Another writer plagiarizing the forum

[Michael K.]

except that it's not their job to conjecture prematurely. granted that doesnt stop some media, and as fans you have every right to, but not responsible for journalists to do that now without mentioning the big caveat that the offseason aint over. there's still every chance in the world to sign clowney or Griffen. and maybe Brown or Gordon, or even trade for Adams. and a veteran run stuffer, maybe even Dareus or Daniels.

So, if the Seahawks start off 0 and 2, or 1 and 3, or some crazy shit like that, the reporters shouldn't write anything because technically they aren't eliminated from the playoffs? There has been an off season, a lot of off season. There have been many moves made. THIS team has not gotten better. Not sure how reporting on that is in any way shape or form wrong.

[topcrickets]

I am against plagiarism

[D-train]

I am against plagiarism

I have already filed a class action lawsuit on behalf of the forum members. We will all be multi millionaires when the dust settles.

[D-train]

Don't worry about the DL boys. Bruce is on the case!

https://twitter.com/AaronQ13Fox/status/ ... 1862808576

[Michael K.]

Don't worry about the DL boys. Bruce is on the case!

https://twitter.com/AaronQ13Fox/status/ ... 1862808576

They might as well have asked Doug Baldwin if he thought the 2015 WR group was just "a ight".

[57reasons]

except that it's not their job to conjecture prematurely. granted that doesnt stop some media, and as fans you have every right to, but not responsible for journalists to do that now without mentioning the big caveat that the offseason aint over. there's still every chance in the world to sign clowney or Griffen. and maybe Brown or Gordon, or even trade for Adams. and a veteran run stuffer, maybe even Dareus or Daniels.

So, if the Seahawks start off 0 and 2, or 1 and 3, or some crazy shit like that, the reporters shouldn't write anything because technically they aren't eliminated from the playoffs? There has been an off season, a lot of off season. There have been many moves made. THIS team has not gotten better. Not sure how reporting on that is in any way shape or form wrong.

apples and peanuts. anything after the first whistle blows is fair game. and earlier sure, just be fair to include the caveat. btw i agree with y'all in my disappointment at the apparent miss on landing a half-way decent tackle, though i do think Schell is an upgrade - i think i'd be happier with most of my mocks on the simulator.

[D-train]

except that it's not their job to conjecture prematurely. granted that doesnt stop some media, and as fans you have every right to, but not responsible for journalists to do that now without mentioning the big caveat that the offseason aint over. there's still every chance in the world to sign clowney or Griffen. and maybe Brown or Gordon, or even trade for Adams. and a veteran run stuffer, maybe even Dareus or Daniels.

So, if the Seahawks start off 0 and 2, or 1 and 3, or some crazy shit like that, the reporters shouldn't write anything because technically they aren't eliminated from the playoffs? There has been an off season, a lot of off season. There have been many moves made. THIS team has not gotten better. Not sure how reporting on that is in any way shape or form wrong.

apples and peanuts. anything after the first whistle blows is fair game. and earlier sure, just be fair to include the caveat. btw i agree with y'all in my disappointment at the apparent miss on landing a half-way decent tackle, though i do think Schell is an upgrade - i think i'd be happier with most of my mocks on the simulator.

I coined apples and orangutans.......feel free to use but send me 25 cents each time for royalties.

[57reasons]

so noted

So, if the Seahawks start off 0 and 2, or 1 and 3, or some crazy shit like that, the reporters shouldn't write anything because technically they aren't eliminated from the playoffs? There has been an off season, a lot of off season. There have been many moves made. THIS team has not gotten better. Not sure how reporting on that is in any way shape or form wrong.

apples and peanuts. anything after the first whistle blows is fair game. and earlier sure, just be fair to include the caveat. btw i agree with y'all in my disappointment at the apparent miss on landing a half-way decent tackle, though i do think Schell is an upgrade - i think i'd be happier with most of my mocks on the simulator.

I coined apples and orangutans.......feel free to use but send me 25 cents each time for royalties.

So noted. feel free to deduct those from my $50 Mariner winnings.

[D-train]

so noted

apples and peanuts. anything after the first whistle blows is fair game. and earlier sure, just be fair to include the caveat. btw i agree with y'all in my disappointment at the apparent miss on landing a half-way decent tackle, though i do think Schell is an upgrade - i think i'd be happier with most of my mocks on the simulator.

I coined apples and orangutans.......feel free to use but send me 25 cents each time for royalties.

So noted. feel free to deduct those from my $50 Mariner winnings.

Or my incessant use of 57.

[57reasons]

so noted

I coined apples and orangutans.......feel free to use but send me 25 cents each time for royalties.

So noted. feel free to deduct those from my $50 Mariner winnings.

Or my incessant use of 57.

its ok. there's ALOT of good reasons to use that number.