The slightly too early trade deadline thread
Re: The slightly too early trade deadline thread
No mention of Passan's fav team who he thinks had a great off season?
dt
- seattlefan-daBronx
- Posts: 14547
- Joined: Wed May 01, 2019 9:37 pm
Re: The slightly too early trade deadline thread
I guarantee they won't extend the qualifying offer.D-train wrote: ↑Tue Jun 06, 2023 10:42 amGeno is cooked and Teo leads the league in Ks. Maybe a teams 57th best prospect for Geno if we pay 97% of his salary. A couple months of Teo for a team in a hitters park might net us a top 30 prospect but I would just keep him an offer him a QO which he will refuse and we get a draft pick which would be a top 10-15 prospect in our system.
- Donn Beach
- Posts: 16844
- Joined: Thu May 02, 2019 1:06 am
Re: The slightly too early trade deadline thread
Sell what?desbcoach wrote: ↑Mon Jun 05, 2023 8:07 pmI agree sell, Bring up Jake Scheiner see if he can play or if we need a third baseman as wellD-train wrote: ↑Mon Jun 05, 2023 7:36 pmSell!
https://sports.mynorthwest.com/1758418/ ... -deadline/
Re: The slightly too early trade deadline thread
True, they don't have much that's not nailed down.Donn Beach wrote: ↑Wed Jun 07, 2023 8:46 amSell what?desbcoach wrote: ↑Mon Jun 05, 2023 8:07 pmI agree sell, Bring up Jake Scheiner see if he can play or if we need a third baseman as wellD-train wrote: ↑Mon Jun 05, 2023 7:36 pmSell!
https://sports.mynorthwest.com/1758418/ ... -deadline/
They could probably find a taker for Teoscar based on his history.
They could find a match for Marco if they cover some salary- which they should.
We'd probably be better off without the final couple years of Eugenio's contract, so if they can find a match for him it may be the biggest return.
Re: The slightly too early trade deadline thread
They should. He will reject it.GL_Storm wrote: ↑Wed Jun 07, 2023 2:10 amI guarantee they won't extend the qualifying offer.D-train wrote: ↑Tue Jun 06, 2023 10:42 amGeno is cooked and Teo leads the league in Ks. Maybe a teams 57th best prospect for Geno if we pay 97% of his salary. A couple months of Teo for a team in a hitters park might net us a top 30 prospect but I would just keep him an offer him a QO which he will refuse and we get a draft pick which would be a top 10-15 prospect in our system.
dt
Re: The slightly too early trade deadline thread
Geno turns 32 yo next month and since early April is hitting .177/.593 AND is owed $25M. The very definition of untradeable unless it is a Silva for Milton Bradley shit contract for shit contract type deal.
dt
Re: The slightly too early trade deadline thread
Can you imagine if we had gone after Arráez last offseason? Based on the deal the Marlins swung, we could easily have matched it and still have a rock solid starting rotation, and depth to spare.
Imagine where we’d be with a 2B who is nearly hitting .400???
https://www.mlb.com/news/luis-arraez-chasing-400
Imagine where we’d be with a 2B who is nearly hitting .400???
https://www.mlb.com/news/luis-arraez-chasing-400
Re: The slightly too early trade deadline thread
You had the trade idea of the off season BM. No doubt about it. Kudos! Wish you were our GM instead of the current Dumb Fs in charge.Big_Maple wrote: ↑Wed Jun 07, 2023 2:31 pmCan you imagine if we had gone after Arráez last offseason? Based on the deal the Marlins swung, we could easily have matched it and still have a rock solid starting rotation, and depth to spare.
Imagine where we’d be with a 2B who is nearly hitting .400???
https://www.mlb.com/news/luis-arraez-chasing-400
dt
Re: The slightly too early trade deadline thread
Haha! Well, it wasn’t rocket science. The dude won the AL batting championship, and he could play 2B - both of these were needs during the off-season. He would not have been cheap - likely would have taken a Kirby or a Gilbert to get it done. But a 26 year old 2B who can get on base dependably - why would we not have made a run? Instead we replaced Frazier with Kolten. *Sigh*