Post Mortem: Sea v KC & The Sunshine Band

[Michael K.]

Well the Seahawks won a SB last season while leading the league in turnovers. TOs aren't good but on the other hand, I don't think you play just to avoid them, its controlled aggression

That's an attack? give me a break.

Attack, not an attack, what ever. You sure banged on that fucking idiotic drum for a long time. Again, did you actually believe fans in here thought the only way Seattle could win is if they NEVER turned the ball over? Why is it that I have listed to you the really bad, BONEHEADED turnovers that have cost us ball games? You never addressed it. Just continued to quote shit with out attributing it to a source, in the same lame ass vague "what did I do?" bullshit Donn way you always do. It's absolutely mind-numbingly stupid.

Then? It was about explosives. So I showed you how explosive he was in the Commanders loss and how pedestrian Nix was when Denver beat us. Crickets from you. You are ridiculous.

[Donn Beach]

That isn't what I said and again I'm not going down your rabbit hole of trying to defend against another strawman of yours. What i was getting at is the relationship between turnovers on one hand and aggressive play on the other. I think it's interesting to look at. Its interesting that Darnold could both lead the league in turnovers and be highly effective running the offense last season. Particularly in terms of the anylitcs aimed at it these days. And it had absolutely nothing to do with attacking anybody. Swear to God, it be nice to just have a conversation without it being about defending against your strawman arguments. Trying to characterize that comment as an attack on Aurora does take the cake.

But that's OK, that's going to be the standard for civilized discussion? OK, I'm willing to try and live up to it, how about you?

What did you call me yesterday, asshat?...goofy ass? That wasn't very civilized Michael. Show me anywhere over all the years of discussion where I've addressed you like that. If your going to be this concerned about attacking other posters are you willing to follow the same standards? It would seem a bit hypocritical not to seems to me.

[Michael K.]

I wasn't concerned about attacking posters. I said you attacked his post about NO TURNOVERS, and you focused entirely on it, and refused to address anything else.

I saw what you said, and told you that wasn't the case....we are upset about the DUMB TURNOVERS.

Instead of addressing that? You decided to go into explosive plays. I showed you how turnovers lost us a game when the QB was explosive, and how Denver wasn't explosive at all, but let their defense beat us.

You refused to address it. Again, you are either intentionally being a pain in the ass, or you don't know you are a pain in the ass. Either way Donn? You are a pain in the ass. I don't give a fuck if you get butt hurt by that or not.

[Michael K.]

Sam Darnold wins.
A hapless no win Charger team. 13 of 22 168 yards 2 TDs 1 INT. He threw the INT on the first play and then? They let him throw it 21 more times is all!
A very good Chiefs team. 20 of 28 257 yards 1 TD and 1 INT. That INT was a bad one to almost hand the Chiefs three points before the half.
From AI

Sam Darnold threw 10 passes in the second half against the Kansas City Chiefs on October 25, 2026

Ten fucking passes. His coach realized he lost the Broncos game and that he doesn't need him to win the Chief's game!

Darnold losses.
Against a hapless Commanders team that has beaten NO ONE ELSE? 31 of 45 379 yards and 4 TDs and 2 real bad INTS. Pretty sure 24 points directly off turnovers, one was a pick six on a dogshit throw.
Against the division leading 49ers? 18 or 29 195 yards 1 TD and 2 very bad INTs. Pretty sure it was 21 points directly off turnovers. One turnover by the RB in the endzone resulting in a TD.
Against the Denver Broncos? 27 of 51 278 yards 0 TDs and 2 horrible INTs. The opposing QB looked like a Pop Warner kid, but didn't turn the ball over.

What part of that screams...."what I should reply to the guys in here is that if Sam just made more explosives....."? What part of what AA said actually made you think "he really thinks we should never turn the ball over and we shouldn't play aggressive at all."? The issue is, I don't think you think that at all. I think you try to stir the pot and then cry victim. "I didn't say that" "take it up with Pete". Ive QUOTED you before and you've told me you didn't say that. It feels intentional, so I am sorry, but when you get like this, and claim I'm going down a rabbit hole?

I've countered A few things. One? That no one is saying they will not turn the ball over ever. Again, if you believe that? I can't help you. Two, don't you believe that if they just cut out the completely avoidable STUPID turnovers, they'd be undefeated. And finally, three...how the fuck can you point to explosives when we lost to Bo Nix when he did nothing but rely on his defense and we lost to the Commanders when Darnold did have explosives.

Instead of answering, you go off on how that is a rabbit hole. I am DIRECTLY responding to shit you've typed. So, if I'm done a rabbit hole it's because you dug it and dove in.

[auroraave]

Per coach Mac - Price back to practice - realistic shot to play Monday,. Zabel moving to right guard.

[Nwadventure]

I just need a W on Monday- Thanks