Poll: Walker or Shaheed

Do you now wish that Walker could have been re-signed even if it meant losing Shaheed?

YES
5
63%
NO
3
38%
 
Total votes: 8

User avatar
Sibelius Hindemith
Posts: 16583
Joined: Thu May 02, 2019 3:09 am
Location: Seattle

Re: Poll: Walker vs Shaheed

Post by Sibelius Hindemith » Thu Sep 17, 2026 12:03 pm

Donn Beach wrote:
Thu Sep 17, 2026 3:42 am
Walker on when he decided he wasn't going to play in Seattle any longer. The guy didn't want to play for the seahawks, all this angst over a guy that didn't want to play there
"If I'm being honest, probably sometime during the season," Walker told Florio. "Things didn't work out how I was expecting them to, and that's alright. It worked out for the team. But yeah, sometime during the season. And then we get to free agency, and you're pretty much knowing you weren't going to be there."
That just sounds like the words of someone that was butthurt that he wasn't offered a big contract by his former team. He also said this right before the Superbowl...
“I've been here four years, so you know I've gotten to know a lot of stuff about Seattle, and you know a lot of the city, and I feel like they feel good about me as well,” he said. “So if it was my choice, though, I'd definitely stay.”
The reality is that none of us knows what he was thinking leading up to free agency. We do know, however, that the Seahawks weren't interested in paying him his value on the market because they didn't make on offer prior to the FA period, didn't attempt to match KC's offer later, and opted not to use the franchise or transition tags on him. Instead they decided to offer Shaheed a contract larger than what Walker got from KC.

User avatar
Sibelius Hindemith
Posts: 16583
Joined: Thu May 02, 2019 3:09 am
Location: Seattle

Re: Poll: Walker or Shaheed

Post by Sibelius Hindemith » Thu Sep 17, 2026 12:11 pm

Donn Beach wrote:
Thu Sep 17, 2026 4:26 am
LOVE Price but this has nothing to do with him. Could have Walker AND price right now instead of Shaheed
Yeah, it wasn't about walker or Shaheed. It also wasn't about ways to have kept walker. Walker didn't want to be a Seahawk, hard stop
You don't know that.

Of all the other signings/extensions that they prioritized above keeping Walker, the contract they offered Shaheed stands out because it was for a similar amount and same number of years, and his value was mainly as a special teams player. Had they signed Walker, it is my opinion that they wouldn't have made Shaheed that offer and that it was the most questionable one they made.

In any case, i never stated it was an either/or scenario for the Seahawks. I am simply posing the question "who would you rather have?".

Donn Beach
Posts: 20934
Joined: Thu May 02, 2019 1:06 am

Re: Poll: Walker or Shaheed

Post by Donn Beach » Thu Sep 17, 2026 12:41 pm

Sibelius Hindemith wrote:
Thu Sep 17, 2026 12:11 pm
Donn Beach wrote:
Thu Sep 17, 2026 4:26 am
LOVE Price but this has nothing to do with him. Could have Walker AND price right now instead of Shaheed
Yeah, it wasn't about walker or Shaheed. It also wasn't about ways to have kept walker. Walker didn't want to be a Seahawk, hard stop
You don't know that.

Of all the other signings/extensions that they prioritized above keeping Walker, the contract they offered Shaheed stands out because it was for a similar amount and same number of years, and his value was mainly as a special teams player. Had they signed Walker, it is my opinion that they wouldn't have made Shaheed that offer and that it was the most questionable one they made.

In any case, i never stated it was an either/or scenario for the Seahawks. I am simply posing the question "who would you rather have?".
Did you miss that? Walker decided midway through the season he didn't want to play there anymore
"If I'm being honest, probably sometime during the season," Walker told Florio. "Things didn't work out how I was expecting them to, and that's alright. It worked out for the team. But yeah, sometime during the season. And then we get to free agency, and you're pretty much knowing you weren't going to be there

Post Reply