It makes more sense if you just look at the QBs that have won. It's not just the cap, it's the fact that once you have the QB, he needs to elevate the rest of the team, because you can no longer over spend to surround him. I think if you look at playoff teams as opposed to just the ultimate winner? There are more teams involved in the NFL than in baseball.D-train wrote: ↑Fri Feb 07, 2025 6:38 pmIf the intent of the the salary cap is parity as opposed to just saving the owners money it is a complete fail. And the lack of a cap does nothing to prevent parity in MLB. Take a look at how many SB winners there have been this century and how many WS winners there have been.
Plus? Baseball is a series. Strange shit can happen in a series.