Seattle, Washington Prediction Thread

[D-train]

Yeah, when you score two TDs and go for 2 twice they would both have to fail for it to be worth less than the two kicks...

have you SEEN the Seahawks on 3rd down this year? not sure we'd score on 25% of 2-point conversions, much less half.

Yeah, with us the theory likely goes out the window....as they alternate between sideways passes and jet sweeps..

[SeattleAddict]

jet sweeps using DAVID FREAKING MOORE.

Wouldn't Lockett or DK be way better for that?

It's kinda like throwing it to Ricardo Lockette instead of handing off to Beast Mode.

Something about #83 that makes PC think they're the go-to guys???

[D-train]

jet sweeps using DAVID FREAKING MOORE.

Wouldn't Lockett or DK be way better for that?

It's kinda like throwing it to Ricardo Lockette instead of handing off to Beast Mode.

Something about #83 that makes PC think they're the go-to guys???

Yeah Moore couldn't break out of a wet paper bag let alone a tackle. Why not use the biggest AND fastest WR for that. Imagine DK coming around the corner the same speed and determination as when he caught Baker after a 107 yard sprint. Makes too much sense so of course they don't do it.

[D-train]

Check this out. Fascinating.....Dude bet $1550 on Northwestern to win over OSU. OSU was a 18 pt. fav. He will win $238k but they are offering him $71k to cash out now at halftime. NW is up 10-6.

https://twitter.com/darrenrovell/status ... 8354139137

[Sibelius Hindemith]

He somehow was able to cash out with $67k in the 3rd quarter before Ohio St showed up.

[SeattleAddict]

Geez the Packers look unstoppable.

[Gametime]

No to Lockett on end arounds. He looks like he breaks on every hit. So, no extra hits

[DavidGee24]

Geez the Packers look unstoppable.

Freaking Teddy Dishwater fumbling a QB sneak on 1st and goal at the one.

[Michael K.]

Yeah, when you score two TDs and go for 2 twice they would both have to fail for it to be worth less than the two kicks...

have you SEEN the Seahawks on 3rd down this year? not sure we'd score on 25% of 2-point conversions, much less half.

Yeah, with us the theory likely goes out the window....as they alternate between sideways passes and jet sweeps..

Its 50% every time. Teams could fail every time, and often do. This thought process that the point never matters is silly. I've seen more games where teams lose because they are chasing points all game that times they win because the 2 works.

[Bil522]

24-6 Hawks