D-train wrote: ↑Wed Mar 23, 2022 12:20 pm
Donn Beach wrote: ↑Wed Mar 23, 2022 12:11 pm
Sure, in signing Kris Bryant, the Rockies are getting a player with a career fWAR of 31.8 and a career wRC+ of 134 — offense that the Rockies desperately need, especially given Trevor Story’s decision to sign with the Red Sox. But there’s more to it than that. When a team signs a player to a seven-year, $182 million contract, they’re looking for more than his on-field skills.
In addition to becoming the face of the Rockies, Bryant is a message to fans: It’s a new day, and the Rockies are trying to win
That there, when are the mariners going to do that? I think it might begin with convincing a quality offensive FA of it. Yeah, they might even have to over spend. Like the rangers going into the off season talking about a desire to spend and realizing they weren't in a position to ask for discounts. Looked at what they accomplished. Dipoto should be embarrassed
You think JD could have offered Semien and Seager a half Billions????
![Shocked :shock:](./images/smilies/icon_eek.gif)
Its ownership. As you said a few months ago, why wouldn't JD spend every penny he had available to him???
We are talking "things being equal" intangibles. Assuming there is something more to it than just dollars, and I believe there is at times. When it comes to hammering out an agreement a team with a track record of displaying a desire to win could trump the mariners.
If Bryant was given the opportunity to be the face of the Rockies or the face of the mariners, he very well could have still picked the Rockies. The mariners failed attempt at doing it with cano could actually be an issue.
I don't think players worry much about poop in the streets or travel miles as much as playing for an organization that has a track record of really trying to win. I think that's the area the mariners could come up short .
Sure intangibles can be trumped with money but so far the mariners haven't shown the willingness to do that, unlike the rangers.