Penny on the trading block

User avatar
D-train
Posts: 70509
Joined: Mon Apr 29, 2019 1:33 am
Location: Quincy, MA

Re: Penny on the trading block

Post by D-train » Sun Oct 27, 2019 8:50 pm

If we can trade for a player that is more needed than back up RB we should do it. Pretty simple.
dt

User avatar
Sibelius Hindemith
Posts: 11862
Joined: Thu May 02, 2019 3:09 am
Location: Seattle

Re: Penny on the trading block

Post by Sibelius Hindemith » Sun Oct 27, 2019 10:44 pm

I would feel better about it if they had used Homer at all this season to see what he's got, and Prosise perhaps a bit more. Without Penny, the back-up situation is tenuous at best.

Gametime
Posts: 3634
Joined: Sun Sep 08, 2019 9:19 pm

Re: Penny on the trading block

Post by Gametime » Sun Oct 27, 2019 11:00 pm

Penny is nothing special at all. Still too early to give up on. But, a big disappoint as a first rounder.

trharder
Posts: 1398
Joined: Wed May 01, 2019 3:47 am

Re: Penny on the trading block

Post by trharder » Mon Oct 28, 2019 1:47 am

D-train wrote:
Sun Oct 27, 2019 8:50 pm
If we can trade for a player that is more needed than back up RB we should do it. Pretty simple.
When you have a four horse stable of running backs is the #2 guy technically a "back up"?

User avatar
D-train
Posts: 70509
Joined: Mon Apr 29, 2019 1:33 am
Location: Quincy, MA

Re: Penny on the trading block

Post by D-train » Mon Oct 28, 2019 1:50 am

trharder wrote:
Mon Oct 28, 2019 1:47 am
D-train wrote:
Sun Oct 27, 2019 8:50 pm
If we can trade for a player that is more needed than back up RB we should do it. Pretty simple.
When you have a four horse stable of running backs is the #2 guy technically a "back up"?
Semantics are irrelevant, if the trade gives us a better chance to win more games we should do it.
dt

trharder
Posts: 1398
Joined: Wed May 01, 2019 3:47 am

Re: Penny on the trading block

Post by trharder » Mon Oct 28, 2019 1:55 am

D-train wrote:
Mon Oct 28, 2019 1:50 am
trharder wrote:
Mon Oct 28, 2019 1:47 am
D-train wrote:
Sun Oct 27, 2019 8:50 pm
If we can trade for a player that is more needed than back up RB we should do it. Pretty simple.
When you have a four horse stable of running backs is the #2 guy technically a "back up"?
Semantics are irrelevant, if the trade gives us a better chance to win more games we should do it.
So, you're saying you didn't use the term "back up" to diminish Penny's role? What you are now saying is true
for any player on the team.

User avatar
D-train
Posts: 70509
Joined: Mon Apr 29, 2019 1:33 am
Location: Quincy, MA

Re: Penny on the trading block

Post by D-train » Mon Oct 28, 2019 2:49 am

trharder wrote:
Mon Oct 28, 2019 1:55 am
D-train wrote:
Mon Oct 28, 2019 1:50 am
trharder wrote:
Mon Oct 28, 2019 1:47 am

When you have a four horse stable of running backs is the #2 guy technically a "back up"?
Semantics are irrelevant, if the trade gives us a better chance to win more games we should do it.
So, you're saying you didn't use the term "back up" to diminish Penny's role? What you are now saying is true
for any player on the team.
No I used it because he had 22 carries and Carson had 139 before today. True but he is the only one that is involved in trade rumors at the moment.
dt

Post Reply