M's trade for Randy Arozarena
- seattlefan-daBronx
- Posts: 13459
- Joined: Wed May 01, 2019 9:37 pm
Re: M's trade for Randy Arozarena
Randy is a solid bat. He's NOT our savior and answer to this abysmal offense BUT it's a start Jerry. Thank you.
NOW go get a Rooker or Robert and then we'll start talking about saving your job.
But today we have HOPE.
At least it'll mean less watching at-bats for Haniger or Garver for God's sake.
NOW go get a Rooker or Robert and then we'll start talking about saving your job.
But today we have HOPE.
At least it'll mean less watching at-bats for Haniger or Garver for God's sake.
Pronouns: Kiss/My/Ass
-
- Posts: 2932
- Joined: Mon May 06, 2019 9:23 pm
Re: M's trade for Randy Arozarena
Went back and looked at Arozarena's past game logs to see if this slow start and then catching on fire is normal for him. It appears to be his MO to either be very hot or very cold.
2021
Games 1-41 .829 OPS
Games 42-85 .610 OPS
Games 86-106 1.235 OPS
Games 107-132 .687 OPS
Games 133-141 .957 OPS
2022
Games 1-25 .559 OPS
Games 26-58 .914 OPS
Games 59-86 .632 OPS
Games 87-123 .971 OPS
Games 124-153 .690 OPS
2023
Games 1-31 1.015 OPS
Games 32-59 .701 OPS
Games 60-74 1.064 OPS
Games 75-119 .577 OPS
Games 120-129 1.147 OPS
Games 130-151 .662 OPS
2021
Games 1-41 .829 OPS
Games 42-85 .610 OPS
Games 86-106 1.235 OPS
Games 107-132 .687 OPS
Games 133-141 .957 OPS
2022
Games 1-25 .559 OPS
Games 26-58 .914 OPS
Games 59-86 .632 OPS
Games 87-123 .971 OPS
Games 124-153 .690 OPS
2023
Games 1-31 1.015 OPS
Games 32-59 .701 OPS
Games 60-74 1.064 OPS
Games 75-119 .577 OPS
Games 120-129 1.147 OPS
Games 130-151 .662 OPS
- seattlefan-daBronx
- Posts: 13459
- Joined: Wed May 01, 2019 9:37 pm
Re: M's trade for Randy Arozarena
We've been in talks about Jazz with Miami and have made trades recently with SF.
What about Michael Conforto???
We just need LEAGUE AVERAGE / 3-4 runs / game!!!
What about Michael Conforto???
We just need LEAGUE AVERAGE / 3-4 runs / game!!!
Pronouns: Kiss/My/Ass
Re: M's trade for Randy Arozarena
Looks like a guy who the leagues pitchers have figured out.
Much like half the M's existing roster.
Much like half the M's existing roster.
Re: M's trade for Randy Arozarena
Personally I think most players are hot and cold. That's why they need to be in the lineup consistently, so the hot times come back.Captain 97 wrote: ↑Fri Jul 26, 2024 3:40 pmThat's great but that just means that he was really terrible before that and has issues with consistency. Gotta wonder if he is due for another cold streak. The Mariner curse, the Marine Layer and the crooked batters eye seem to have a way of getting guys off their game.bpj wrote: ↑Fri Jul 26, 2024 5:31 amHe does have a .919 OPS since June 1st with a .290 avg in that time.Captain 97 wrote: ↑Fri Jul 26, 2024 5:20 amDude is hitting .211 with a 29%K rate. He will fit right in.
And why when it's all said and done, it's about the full years stats.
Our problem has been that we don't have enough guys with hot streaks. Part of it, if you ask me, is inconsistent playing time. The more of these types we can add the better because one hot streak at a time can carry a team imo.
Re: M's trade for Randy Arozarena
A review of the trade from The Athletic columnist Stephen J. Nesbitt:
Nesbitt and fellow Athletic columnist Tim Britton gave the Mariners grades of A on the trade.
https://www.nytimes.com/athletic/566031 ... ners-rays/Waking up to the trade news this morning, my initial reaction was there’s no way the Rays accelerated the Arozarena market without that PTBNL being someone of significance. Smith and Hopkins are ranked 14th and 15th, respectively, in the Mariners system by Baseball America. They’ve both put up big numbers so far this season in A-ball. They’re nice prospects acing their level. But PTBNL, man, I bet that guy can really play ball. Let me remind you that the Rays once traded Chris Archer for Tyler Glasnow, Austin Meadows and a PTBNL that was announced, a few weeks later, as Shane Baz, the Pirates’ first-round pick from the previous year. Does that mean this PTBNL is Colt Emerson, Seattle’s first-round pick last year? Absolutely not. Keith Law just ranked that dude the No. 5 prospect in baseball. But I’m betting the Rays’ return will look considerably better when the third player is announced, and the grade reflects that.
