Game Threads 159, 160, 161 and 162 vs Angels

Gametime
Posts: 4587
Joined: Sun Sep 08, 2019 9:19 pm

Re: Game Threads 159, 160, 161 and 162 vs Angels

Post by Gametime » Sat Sep 26, 2026 5:19 am

Please never rely on Brash again. If he’s here it’s a luxury. But, he’s an injury waiting to happen.

Sports Hernia
Posts: 288
Joined: Wed Apr 03, 2024 9:13 pm

Re: Game Threads 159, 160, 161 and 162 vs Angels

Post by Sports Hernia » Sat Sep 26, 2026 6:34 am

After this season I’m actually excited for a lockout.
Founding member of the John Stanton hate club.

DavidGee24
Posts: 11502
Joined: Wed May 01, 2019 6:24 pm
Location: Phillips Ranch, CA

Re: Game Threads 159, 160, 161 and 162 vs Angels

Post by DavidGee24 » Sat Sep 26, 2026 7:01 am

Mariners celebrating Rick Rizz Weekend with a big FU into retirement. How awesome would it be if in the ninth inning of Sunday's finale he totally snaps. PLEASE MAKE THIS HAPPEN

Donn Beach
Posts: 21052
Joined: Thu May 02, 2019 1:06 am

Re: Game Threads 159, 160, 161 and 162 vs Angels

Post by Donn Beach » Sat Sep 26, 2026 2:31 pm

And the division is going to be won by a team with a sub 500 record, what a season

DavidGee24
Posts: 11502
Joined: Wed May 01, 2019 6:24 pm
Location: Phillips Ranch, CA

Re: Game Threads 159, 160, 161 and 162 vs Angels

Post by DavidGee24 » Sat Sep 26, 2026 3:35 pm

Donn Beach wrote: ↑
Sat Sep 26, 2026 2:31 pm
And the division is going to be won by a team with a sub 500 record, what a season
Yep, first time ever if it happens. With 5-team divisions it was bound to happen.

In the NFL you have 4-team divisions so now and then you'll have a 7-9 division champion.

The NBA has 5-team divisions but as far as I know only the Bullets ever won a division title with a losing record, in 1972 at 38-44 when there only 4 teams.

The NHL has 8-team divisions so it's almost impossible for everyone to have a losing record although the Golden Knights technically went 39-43 last season but with all their OT loss "loser points" finished ahead of the Ducks who technically went 43-39. Also, when the NHL expanded in 1967 they put all the expansion teams not only in the same division but in their own conference. All of them had losing records. And yes, one of them got to play in the Finals.

DavidGee24
Posts: 11502
Joined: Wed May 01, 2019 6:24 pm
Location: Phillips Ranch, CA

Re: Game Threads 159, 160, 161 and 162 vs Angels

Post by DavidGee24 » Sat Sep 26, 2026 4:04 pm

rockycola wrote: ↑
Sat Sep 26, 2026 2:56 am
So far, 9 up, 9 down.
Can we stop rolling over and playing dead!?!?! Please get a fucking hit.
Just remembered I promised to make another Moose meme...
b22vqs.jpg
b22vqs.jpg (89.81 KiB) Viewed 59 times

Donn Beach
Posts: 21052
Joined: Thu May 02, 2019 1:06 am

Re: Game Threads 159, 160, 161 and 162 vs Angels

Post by Donn Beach » Sat Sep 26, 2026 5:28 pm

DavidGee24 wrote: ↑
Sat Sep 26, 2026 3:35 pm
Donn Beach wrote: ↑
Sat Sep 26, 2026 2:31 pm
And the division is going to be won by a team with a sub 500 record, what a season
Yep, first time ever if it happens. With 5-team divisions it was bound to happen.

In the NFL you have 4-team divisions so now and then you'll have a 7-9 division champion.

The NBA has 5-team divisions but as far as I know only the Bullets ever won a division title with a losing record, in 1972 at 38-44 when there only 4 teams.

The NHL has 8-team divisions so it's almost impossible for everyone to have a losing record although the Golden Knights technically went 39-43 last season but with all their OT loss "loser points" finished ahead of the Ducks who technically went 43-39. Also, when the NHL expanded in 1967 they put all the expansion teams not only in the same division but in their own conference. All of them had losing records. And yes, one of them got to play in the Finals.
I don't know...the complaints, 54%, dipoto didn't do enough, signing Naylor, all that. That really isn't what this was about, the timing was correct, 54% would have comfortably won it. They waited their turn back when the Astros had a clamp on the division, and here it was. It be one thing if there was the normal competition for the division, but for them not to be able to even come up with a .500 record when it would have won the division. That combination, who had this on their bingo card? This is their first losing record in five seasons? All they had to do is play .500 baseball, that's it. That would have been criminally underperforming in terms of expectations, just wow

User avatar
D-train
Posts: 83139
Joined: Mon Apr 29, 2019 1:33 am
Location: Quincy, MA

Re: Game Threads 159, 160, 161 and 162 vs Angels

Post by D-train » Sat Sep 26, 2026 5:39 pm

I am totally convinced that the 54% and sustainability culture is what led to this. Just try to do just enough and this is the result.

No killer instinct. It more Loiterer instinct. It is NOT what sports is all about and here we are.
dt

Donn Beach
Posts: 21052
Joined: Thu May 02, 2019 1:06 am

Re: Game Threads 159, 160, 161 and 162 vs Angels

Post by Donn Beach » Sat Sep 26, 2026 5:46 pm

I am not any good at recollection, the flow of the season. It just all seems crappy to me. But I was reading a retrospective article. It pointed out there was a high point, In July? They had a winning streak, they were three games over. 500. Their odds for winning the division were actually high. Then they went in the tank. For as crappy as the first have was the second half was even crappier. That just seems weird to me. It wasn't like they were crippled with injuries or whatever. How did they manage to follow that first half with an even worse second half?

Donn Beach
Posts: 21052
Joined: Thu May 02, 2019 1:06 am

Re: Game Threads 159, 160, 161 and 162 vs Angels

Post by Donn Beach » Sat Sep 26, 2026 5:50 pm

D-train wrote: ↑
Sat Sep 26, 2026 5:39 pm
I am totally convinced that the 54% and sustainability culture is what led to this. Just try to do just enough and this is the result.

No killer instinct. It more Loiterer instinct. It is NOT what sports is all about and here we are.
That's fine, I don't see it. They didn't need a killer instinct. All they had to do was be their typical mediocre selves. I don't think there's an explanation to begin with. It's like so much that goes on with that team, the curse lives on. If they had managed to win the division with a .500 record and gotten bounced out of the playoffs then we could have had the normal round of complaints about sustainability, not doing enough, bla bla bla. This to me is beyond belief, how much further this goes

Post Reply