Gotta trade one of Woo or Miller this off season for a bat.
Correlation between wins and payroll in 2023
-
- Posts: 8532
- Joined: Wed Mar 09, 2022 7:09 pm
Re: Correlation between wins and payroll in 2023
Why not just trade one of the four SS prospects.Seattle or Bust wrote: ↑Wed Sep 27, 2023 3:40 amGotta trade one of Woo or Miller this off season for a bat.
dt
Re: Correlation between wins and payroll in 2023
We have ZERO SP depth. Even if we sign a FA after trading we will still be screwed after the first injury. Trade one or two of our top 10 prospects.
dt
Re: Correlation between wins and payroll in 2023
In my opinion, because they can sign free agent pitching to replace anything we lose in trade. They seem to have trouble drawing bats, whether it's weak offers or fear of T-Mobile.D-train wrote: ↑Wed Sep 27, 2023 3:41 amWhy not just trade one of the four SS prospects.Seattle or Bust wrote: ↑Wed Sep 27, 2023 3:40 amGotta trade one of Woo or Miller this off season for a bat.
So imo they need to keep as many bats in the system as possible because only a small portion of them will work out, and we need the ones that do to still be here.
Even Marco Gonzales can masquerade as a decent pitcher in Seattle, we just need to score some runs.
Re: Correlation between wins and payroll in 2023
There is a trend but I don't know. If you didn't give any credit to payroll and you guessed 81 wins, then you'd be within +/= 20 wins, 90% of the time, with an average error of, I don't know say 8 wins?D-train wrote: ↑Tue Sep 26, 2023 9:33 pmI created two graphs. Even if you keep the 5 outliers in there. (Yankees, Mets and Padres were all good last season) the trend line of wins is negative as you lower payroll. A very clear correlation. If you remove the outliers the trends is even more blatant.
pr graph w.JPG
There seems to be trend line but what is the average error from the line? It seems quite a bit.
Re: Correlation between wins and payroll in 2023
Right, I just don't trust them to replace Miller or Woo with a better or even equal option.bpj wrote: ↑Wed Sep 27, 2023 3:56 amIn my opinion, because they can sign free agent pitching to replace anything we lose in trade. They seem to have trouble drawing bats, whether it's weak offers or fear of T-Mobile.D-train wrote: ↑Wed Sep 27, 2023 3:41 amWhy not just trade one of the four SS prospects.Seattle or Bust wrote: ↑Wed Sep 27, 2023 3:40 am
Gotta trade one of Woo or Miller this off season for a bat.
So imo they need to keep as many bats in the system as possible because only a small portion of them will work out, and we need the ones that do to still be here.
Even Marco Gonzales can masquerade as a decent pitcher in Seattle, we just need to score some runs.
dt
Re: Correlation between wins and payroll in 2023
There is clearly a lot of movement around the trend but it is enough of a trend to conclude that you are not going decrease your likely win total by spending more like many on twitter argue.ice99 wrote: ↑Wed Sep 27, 2023 6:01 amThere is a trend but I don't know. If you didn't give any credit to payroll and you guessed 81 wins, then you'd be within +/= 20 wins, 90% of the time, with an average error of, I don't know say 8 wins?D-train wrote: ↑Tue Sep 26, 2023 9:33 pmI created two graphs. Even if you keep the 5 outliers in there. (Yankees, Mets and Padres were all good last season) the trend line of wins is negative as you lower payroll. A very clear correlation. If you remove the outliers the trends is even more blatant.
pr graph w.JPG
There seems to be trend line but what is the average error from the line? It seems quite a bit.
dt
Re: Correlation between wins and payroll in 2023
I get it, I just don't see them as hard to replace. At all.D-train wrote: ↑Wed Sep 27, 2023 11:04 amRight, I just don't trust them to replace Miller or Woo with a better or even equal option.bpj wrote: ↑Wed Sep 27, 2023 3:56 amIn my opinion, because they can sign free agent pitching to replace anything we lose in trade. They seem to have trouble drawing bats, whether it's weak offers or fear of T-Mobile.
So imo they need to keep as many bats in the system as possible because only a small portion of them will work out, and we need the ones that do to still be here.
Even Marco Gonzales can masquerade as a decent pitcher in Seattle, we just need to score some runs.
Miller and Woo have ERA'S of 4.17 and 4.39.
Even Meatball Marco in 2021 and 2022 had ERA'S of 3.96 and 4.13.
-
- Posts: 3210
- Joined: Mon May 06, 2019 9:23 pm
Re: Correlation between wins and payroll in 2023
Gonzalez is supposed to be ready in the spring and theoretically Robbie Ray could come back some time towards the end of next season. Not sure what Hancock status is but he should be in the mix at some point too. I think there is enough depth where they could afford to trade off Woo or Miller especially if they go out and sign a Free agent pitcher.
-
- Posts: 3210
- Joined: Mon May 06, 2019 9:23 pm
Re: Correlation between wins and payroll in 2023
I really don't put much stock in the trade values site but they have Miller valued at 20.2 and Woo at 25.2. Pete Alonso is at 16.6 and Soto is at 21.8. Theoretically you could trade Woo and change for Soto and Miller and Change for Alonso. Resign Teoscar and Go out and sign Sonny Gray and you have a rotation of...
1. Kirby
2 Castillo
3. Gray
4. Gilbert
5. Hancock/Gonzalez/ Ray
and a Lineup of
1. JP SS
2. Julio CF
3. Soto RF
4. Alonso 1B
5. Teo LF
6. Suarez 3b
6. Raleigh C
8. France/Murphy/Ford DH
9. Rojas/ Moore / Caballero 2b
Obviously this is just some rosterbation but following a strategy something like this would be a good template in my opinion.
1. Kirby
2 Castillo
3. Gray
4. Gilbert
5. Hancock/Gonzalez/ Ray
and a Lineup of
1. JP SS
2. Julio CF
3. Soto RF
4. Alonso 1B
5. Teo LF
6. Suarez 3b
6. Raleigh C
8. France/Murphy/Ford DH
9. Rojas/ Moore / Caballero 2b
Obviously this is just some rosterbation but following a strategy something like this would be a good template in my opinion.