Page 4 of 10
Re: 6%?
Posted: Tue Sep 01, 2020 1:58 am
by Double Mocha Man
bpj wrote: ↑Tue Sep 01, 2020 1:48 am
...you and your masks can go eff yourself.
You should just go to Walmart without your mask and throw a hissy fit.
Re: 6%?
Posted: Tue Sep 01, 2020 2:09 am
by bpj
Double Mocha Man wrote: ↑Tue Sep 01, 2020 1:58 am
bpj wrote: ↑Tue Sep 01, 2020 1:48 am
...you and your masks can go eff yourself.
You should just go to Walmart without your mask and throw a hissy fit.
Grocery shopping is for pussies.
Re: 6%?
Posted: Tue Sep 01, 2020 2:48 am
by Moe Gibbs
Double Mocha Man wrote: ↑Tue Sep 01, 2020 12:10 am
And what about the OANN article that Moe provided?
Show me the OANN article that I provided.
Re: 6%?
Posted: Tue Sep 01, 2020 3:09 am
by Double Mocha Man
Moe Gibbs wrote: ↑Tue Sep 01, 2020 2:48 am
Double Mocha Man wrote: ↑Tue Sep 01, 2020 12:10 am
And what about the OANN article that Moe provided?
Show me the OANN article that I provided.
Sorry, my bad, it was bpj that provided it. I get you two guys mixed up.
Re: 6%?
Posted: Tue Sep 01, 2020 4:12 am
by bpj
Double Mocha Man wrote: ↑Tue Sep 01, 2020 3:09 am
Moe Gibbs wrote: ↑Tue Sep 01, 2020 2:48 am
Double Mocha Man wrote: ↑Tue Sep 01, 2020 12:10 am
And what about the OANN article that Moe provided?
Show me the OANN article that I provided.
Sorry, my bad, it was bpj that provided it. I get you two guys mixed up.
You don't know your ass from your elbows.
Every argument you made today sounds like some drunk idiot talking too much at a bar about things he thinks he knows.
If your posts had a headline:
"Liberal desperately grasping for straws doesn't realize he banned them."
Re: 6%?
Posted: Tue Sep 01, 2020 6:57 am
by DavidGee24
bpj wrote: ↑Mon Aug 31, 2020 11:37 pm
DavidGee24 wrote: ↑Mon Aug 31, 2020 10:50 pm
By the way, isn't this supposed to be in the Politics Forum? When I first saw this thread I thought it was about Joseph Odom's batting average.
Depends..
Is covid politicial??
Well, not in and of itself, but as we've noted the Democrats have made it political for the sole purpose of getting votes.
And of course it's comical, they say Trump has failed to address the pandemic blah blah blah, and with nothing of substance, mind you, just empty criticism. And it's pretty much foolproof because not only is it easy to say after the fact but the Dems don't have to prove that Hillary Clinton would have done any better. They just say it and they would say it if only 1,000 Americans were dead. And let's be honest, if it were the other way around, the GOP would be doing the same exact thing, just without the shrieking. That's how the game is played. "Change", always the buzzword.
Re: 6%?
Posted: Tue Sep 01, 2020 5:45 pm
by bpj
OANN was right, surprise.
Re: 6%?
Posted: Tue Sep 01, 2020 7:51 pm
by D-train
So I was on twitter and some clown responded to a tweet by softy that the Pac 12 was trying to keep its athlete's alive. I said well I went to a Curtis Williams charity event for him and he died shortly thereafter because of an injury sustained while playing football so maybe they should ban it forever.
First imbecile says he died of natural causes not from football. He died at age 24 due to being a quadriplegic.......FROM playing football.
Second clown says no way I could become paralyzed by going to a charity event. How in the absolute F do they people make it through the day with an IQ of 47.
Re: 6%?
Posted: Tue Sep 01, 2020 9:25 pm
by DavidGee24
By using all 47 of those points, especially at crosswalks and when handling scissors.
Re: 6%?
Posted: Tue Sep 01, 2020 9:32 pm
by Sexymarinersfan
DavidGee24 wrote: ↑Tue Sep 01, 2020 9:25 pm
By using all 47 of those points, especially at crosswalks and when handling scissors.