeking such a startling outcome, a plaintiff would come formidably armed with compelling legal arguments and factual proof of rampant corruption, such that this Court would have no option but to regrettably grant the proposed injunctive relief," he wrote.
"That has not happened. Instead, this court has been presented with strained legal arguments without merit and speculative accusations, unpled ... and unsupported by evidence," Brann wrote. "In the United States of America, this cannot justify the disenfranchisement of a single voter, let alone all the voters of its sixth most populated state. Our people, laws, and institutions demand more."
- seattlefan-daBronx
- Posts: 12607
- Joined: Wed May 01, 2019 9:37 pm
Re: Who will win the presidential election
https://www.donaldjtrump.com/media/trum ... nia-ruling
Expected ruling. We all know where this is going.
Expected ruling. We all know where this is going.
Pronouns: Kiss/My/Ass
Re: Who will win the presidential election
Oh man its fun watching you bozos rush to what you think is a victory lap because you have no idea what is happening. What didn't you understand about the Supreme Court appointments being what matters?Donn Beach wrote: ↑Sun Nov 22, 2020 2:08 amSo the Pennsylvania case tossed, well that sucks, helps if you have competent lawyers and a case to present
from the ruling"This Court has been unable to find any case in which a plaintiff has sought such a drastic remedy in the contest of an election, in terms of the sheer volume of votes asked to be invalidated," Brann wrote in the 37-page decision.
"One might expect that when seeking such a startling outcome, a plaintiff would come formidably armed with compelling legal arguments and factual proof of rampant corruption, such that this Court would have no option but to regrettably grant the proposed injunctive relief," he wrote.
"That has not happened. Instead, this court has been presented with strained legal arguments without merit and speculative accusations, unpled ... and unsupported by evidence," Brann wrote. "In the United States of America, this cannot justify the disenfranchisement of a single voter, let alone all the voters of its sixth most populated state. Our people, laws, and institutions demand more."
- seattlefan-daBronx
- Posts: 12607
- Joined: Wed May 01, 2019 9:37 pm
Re: Who will win the presidential election
If you follow the Health Ranger you might listen to his podcast from 11/21.
Interesting take on how a special ops mission might be carried out to remove enemies of the Republic.
At first we won't even know when it's happening.
Internet goes down, limited phone service, curfew in effect.
Then it's survival mode, defend your home and family until order is restored.
https://www.brighteon.com/ce4a0246-e3a9 ... b683e137cb
Interesting take on how a special ops mission might be carried out to remove enemies of the Republic.
At first we won't even know when it's happening.
Internet goes down, limited phone service, curfew in effect.
Then it's survival mode, defend your home and family until order is restored.
https://www.brighteon.com/ce4a0246-e3a9 ... b683e137cb
Pronouns: Kiss/My/Ass
- HawkBowler 2.0
- Posts: 2286
- Joined: Sat Aug 10, 2019 6:22 pm
Re: Who will win the presidential election
At first we heard servers (plural) were captured, now a piece of hardware. Could just be a memory board of a single computer.Emerald Robinson wrote:BREAKING: a national security source confirms to me that “a piece of hardware has been secured” from Germany.
In any event, the good guys have evidence of the plot to steal the election.
Re: Who will win the presidential election
There have been several 'press conferences' where Joe Biden is speaking at a podium marked 'Office of the President elect".
There is no such office anywhere in the United Stated government.
Joe Biden has been in government for 47 years - he would know this.
If there was an "office of the President elect". wouldn't that office specifically know that the election has not been certified, thus Biden is not even technically the President elect? Wouldn't Biden know that too? It's all manufactured nonsense - and the press is going along with it.
Biden made a 'speech' at a podium for an office that doesn't even exist - which he knows. That is fucking creepy and disturbing.
It's almost like... they're trying to convince the general public of his legitimacy. Never seen anything like it. It all feels scripted.
The President just forced US drug makers to give favored nations status to US citizens for insulin, driving the prices down, making it more affordable for everyone. Joe didn't mention that from his 'Office of the President Elect" speech. WEIRD!
There is no such office anywhere in the United Stated government.
Joe Biden has been in government for 47 years - he would know this.
If there was an "office of the President elect". wouldn't that office specifically know that the election has not been certified, thus Biden is not even technically the President elect? Wouldn't Biden know that too? It's all manufactured nonsense - and the press is going along with it.
Biden made a 'speech' at a podium for an office that doesn't even exist - which he knows. That is fucking creepy and disturbing.
It's almost like... they're trying to convince the general public of his legitimacy. Never seen anything like it. It all feels scripted.
The President just forced US drug makers to give favored nations status to US citizens for insulin, driving the prices down, making it more affordable for everyone. Joe didn't mention that from his 'Office of the President Elect" speech. WEIRD!