You mean like the lookout landing article? It was interesting when it came out but really there wasn't much to it, an unnamed source claims the mariners will spend lots of money someday in the future. I don't see it as them lying. but it's been disappointing.D-train wrote: ↑Mon Oct 07, 2024 7:28 pmNot only that they lied about using the savings to go all in once they were ready. Complete fucking lie. Seems kind of greedy too.Donn Beach wrote: ↑Mon Oct 07, 2024 7:16 pmParticularly the Mets, all the talk about them going into rebuild mode, The Mets aren't going to rebuild anymore than the Yankees rebuild. They are going to reload.
It's interesting to me to me to dig into the concept of rebuilding. Fans have been conditioned to accept seasons of slashed payrolls and losing for a blessing of wins in the future someday. I think a lot of it is pretty much a scam MLB has been able to sell fans to keep their payrolls down. The mariners used it effectively
Their franchise as a business, and I think they run it conservatively and without imagination, but I don't see it as greed. I don't think owners are taking profits to augment their personal lifestyles. I do think there's a reluctance to invest aggressively in players as a business strategy. It could be interesting to sit down with Stanton and challenge their approach as opposed to the padres. Again, I don't see it as greed. The padres approach was about making money. It was seen as a good way to grow the business. I don't think it was greed vs non greed