Page 2 of 3
Re: Hawks going after McDowell's signing bonus
Posted: Thu May 30, 2019 6:57 pm
by D-train
auroraave wrote: ↑Thu May 30, 2019 6:42 pm
D-train wrote: ↑Thu May 30, 2019 5:36 pm
auroraave wrote: ↑Thu May 30, 2019 5:25 pm
It's a breach of contract. Non-football related injuries/activities prevented him from providing the services Seattle paid him for. He doesn't get to say 'whoops' and keep the money. Why would they not recoup their loss? They'll win this easily.
Allen was worth $20B when he died. $800k is .004% of that. It would be like someone with $1 million net worth suing someone for 40 bucks. Why bother. I would chalk it up as a cost of doing business and move on. Most likely Malik never gets another NFL contract so it is likely a a blood from a turnip deal as well.
It counts against the cap. They have to recoup it.
That would be a good reason. I thought about that but then thought it would count regardless if they recouped it or not. Seems like a convoluted thing for the NFL to track. Do the Hawks have to take a screen shot of their bank account proving they got the money back and send it to NFL HQ or what. lol
Re: Hawks going after McDowell's signing bonus
Posted: Fri May 31, 2019 2:04 am
by Hanjag
D-train wrote: ↑Thu May 30, 2019 5:36 pm
auroraave wrote: ↑Thu May 30, 2019 5:25 pm
D-train wrote: ↑Thu May 30, 2019 5:09 pm
Seems a little odd to go after $800k that he has probably already spent. That is like one beer for every season ticket holder.
It's a breach of contract. Non-football related injuries/activities prevented him from providing the services Seattle paid him for. He doesn't get to say 'whoops' and keep the money. Why would they not recoup their loss? They'll win this easily.
Allen was worth $20B when he died. $800k is .004% of that. It would be like someone with $1 million net worth suing someone for 40 bucks. Why bother. I would chalk it up as a cost of doing business and move on. Most likely Malik never gets another NFL contract so it is likely a a blood from a turnip deal as well.
Have you ever seen video of people jumping the gates at New York subway stations? Yes, a majority of people do it. Cops show up. Nobody does not pay. If you let one employee get away with 800K, why wouldn't 1/2 the hot dog-beer concession workers just pocket all the cash.
Re: Hawks going after McDowell's signing bonus
Posted: Fri May 31, 2019 4:25 am
by D-train
Well for one, its against the law.
Re: Hawks going after McDowell's signing bonus
Posted: Fri May 31, 2019 5:38 am
by 57reasons
D-train wrote: ↑Thu May 30, 2019 6:57 pm
auroraave wrote: ↑Thu May 30, 2019 6:42 pm
It counts against the cap. They have to recoup it.
That would be a good reason. I thought about that but then thought it would count regardless if they recouped it or not. Seems like a convoluted thing for the NFL to track. Do the Hawks have to take a screen shot of their bank account proving they got the money back and send it to NFL HQ or what. lol
might be convoluted, but if you think about it, it's necessary. Otherwise you encourage gaming the system with a "wink, wink, nod, nod" approach where a team purports to claim repayment without ever intending to pursue collection.
Re: Hawks going after McDowell's signing bonus
Posted: Fri May 31, 2019 1:05 pm
by auroraave
what business, anywhere on earth, allows an employee who does not perform services, to walk away with $800,000? None. You have a fiduciary responsibility as a GM to the company. Ignoring that is a fireable offense. Paul Allen's net worth has nothing to do with it, and is neither a logical or legal position to take. It's their JOB to handle the finances correctly. Seattle has been awarded half of the 1.5 mill bonus, now they have to collect. They can garnish wages if he signs with another team - but it doesn't seem like anyone will clear him medically to play. Yet.
Re: Hawks going after McDowell's signing bonus
Posted: Fri May 31, 2019 2:50 pm
by D-train
Or they can garnish his Walmart greeter salary $800 a year for the next 1000 years. lol
Re: Hawks going after McDowell's signing bonus
Posted: Mon Jun 03, 2019 12:39 am
by roosevelt
LOL.
He doesn't appear to be Walmart material
Re: Hawks going after McDowell's signing bonus
Posted: Mon Jun 03, 2019 2:41 pm
by D-train
Re: Hawks going after McDowell's signing bonus
Posted: Mon Jun 03, 2019 2:43 pm
by D-train
More Wow.
Malik McDowell
Verified account
@MSU_LEEK4
Jun 1
More
At the end of the day I’m was cleared by a well respected neurologist and that’s that feel how you wanna feel....
77 replies 8 retweets 46 likes
Reply 77 Retweet 8 Like 46 Direct message
Malik McDowell
Verified account
@MSU_LEEK4
Jun 1
More
The @Seahawks had there own reasoning for not letting me play but my head was not issue
182 replies 33 retweets 91 likes
Reply 182 Retweet 33 Like 91 Direct message
Malik McDowell
Verified account
@MSU_LEEK4
Jun 1
More
Dr. Samuel R. Browd Seattle Children/Pediatric Neurologist
https://www.google.com/url?sa=t&source= ... 9wqyQbKW89 …
9 replies 1 retweet 5 likes
Reply 9 Retweet 1 Like 5 Direct message
Malik McDowell
Verified account
@MSU_LEEK4
Jun 1
More
One of the best Neurologist in the world cleared me too play football again Dr. Jeffrey Kutcher MD Neurologist vs The Seahawks Dr. Samuel R. Browd Seattle Children/Pediatric Neurologist who’s primary patients are under the age of 2
108 replies 20 retweets 53 likes
Reply 108 Retweet 20 Like 53 Direct message
Re: Hawks going after McDowell's signing bonus
Posted: Mon Jun 03, 2019 2:50 pm
by D-train
As I suspected, sounds like more than a business decision. Almost like they have a personal vendetta against him which is fine.
