Feedback is not the same as a response.
I'm not responding for this clown to learn anything from it.
I'm responding because his drone-ish responses are annoying. He's not taking anything away from it.
Feedback is not the same as a response.
I'm no general manager, but isn't trading a young, controllable pitcher for a 36 year old 1B who has -0.2 WAR this season and is batting below the Mendoza line not the upgrade you need "to take full control of the AL west"?tehmc wrote: ↑Tue May 14, 2024 5:06 pmTrade speculation articles are my favorite:
https://fansided.com/posts/cardinals-ma ... source=RSS
Not a trade. I wantBig_Maple wrote: ↑Tue May 14, 2024 5:41 pmI'm no general manager, but isn't trading a young, controllable pitcher for a 36 year old 1B who has -0.2 WAR this season and is batting below the Mendoza line not the upgrade you need "to take full control of the AL west"?tehmc wrote: ↑Tue May 14, 2024 5:06 pmTrade speculation articles are my favorite:
https://fansided.com/posts/cardinals-ma ... source=RSS
I just don't know how people who profess to wanting to be sports writers can have so little understanding of accurate trade value. Here's the short of it: Goldschmidt has NONE.tehmc wrote: ↑Tue May 14, 2024 5:06 pmTrade speculation articles are my favorite:
https://fansided.com/posts/cardinals-ma ... source=RSS
Well yeah, but even if Goldschmidt had 10 homers, was hitting .300, and had a .850 OPS... they still wouldn't get Woo in return for 3 months of a 36 year old 1B making $26 million.Lamda wrote: ↑Tue May 14, 2024 8:45 pmWell their theory is that by the deadline Goldy will be back to form regaining some trade value - but not to the extent that they are hoping, lol. We would never trade Woo for that guy. We might trade him or Hancock for Alonso but that would be the only player I see doing that for.