Naylor needs to be a slugger again for it to be a "problem"Donn Beach wrote: ↑Thu Apr 16, 2026 1:21 amYeah, it's the kind of problem you want to have. Heaven forbid they have too many sluggers
2026 Prospects Thread
Re: 2026 Prospects Thread
dt
-
Donn Beach
- Posts: 19773
- Joined: Thu May 02, 2019 1:06 am
Re: 2026 Prospects Thread
Naylors underlying numbers at least seem positive. I was just thinking the only real issue I have is with Cal. The article you posted about his metrics
Re: 2026 Prospects Thread
Yeah that was SCARY. How does that happen going from 60 bombs to that at age 29.Donn Beach wrote: ↑Mon Apr 20, 2026 2:44 pmNaylors underlying numbers at least seem positive. I was just thinking the only real issue I have is with Cal. The article you posted about his metrics
dt
-
Donn Beach
- Posts: 19773
- Joined: Thu May 02, 2019 1:06 am
Re: 2026 Prospects Thread
Yeah, we still search for answers. I really don't buy the age thing. To a certain extent in terms of diminishing performance over the life of a contract. But the falling off a cliff stuff I don't buy. Because a guy is six months older he suddenly can no longer hit a baseball. Its convenient but I'm still stuck with the why.D-train wrote: ↑Mon Apr 20, 2026 3:14 pmYeah that was SCARY. How does that happen going from 60 bombs to that at age 29.Donn Beach wrote: ↑Mon Apr 20, 2026 2:44 pmNaylors underlying numbers at least seem positive. I was just thinking the only real issue I have is with Cal. The article you posted about his metrics
-
Donn Beach
- Posts: 19773
- Joined: Thu May 02, 2019 1:06 am
Re: 2026 Prospects Thread
Yeah, we still search for answers. I really don't buy the age thing. To a certain extent in terms of diminishing performance over the life of a contract. But the falling off a cliff stuff I don't buy. Because a guy is six months older he suddenly can no longer hit a baseball. Its convenient but I'm still stuck with the why.D-train wrote: ↑Mon Apr 20, 2026 3:14 pmYeah that was SCARY. How does that happen going from 60 bombs to that at age 29.Donn Beach wrote: ↑Mon Apr 20, 2026 2:44 pmNaylors underlying numbers at least seem positive. I was just thinking the only real issue I have is with Cal. The article you posted about his metrics