I'm not really sure if it matters if he's the best hitting prospect seen in years. It appears to be a weaker draft. He's supposedly got a higher ceiling than his brother with the bat. And his brother has a career .928 OPS in the minors which is hardly something to shake a stick at.GL_Storm wrote: ↑Sun Apr 20, 2025 5:05 amFrom what I've read about him, it seems unlikely he'll stick at 3rd. He's already big and he'll probably thicken out some. He's more likely a first baseman or corner outfielder, which isn't special positionally. And so the question is: how special is the bat? And what I've read about him so far is that everyone likes him and he's a good hitting prospect, but not so much that he's head and shoulders above all the rest. Nobody (so far) seems to think he's the best hitting prospect they've seen in years. But maybe that will emerge over the next few months, which is what happened with his brother.Seattle or Bust wrote: ↑Sun Apr 20, 2025 4:16 amYou can't draft a third baseman? Didn't the M's do exactly that with Colt Emerson?GL_Storm wrote: ↑Sun Apr 20, 2025 3:21 am
I've been expecting Ethan Holliday to drop and maybe he still will. It's not that there's anything especially wrong with him, but I've not heard anything yet to make me think he belongs at the top of the draft. Positionally, there's no way he's a shortstop in the pros, so is he a third baseman? It's probably more likely that he isn't. So what you're drafting is a bat, and if you're drafting a bat that high, it needs to be special, more special than just having the name Holliday and being an advanced high school level bat. I have no doubt he's a good hitting prospect, but is he truly special?
How is his bat not special? According to Joe Doyle, he was hitting over .600 with 8 homers in 16 games on April 8th.
If the concern is contact, we drafted a guy who was supposed to be an elite contact hitter. His name is Cole Young. Scouts grade him as a 60 hit tool. He is currently hitting .225 as a near 22 year old in AAA. He hasn't hit .300 since his rookie-ball days over 34 games.
I'd prefer Laviolete personally b/c he'd be closer to the majors. Since the first posts on this thread, he's drastically reduced his K rate. But I wouldn't be upset with Holliday.
The pitching prospects seem a little underwhelming. Arnold only features a 2-pitch mix and he's 93-95... he'd be a little more compelling if he could throw 96-98 cause then he'd be Sale like with how good the slider is.