The slightly too early trade deadline thread

User avatar
Donn Beach
Posts: 16844
Joined: Thu May 02, 2019 1:06 am

Re: The slightly too early trade deadline thread

Post by Donn Beach » Tue Aug 01, 2023 3:18 pm

I wandered into strikeout records, the MLB record for strikeouts by a pitcher is 513 if you include pre 20th century. If you want to bother it's an interesting story


https://thebaseballbloggess.com/2021/06 ... whirlwind/

User avatar
D-train
Posts: 75906
Joined: Mon Apr 29, 2019 1:33 am
Location: Quincy, MA

Re: The slightly too early trade deadline thread

Post by D-train » Tue Aug 01, 2023 3:23 pm

Donn Beach wrote:
Tue Aug 01, 2023 2:34 pm
And what team is that? What team is going to trade value for Woo and then proceed to run his arm into the ground?
Run his arm into the ground. lol You must think Jerry has a PhD in physiology???
dt

User avatar
Sexymarinersfan
Posts: 8881
Joined: Sat May 04, 2019 11:34 pm
Location: Ft. Worth Texas
Contact:

Re: The slightly too early trade deadline thread

Post by Sexymarinersfan » Tue Aug 01, 2023 3:28 pm

Kolten is a gosh darn escape artist.

Captain 97
Posts: 3233
Joined: Mon May 06, 2019 9:23 pm

Re: The slightly too early trade deadline thread

Post by Captain 97 » Tue Aug 01, 2023 3:33 pm

Seattle or Bust wrote:
Tue Aug 01, 2023 2:24 pm
D-train wrote:
Tue Aug 01, 2023 2:18 pm
Seattle or Bust wrote:
Tue Aug 01, 2023 2:17 pm
Padres had the bases loaded nobody out in the top of the 10th inning last night with Bogaerts up and didn't score a run. Rockies walked them off with a bases loaded sac fly themselves. They just cannot get over the hump.

How I wouldn't mind a package for Soto centered around Woo and France and few prospects.
They can have Trammell back too.....
I honestly want to see them trade Woo so we can get Hancock up here.

I don't think there'd be fall off and Hancock would head into '24 seemingly without an innings limit as he's gonna hit 150 or so innings this season.
I think the luster is off of Hancock. He has a 4.26 ERA in AA as a 24 year old. He is far from ready and may never get there. He seems fragile. might be a candidate for the bullpen at some point.

User avatar
Donn Beach
Posts: 16844
Joined: Thu May 02, 2019 1:06 am

Re: The slightly too early trade deadline thread

Post by Donn Beach » Tue Aug 01, 2023 3:34 pm

D-train wrote:
Tue Aug 01, 2023 3:23 pm
Donn Beach wrote:
Tue Aug 01, 2023 2:34 pm
And what team is that? What team is going to trade value for Woo and then proceed to run his arm into the ground?
Run his arm into the ground. lol You must think Jerry has a PhD in physiology???
What I think is every ML team these days handles their pitching the same way. They invest in it and protect it. Is there a team you know of that handles it differently?

User avatar
Juliooooo
Posts: 11462
Joined: Wed May 01, 2019 4:38 am
Location: Pdx

Re: The slightly too early trade deadline thread

Post by Juliooooo » Tue Aug 01, 2023 3:56 pm

Captain 97 wrote:
Tue Aug 01, 2023 3:33 pm
Seattle or Bust wrote:
Tue Aug 01, 2023 2:24 pm
D-train wrote:
Tue Aug 01, 2023 2:18 pm


They can have Trammell back too.....
I honestly want to see them trade Woo so we can get Hancock up here.

I don't think there'd be fall off and Hancock would head into '24 seemingly without an innings limit as he's gonna hit 150 or so innings this season.
I think the luster is off of Hancock. He has a 4.26 ERA in AA as a 24 year old. He is far from ready and may never get there. He seems fragile. might be a candidate for the bullpen at some point.
Emerson has been awesome the last 2 months other than 1 start. He gave up 9 in one game, and still has a 2.73 ERA since June 6
The poster formerly known as Kingfelixk. With a new forum comes a new boardname. Julio is my guy, plus we share a birthday, so that's Culiooooo

Adopt a Mariner-Julio Rodriguez

User avatar
D-train
Posts: 75906
Joined: Mon Apr 29, 2019 1:33 am
Location: Quincy, MA

