Their biggest move was a bold trade of third- and seventh-round picks, a future second-round pick and a swap of fourth-round picks for Tunsil. The irony of the trade was that Houston badly needs offensive line help, and the Commanders didn't have to upgrade -- Brandon Coleman posted above average pass block and run block win rates as a rookie last season. But Tunsil is a high-end pass blocker despite leading all players in penalties last season.
Grubb didn't put anything in motion
- Donn Beach
- Posts: 16940
- Joined: Thu May 02, 2019 1:06 am
Re: Grubb didn't put anything in motion
check out the Commanders, i am constantly intrigued with the moves they make since they were sold. Here they are like the total opposite of the Seahawks. They already took their Oline from one of the worst to one of the best. So what's their big off season move this time? Well lets invest more in the Oline, wild
-
- Posts: 12772
- Joined: Wed May 01, 2019 5:27 am
Re: Grubb didn't put anything in motion
Philly? Good O Line. Detroit? Good O Line. Washington? Good O Line. Remind me again who played in the NFC Divisional Round? That's right, those three and the Rams.Donn Beach wrote: ↑Tue Jul 15, 2025 12:17 amcheck out the Commanders, i am constantly intrigued with the moves they make since they were sold. Here they are like the total opposite of the Seahawks. They already took their Oline from one of the worst to one of the best. So what's their big off season move this time? Well lets invest more in the Oline, wild
Their biggest move was a bold trade of third- and seventh-round picks, a future second-round pick and a swap of fourth-round picks for Tunsil. The irony of the trade was that Houston badly needs offensive line help, and the Commanders didn't have to upgrade -- Brandon Coleman posted above average pass block and run block win rates as a rookie last season. But Tunsil is a high-end pass blocker despite leading all players in penalties last season.
Continually focusing on the O Line isn't that intriguing, in my opinion. It's what good teams do. Seattle goes cheap and then makes excuses. Schneider is a douche bag who's act has worn out if you ask me. There are five starters on the O Line. Name another unit that starts five? If you have a Nickel back you could say the secondary. But otherwise? Investing in the O Line is just smart football. Something that is apparently lost here....yet no one cares.
- Donn Beach
- Posts: 16940
- Joined: Thu May 02, 2019 1:06 am
Re: Grubb didn't put anything in motion
that's what i am saying, its the one unit i seem to be interested in enough to really follow what other teams are doing, more than defensive lines really. So anyway I am looking some more. I guess I overvalued the commander Oline, more like the most improved Oline as opposed to one of the best. But still, Peters used his first round pick on an Oline man as well as trading for Tunsil. They are probably going to have four new starters this season. Could you imagine the Seahawks line being the most improved Oline in the NFL and JS going ahead and replacing it? Peters has got to be the polar opposite of JS in that respect. And I bet generally Peters is considered the sharpest tool in the shed these daysMichael K. wrote: ↑Tue Jul 15, 2025 3:19 pmPhilly? Good O Line. Detroit? Good O Line. Washington? Good O Line. Remind me again who played in the NFC Divisional Round? That's right, those three and the Rams.Donn Beach wrote: ↑Tue Jul 15, 2025 12:17 amcheck out the Commanders, i am constantly intrigued with the moves they make since they were sold. Here they are like the total opposite of the Seahawks. They already took their Oline from one of the worst to one of the best. So what's their big off season move this time? Well lets invest more in the Oline, wild
Their biggest move was a bold trade of third- and seventh-round picks, a future second-round pick and a swap of fourth-round picks for Tunsil. The irony of the trade was that Houston badly needs offensive line help, and the Commanders didn't have to upgrade -- Brandon Coleman posted above average pass block and run block win rates as a rookie last season. But Tunsil is a high-end pass blocker despite leading all players in penalties last season.
Continually focusing on the O Line isn't that intriguing, in my opinion. It's what good teams do. Seattle goes cheap and then makes excuses. Schneider is a douche bag who's act has worn out if you ask me. There are five starters on the O Line. Name another unit that starts five? If you have a Nickel back you could say the secondary. But otherwise? Investing in the O Line is just smart football. Something that is apparently lost here....yet no one cares.
- Donn Beach
- Posts: 16940
- Joined: Thu May 02, 2019 1:06 am
Re: Grubb didn't put anything in motion
the thing that wins football games is depth, with all the concern with Lucas' health there was absolutely no depth behind him. At one point they had to go with that guy, the rookie making his first NFL start that hadn't played division one ball, that's insane. And again, it was obvious they were going to need help there. It gets used as an excuse, the Oline suffered injuries, well duh.
That's probably the most important aspect to what Peters is doing
That's probably the most important aspect to what Peters is doing
The former veteran tight end of eight NFL seasons pointed out the obvious that Laremy Tunsil and Josh Conerly are the headlines. "But to me, the thing that makes this group different is the fact that maybe you have ten dudes who can play ball for you in a pinch."
Then, remembering another, he said, "And we haven't talked about Chris Paul yet." Hoffman interjected, "I don't know how Michael Deiter (G/C) makes the roster. And Michael Deiter has been in the NFL a long time. That's a good thing."
- Donn Beach
- Posts: 16940
- Joined: Thu May 02, 2019 1:06 am
Re: Grubb didn't put anything in motion
and its interesting too, if there's a guy that likes a good offensive line its Sean Payton, as opposed to JS. And there they are PFF has the Broncos 2nd. That didn't take Payton long to do