Having an "ownership group" is exactly what I'd bet our problem is.GL_Storm wrote: ↑Fri Feb 16, 2024 10:20 pmThe thing is the ownership group is a partnership and we don't even know for sure that Stanton has the largest stake in the team. But none of the owners, as far as I know, are so rich that losses from their investment in the team don't matter the same way they don't matter to the wealthiest owners in the game. And I think a few of the owners are relative small fry, where losses and a capital call really would matter.Donn Beach wrote: ↑Fri Feb 16, 2024 7:06 pmYou say a billionaire owner, isn't he a bit under a billion? And ohtani, a single player signed for almost half his net worth. Think about it, that seems kinda incredible to me, modern baseball economics. I don't know if it's so much being cheap as being cautiousCoeurd’Alene J wrote: ↑Fri Feb 16, 2024 2:57 pm
And if this year and the next 2-3 we end up saving our payroll and never experience a deep playoff run and never extend any of the young core with a billionaire Owner who cares more about his balance sheet than hoisting a trophy…………………………………………….
There's not one guy that can give a yes or no.
If they need $30M more for payroll, do they have to get each owner to kick in their share as a % of what they own? I can see why that would never work.
None of the majority owners are going to kick in all of the money on their own if it doesn't increase their % of ownership or benefit them in some other way.
It seems like they're in a position where they have to work within the budget that the revenue allows.