Mariner Talk Chat Forum

Posted: **Sun May 19, 2019 11:22 pm**

And we are currently sitting at the 10th overall pick for the 2020 MLB Draft.

I'm sticking with my prediction of 80-82.

Posted: **Mon May 20, 2019 12:05 am**

Assuming Encarnacion gets dealt (along with some others) I would think that they will have at best a .400 winning % going forward this season.

Posted: **Mon May 20, 2019 12:42 am**

If that was the case, that would currently put us at pick number 4.

Posted: **Mon May 20, 2019 12:48 am**

Looking at the standings here, it seems to me that the M's will be battling the following franchises for a top 5 pick:
Miami (13-31)
Kansas City (16-31)
Baltimore (15-31)
Detroit (18-26)
Chicago WS (21-24)
San Fran (20-25)
Toronto (19-27)
Cincinnati (21-26)

Ms will be selling off pretty soon here. Bruce, EE, perhaps Beckham and Leake will be sent packing. The bullpen and rotation are in shambles. I really think it's Mariners, Miami, KC, Baltimore doing battle for the top 3.

Posted: **Mon May 20, 2019 1:18 am**

I thought I would see a link to someone's instagram and a beautiful Ferrari 458

https://www.google.com/search?q=ferrari ... BYfbY11jNM:

Posted: **Mon May 20, 2019 2:08 am**

Vogelbomb wrote: ↑
Mon May 20, 2019 12:48 am
Looking at the standings here, it seems to me that the M's will be battling the following franchises for a top 5 pick:
Miami (13-31)
Kansas City (16-31)
Baltimore (15-31)
Detroit (18-26)
Chicago WS (21-24)
San Fran (20-25)
Toronto (19-27)
Cincinnati (21-26)

Ms will be selling off pretty soon here. Bruce, EE, perhaps Beckham and Leake will be sent packing. The bullpen and rotation are in shambles. I really think it's Mariners, Miami, KC, Baltimore doing battle for the top 3.

Top 3 gets you a shot at a foundational piece to add with Jared Kelenic, Julio Rodriguez, Logan Gilbert, Justin Dunn, and Justus Sheffield, Shed Long, Evan White, and Ljay Newsome.

Posted: **Mon May 20, 2019 2:23 am**

Sexymarinersfan wrote: ↑
Mon May 20, 2019 2:08 am

Vogelbomb wrote: ↑
Mon May 20, 2019 12:48 am
Looking at the standings here, it seems to me that the M's will be battling the following franchises for a top 5 pick:
Miami (13-31)
Kansas City (16-31)
Baltimore (15-31)
Detroit (18-26)
Chicago WS (21-24)
San Fran (20-25)
Toronto (19-27)
Cincinnati (21-26)

Ms will be selling off pretty soon here. Bruce, EE, perhaps Beckham and Leake will be sent packing. The bullpen and rotation are in shambles. I really think it's Mariners, Miami, KC, Baltimore doing battle for the top 3.
Top 3 gets you a shot at a foundational piece to add with Jared Kelenic, Julio Rodriguez, Logan Gilbert, Justin Dunn, and Justus Sheffield, Shed Long, Evan White, and Ljay Newsome.

If Shed long is a foundational piece we are f-d.

Posted: **Mon May 20, 2019 2:25 am**

If Shed long is part of the foundation we are building a shed on the street of dreams..........

Posted: **Mon May 20, 2019 2:53 am**

Sexymarinersfan wrote: ↑
Sun May 19, 2019 11:22 pm
And we are currently sitting at the 10th overall pick for the 2020 MLB Draft.

I'm sticking with my prediction of 80-82.

Everybody is safe with their season predictions. In fact, I just went over to the Times to grab the pertinent post from that thread and bring it over here.

It's gone...............even somebody,s son,s ever-changing predictions.

No winners. No losers. Well, except us losers following this sorry, sad sack, shitshow of this 2019 Pee Wee Mariner team.

I think Darren was over there just now looking for it, too.

WHO IS ONLINE
Users browsing this forum: D-Trains and 12 guests

Posted: **Mon May 20, 2019 8:53 am**

I have said this before but you go back to the 2000 draft from 2015 and you have 16 out of 48 top 3 picks that went on to be an All Star, 8 of those did not go to more than one or two all star games and at most 5(subjectively) went on to be a foundation piece on which to build a team.

The odds of getting a perennial all star never mind a foundation piece are very low with a top 3 pick in the MLB.

Mariner Talk Chat Forum

.390*

.390*

Re: .458

Re: .458

Re: .458

Re: .458

Re: .458

Re: .458

Re: .458

Re: .458

Re: .458