Re: The slightly too early trade deadline thread

Post by D-train » Tue Aug 01, 2023 4:03 pm

Donn Beach wrote:
Tue Aug 01, 2023 3:34 pm
D-train wrote:
Tue Aug 01, 2023 3:23 pm
Donn Beach wrote:
Tue Aug 01, 2023 2:34 pm
And what team is that? What team is going to trade value for Woo and then proceed to run his arm into the ground?
Run his arm into the ground. lol You must think Jerry has a PhD in physiology???
What I think is every ML team these days handles their pitching the same way. They invest in it and protect it. Is there a team you know of that handles it differently?
Other teams are idiots about it too. Classic example right here. In 2022 the Phillies limited Andrew Painter to 103 innings in 22 starts less than 5 innings per. Here is the result of them NOT running his arm into the ground.

https://www.cbssports.com/mlb/news/andr ... n-surgery/
dt

Seattle or Bust
Posts: 9006
Joined: Wed Mar 09, 2022 7:09 pm

Re: The slightly too early trade deadline thread

Post by Seattle or Bust » Tue Aug 01, 2023 4:09 pm

Captain 97 wrote:
Tue Aug 01, 2023 3:33 pm
Seattle or Bust wrote:
Tue Aug 01, 2023 2:24 pm
D-train wrote:
Tue Aug 01, 2023 2:18 pm


They can have Trammell back too.....
I honestly want to see them trade Woo so we can get Hancock up here.

I don't think there'd be fall off and Hancock would head into '24 seemingly without an innings limit as he's gonna hit 150 or so innings this season.
I think the luster is off of Hancock. He has a 4.26 ERA in AA as a 24 year old. He is far from ready and may never get there. He seems fragile. might be a candidate for the bullpen at some point.
Look deeper into his starts.

12 of his 19 starts he has allowed 1 run or less. In those starts he has a .90 ERA :!:

In 14 of his 19 starts, he has allowed 3 runs or less. In those starts he has a 1.14 ERA.

That plays every day of the week.

The problem is that he has had 5 starts where he hasn't been able to make it past the 4th inning... in 3 of those starts he hasn't been able to make it through 2 innings and was shelled.

The question you have to ask is which starts represent the player more? The 14 where he was near untouchable? Or the weird starts where he couldn't make it past the 2nd inning?

Captain 97
Posts: 3233
Joined: Mon May 06, 2019 9:23 pm

Re: The slightly too early trade deadline thread

Post by Captain 97 » Tue Aug 01, 2023 4:11 pm

Seattle or Bust wrote:
Tue Aug 01, 2023 4:09 pm
Captain 97 wrote:
Tue Aug 01, 2023 3:33 pm
Seattle or Bust wrote:
Tue Aug 01, 2023 2:24 pm


I honestly want to see them trade Woo so we can get Hancock up here.

I don't think there'd be fall off and Hancock would head into '24 seemingly without an innings limit as he's gonna hit 150 or so innings this season.
I think the luster is off of Hancock. He has a 4.26 ERA in AA as a 24 year old. He is far from ready and may never get there. He seems fragile. might be a candidate for the bullpen at some point.
Look deeper into his starts.

12 of his 19 starts he has allowed 1 run or less. In those starts he has a .90 ERA :!:

In 14 of his 19 starts, he has allowed 3 runs or less. In those starts he has a 1.14 ERA.

That plays every day of the week.

The problem is that he has had 5 starts where he hasn't been able to make it past the 4th inning... in 3 of those starts he hasn't been able to make it through 2 innings and was shelled.

The question you have to ask is which starts represent the player more? The 14 where he was near untouchable? Or the weird starts where he clearly can't make it past the 2nd inning?
Every pitcher looks great if you ignore their bad starts. :lol:

Seattle or Bust
Posts: 9006
Joined: Wed Mar 09, 2022 7:09 pm

Re: The slightly too early trade deadline thread

Post by Seattle or Bust » Tue Aug 01, 2023 4:28 pm

Captain 97 wrote:
Tue Aug 01, 2023 4:11 pm
Seattle or Bust wrote:
Tue Aug 01, 2023 4:09 pm
Captain 97 wrote:
Tue Aug 01, 2023 3:33 pm


I think the luster is off of Hancock. He has a 4.26 ERA in AA as a 24 year old. He is far from ready and may never get there. He seems fragile. might be a candidate for the bullpen at some point.
Look deeper into his starts.

12 of his 19 starts he has allowed 1 run or less. In those starts he has a .90 ERA :!:

In 14 of his 19 starts, he has allowed 3 runs or less. In those starts he has a 1.14 ERA.

That plays every day of the week.

The problem is that he has had 5 starts where he hasn't been able to make it past the 4th inning... in 3 of those starts he hasn't been able to make it through 2 innings and was shelled.

The question you have to ask is which starts represent the player more? The 14 where he was near untouchable? Or the weird starts where he clearly can't make it past the 2nd inning?
Every pitcher looks great if you ignore their bad starts. :lol:
You have come to the forum today to make really blanket statements today it seems...

Not every pitcher has 14 starts with a 1.14 ERA.

Post Reply