Nesbitt and fellow Athletic columnist Tim Britton gave the Mariners grades of A on the trade.
Re: M's trade for Randy Arozarena
Is it someone they just drafted? Could it maybe be Farmelo or Celestin and they want a physical?harmony wrote: ↑Fri Jul 26, 2024 11:19 pmA review of the trade from The Athletic columnist Stephen J. Nesbitt:https://www.nytimes.com/athletic/566031 ... ners-rays/Waking up to the trade news this morning, my initial reaction was there’s no way the Rays accelerated the Arozarena market without that PTBNL being someone of significance. Smith and Hopkins are ranked 14th and 15th, respectively, in the Mariners system by Baseball America. They’ve both put up big numbers so far this season in A-ball. They’re nice prospects acing their level. But PTBNL, man, I bet that guy can really play ball. Let me remind you that the Rays once traded Chris Archer for Tyler Glasnow, Austin Meadows and a PTBNL that was announced, a few weeks later, as Shane Baz, the Pirates’ first-round pick from the previous year. Does that mean this PTBNL is Colt Emerson, Seattle’s first-round pick last year? Absolutely not. Keith Law just ranked that dude the No. 5 prospect in baseball. But I’m betting the Rays’ return will look considerably better when the third player is announced, and the grade reflects that.
Nesbitt and fellow Athletic columnist Tim Britton gave the Mariners grades of A on the trade.
The poster formerly known as Kingfelixk. With a new forum comes a new boardname. Julio is my guy, plus we share a birthday, so that's Culiooooo
Adopt a Mariner-Julio Rodriguez
Adopt a Mariner-Julio Rodriguez
Re: M's trade for Randy Arozarena
It is not supposed to be anyone higher than Aiden SmithJuliooooo wrote: ↑Fri Jul 26, 2024 11:35 pmIs it someone they just drafted? Could it maybe be Farmelo or Celestin and they want a physical?harmony wrote: ↑Fri Jul 26, 2024 11:19 pmA review of the trade from The Athletic columnist Stephen J. Nesbitt:https://www.nytimes.com/athletic/566031 ... ners-rays/Waking up to the trade news this morning, my initial reaction was there’s no way the Rays accelerated the Arozarena market without that PTBNL being someone of significance. Smith and Hopkins are ranked 14th and 15th, respectively, in the Mariners system by Baseball America. They’ve both put up big numbers so far this season in A-ball. They’re nice prospects acing their level. But PTBNL, man, I bet that guy can really play ball. Let me remind you that the Rays once traded Chris Archer for Tyler Glasnow, Austin Meadows and a PTBNL that was announced, a few weeks later, as Shane Baz, the Pirates’ first-round pick from the previous year. Does that mean this PTBNL is Colt Emerson, Seattle’s first-round pick last year? Absolutely not. Keith Law just ranked that dude the No. 5 prospect in baseball. But I’m betting the Rays’ return will look considerably better when the third player is announced, and the grade reflects that.
Nesbitt and fellow Athletic columnist Tim Britton gave the Mariners grades of A on the trade.
Re: M's trade for Randy Arozarena
When has the PTBNL been the highest graded player of any deal when that deal was consummated? Answer is never. That's not how a PTBNL works. They guys is a PTBNL because it's one of 3-5 guys usually for club A to watch and then decide on a few months later (pre-determined deadline set by club b)
It won't be anybody better than Hopkins regardless of what some dude at the Athletic thinks.
It won't be anybody better than Hopkins regardless of what some dude at the Athletic thinks.
Re: M's trade for Randy Arozarena
https://www.mlb.com/news/best-players-t ... ll-historyVogelbomb wrote: ↑Sat Jul 27, 2024 12:18 amWhen has the PTBNL been the highest graded player of any deal when that deal was consummated? Answer is never. That's not how a PTBNL works. They guys is a PTBNL because it's one of 3-5 guys usually for club A to watch and then decide on a few months later (pre-determined deadline set by club b)
It won't be anybody better than Hopkins regardless of what some dude at the Athletic thinks.