Why Seattle and Dallas didn't want Earl

User avatar
D-train
Posts: 75952
Joined: Mon Apr 29, 2019 1:33 am
Location: Quincy, MA

Re: Why Seattle and Dallas didn't want Earl

Post by D-train » Thu Oct 01, 2020 2:59 am

57reasons wrote:
Thu Oct 01, 2020 2:27 am
TraderGary wrote:
Thu Oct 01, 2020 12:05 am
After all that has come out the past couple years, it's pretty clear Kam was the glue that held the LOB together. It's really too bad his career was cut short. One of my all-time favorite Hawks players.

As for E.T., until recently I hadn't realized what a head case he was. So glad we didn't extend him.
thing was Earl was always a little aloof but never really a head case till after SB 49 when the malcontents took center stage. as physical as he played (remember that hit on Gronk?), would not at all be surprised if there is some CTE in play in his case.
Yep he and AB seem to be two peas in a CTE Pod....
dt

Post Reply