bpj: 86
ISLTM: "There's no way you could have predicted they would actually use their whole roster."
Yeah dude... all you've got is a silly prediction that you think means something it doesn't.
Marm was light-years ahead of White.IStillLoveTheMs wrote: ↑Sun Jul 11, 2021 8:04 amYeah dude... all you've got is a silly prediction that you think means something it doesn't.
Even funnier, the team that wins 86 games will likely look far different than the one we've got today. It's a number that literally says nothing about how they got there.
I'll ask again, why don't you tell us about how much you wanted Marm to be inserted into the every day lineup?
You do realize that the vast, vast, vast majority of teams who do this are fucking horrible and fail far more often than not right? Many former M's teams went dumpster diving, threw shit at the wall and failed.bpj wrote: ↑Sun Jul 11, 2021 8:08 amMarm was light-years ahead of White.IStillLoveTheMs wrote: ↑Sun Jul 11, 2021 8:04 amYeah dude... all you've got is a silly prediction that you think means something it doesn't.
Even funnier, the team that wins 86 games will likely look far different than the one we've got today. It's a number that literally says nothing about how they got there.
I'll ask again, why don't you tell us about how much you wanted Marm to be inserted into the every day lineup?
I said so many times, all they had to do was eliminate black holes. Looks like they've eliminated most of them to me.
Did you add up all of the wins from guys that weren't on the 40 man yet? All they had to do was eliminate black holes. You can search for that phrase for yourself.
You're just embarrassing yourself with this, "But you'd didn't know who the relievers would be!" nonsense.
I don't care who it is, but if they're not performing, on to the next. Convenient how injuries to terrible players come out of nowhere the day after they pitch.
I predicted 70 wins based off the 25 man roster. A 25-man that has proven to be utterly dreadful.bpj wrote: ↑Sun Jul 11, 2021 8:16 amYeah, Marm was my first choice!
You're the second biggest loser I've ever encountered behind weebs. Such a tool. And always wrong, it's almost funny how tight you'll cling to anything, even when it's as simple as, dude, you predicted 70 wins with pretty much the same 40 man roster. You suck.
I'm sure if they were on pace for 70 wins it would be all going according to how you saw it. Such a dunce.
Maybe that's why you're missing about 15-20 winsIStillLoveTheMs wrote: ↑Sun Jul 11, 2021 8:20 amI predicted 70 wins based off the 25 man roster. A 25-man that has proven to be utterly dreadful.bpj wrote: ↑Sun Jul 11, 2021 8:16 amYeah, Marm was my first choice!
You're the second biggest loser I've ever encountered behind weebs. Such a tool. And always wrong, it's almost funny how tight you'll cling to anything, even when it's as simple as, dude, you predicted 70 wins with pretty much the same 40 man roster. You suck.
I'm sure if they were on pace for 70 wins it would be all going according to how you saw it. Such a dunce.
If you based 86 wins off a 40 man that featured 3x relievers who were pig shit for every other team they've pitched for you're even dumber than I thought.
Yeah and you really think Nelson Cruz was interested in joining the 2021 M's and that glorious 40 man roster they assembled?bpj wrote: ↑Sun Jul 11, 2021 8:20 amI said what the team needed to do going in to the season was get rid of the riffraff that was going to drag them down and cost them a roster spot. They needed to add Cruz + a SP to be a solid contender. The bullpen would sort itself out with spaghetti.
I complained nonstop about bums like Newsome.
That's exactly where we sit.