The slightly too early trade deadline thread

Gametime
Posts: 4078
Joined: Sun Sep 08, 2019 9:19 pm

Re: The slightly too early trade deadline thread

Post by Gametime » Mon Jun 05, 2023 3:40 am

Donn Beach wrote:
Sun Jun 04, 2023 7:23 pm
You don't think Teo was an above average hitter when they signed him? The guy has won a pair of silver sluggers. I was pretty happy with that signing.
Not signed. Traded for.

Swanson and our 13th prospect Macko for Teo for 1 year.

Gametime
Posts: 4078
Joined: Sun Sep 08, 2019 9:19 pm

Re: The slightly too early trade deadline thread

Post by Gametime » Mon Jun 05, 2023 3:46 am

Arguing wong and teo vs Hanniger and Frazier is pretty bad. Really a wash. No real money spent this off season

This team has two things going against it. An owner who loves profit and not winning. And Dipoto wants everybody to think how great and creative he is over everybody else. Then we wonder why we are basically the same.

It is what it is. The Mariner way.

User avatar
Juliooooo
Posts: 11462
Joined: Wed May 01, 2019 4:38 am
Location: Pdx

Re: The slightly too early trade deadline thread

Post by Juliooooo » Mon Jun 05, 2023 3:59 am

Gametime wrote:
Mon Jun 05, 2023 3:46 am
Arguing wong and teo vs Hanniger and Frazier is pretty bad. Really a wash. No real money spent this off season

This team has two things going against it. An owner who loves profit and not winning. And Dipoto wants everybody to think how great and creative he is over everybody else. Then we wonder why we are basically the same.

It is what it is. The Mariner way.
Yep, they replaced those 2, lost Winker (while not great, he still managed to hit a little and get on base, and was at least an average hitter, better than Teo is now) and Santana (didn’t hit a lot, but was at least clutch).
The poster formerly known as Kingfelixk. With a new forum comes a new boardname. Julio is my guy, plus we share a birthday, so that's Culiooooo

Adopt a Mariner-Julio Rodriguez

User avatar
Donn Beach
Posts: 16842
Joined: Thu May 02, 2019 1:06 am

Re: The slightly too early trade deadline thread

Post by Donn Beach » Mon Jun 05, 2023 4:14 am

Juliooooo wrote:
Sun Jun 04, 2023 8:33 pm
Here’s a question for you Donn. Do you really, honestly think the mariners did enough in the off-season out last trade deadline to improve their offense? Did it not need improving? I don’t see how it’s even a debate.
Sure they should have, but I did expect better performances from Wong and Pollock. It would be disingenuous of me to sit around ranting about how stupid they were. And what if they had added another bat? Does that really change the trajectory very much? Would that have made them division contenders? Go on and on about how they needed to add a DH, but what would that had done, given them an additional two wins at this point? And that's being generous

User avatar
D-train
Posts: 75906
Joined: Mon Apr 29, 2019 1:33 am
Location: Quincy, MA

Re: The slightly too early trade deadline thread

Post by D-train » Mon Jun 05, 2023 10:35 am

Pharmabro wrote:
Sun Jun 04, 2023 8:37 pm
Juliooooo wrote:
Sun Jun 04, 2023 7:29 pm
It was a lateral move after losing Haniger. That I was fine with, but they had a giant hole a LF and DH and said “who gives a fuck, let’s let a bunch of guys that historically hit about .200 take those spots.” Fortunately for them Kelenic figured it out, but they could have easily found a few more players that’s can hit and didn’t.
In fairness Haniger was good when healthy but he has became the Paxton of position players.
Even when healthy he has sucked since the end of 2021. The one smart thing they did in the off season was not matching the Giants offer.
dt

User avatar
D-train
Posts: 75906
Joined: Mon Apr 29, 2019 1:33 am
Location: Quincy, MA

Re: The slightly too early trade deadline thread

Post by D-train » Mon Jun 05, 2023 10:38 am

Pharmabro wrote:
Mon Jun 05, 2023 1:39 am
D-train wrote:
Sun Jun 04, 2023 2:17 pm
Deadline is almost two months away but Jerry might feel the pressure and desperation to bust a move for a bat early like he did with Santana last season.

