It actually is an apt description. You are talking about what we don't know, what else MIGHT happen this off season. There is zero reason a reporter can't talk about what already has happened. Otherwise? No one should report anything about the Hawks from the day after they play their last game until the day before they play their next game. Because we don't know what else might happen?57reasons wrote: ↑Tue Jul 21, 2020 12:57 am
apples and peanuts. anything after the first whistle blows is fair game. and earlier sure, just be fair to include the caveat. btw i agree with y'all in my disappointment at the apparent miss on landing a half-way decent tackle, though i do think Schell is an upgrade - i think i'd be happier with most of my mocks on the simulator.
No one thinks the off season is over. There are just some of us that feel so far they have flat out blown an opportunity.