Here are some ideas:

https://sports.mynorthwest.com/1758288/ ... they-need/
I have started making this thread a couple of times. Ohtani would make a statement of a committment to win by this organization. But as far as position players he is the only legit MVP candidate among the bunch.
The #2 bat is Chapman and he has started hot and overall has a 137 OPS+ but has a .585 OPS over the last 28 days.
#3 Lee KBO MVP OF
#4 Rhys Hoskins, Joc P., Teo, Hunter

You know signing Ohtani gives you a depth chart something like:
Ohtani
Castillo
Kirby
Ray
Gilbert
Depth
6. Miller, Marco, Woo, Hancock and if you packaged some of that depth up we could find a good hitting

2B on the trade market possible fits
(age 28)Ian Happ owed 3/60M 113 OPS+ career Cubs
age 27 Ha-Seong Kim 109 OPS+
age 26 India Reds 109 OPS+
age 29 SS Paul Dejong 125 OPS+ but really was bad for a number of years
Better chance that Trump, Biden and Mother Theresa are on this roster next season than Ohtani. Yeah I know that MT is dead.
dt

User avatar
D-train
Posts: 75906
Joined: Mon Apr 29, 2019 1:33 am
Location: Quincy, MA

Re: The slightly too early trade deadline thread

Post by D-train » Mon Jun 05, 2023 10:41 am

Donn Beach wrote:
Mon Jun 05, 2023 4:14 am
Juliooooo wrote:
Sun Jun 04, 2023 8:33 pm
Here’s a question for you Donn. Do you really, honestly think the mariners did enough in the off-season out last trade deadline to improve their offense? Did it not need improving? I don’t see how it’s even a debate.
Sure they should have, but I did expect better performances from Wong and Pollock. It would be disingenuous of me to sit around ranting about how stupid they were. And what if they had added another bat? Does that really change the trajectory very much? Would that have made them division contenders? Go on and on about how they needed to add a DH, but what would that had done, given them an additional two wins at this point? And that's being generous
You realize that is a massive indictment on the rebuild in its 5th season not an excuse for not getting another bat right?
dt

User avatar
Juliooooo
Posts: 11462
Joined: Wed May 01, 2019 4:38 am
Location: Pdx

Re: The slightly too early trade deadline thread

Post by Juliooooo » Mon Jun 05, 2023 12:53 pm

Donn Beach wrote:
Mon Jun 05, 2023 4:14 am
Juliooooo wrote:
Sun Jun 04, 2023 8:33 pm
Here’s a question for you Donn. Do you really, honestly think the mariners did enough in the off-season out last trade deadline to improve their offense? Did it not need improving? I don’t see how it’s even a debate.
Sure they should have, but I did expect better performances from Wong and Pollock. It would be disingenuous of me to sit around ranting about how stupid they were. And what if they had added another bat? Does that really change the trajectory very much? Would that have made them division contenders? Go on and on about how they needed to add a DH, but what would that had done, given them an additional two wins at this point? And that's being generous
They probably would have win 2-3 more games at this point, and would have protected the young players better. Plenty of us said before the season that mariners needed to get 2 more guys, because Kelenic was far from a sure thing, Pollock was , injuries happen, and some players are going to have down years. They left themselves no margin for error offensively
The poster formerly known as Kingfelixk. With a new forum comes a new boardname. Julio is my guy, plus we share a birthday, so that's Culiooooo

Adopt a Mariner-Julio Rodriguez

User avatar
D-train
Posts: 75906
Joined: Mon Apr 29, 2019 1:33 am
Location: Quincy, MA

Re: The slightly too early trade deadline thread

Post by D-train » Mon Jun 05, 2023 1:00 pm

Juliooooo wrote:
Mon Jun 05, 2023 12:53 pm
Donn Beach wrote:
Mon Jun 05, 2023 4:14 am
Juliooooo wrote:
Sun Jun 04, 2023 8:33 pm
Here’s a question for you Donn. Do you really, honestly think the mariners did enough in the off-season out last trade deadline to improve their offense? Did it not need improving? I don’t see how it’s even a debate.
Sure they should have, but I did expect better performances from Wong and Pollock. It would be disingenuous of me to sit around ranting about how stupid they were. And what if they had added another bat? Does that really change the trajectory very much? Would that have made them division contenders? Go on and on about how they needed to add a DH, but what would that had done, given them an additional two wins at this point? And that's being generous
They probably would have win 2-3 more games at this point, and would have protected the young players better. Plenty of us said before the season that mariners needed to get 2 more guys, because Kelenic was far from a sure thing, Pollock was , injuries happen, and some players are going to have down years. They left themselves no margin for error offensively
Right, assumed an identical year from Geno, improvement from JP and Cal, Julio not having a sophomore slump, Teo and Wong not getting T Mobiled even though it happened both Winker and Frazier right before their eyes last season. And the DH shit show to somehow produce.
dt

User avatar
AZOldDawg
Posts: 1543
Joined: Fri May 03, 2019 1:51 am
Location: Surprise, Arizona

Re: The slightly too early trade deadline thread

Post by AZOldDawg » Mon Jun 05, 2023 4:57 pm

I would be the first to bring the fences in to the start of the warning track but the "T" has nothing to do with our strike out rate. I would see if there is any way we could get Cleveland to give us Kwan. We would have a legit table setter who doesn't strike out. My bet is JD is going to trade for Ozuna and close his eyes and hope. I wonder if Murphy an some minor league talent could get us a bat from San Diego.

Post Reply