I will miss Parkinson. Perhaps Mabry will assume a larger role. But this team has never really utilized tight ends all that much anyway.
Free Agency thread
Re: Free Agency thread
Re: Free Agency thread
Yes, I liked Parkinson and expect him to do well with the Rams. But I would rather have Queen than Parkinson and Brooks which is about the same amount of money.
dt
Re: Free Agency thread
Queen would be a solid acquisition, in my opinion.
Re: Free Agency thread
Yep this would give you a bad ass D Lineman in Big Cat, a bad ass LB in Queen, a bad ass CB in Spoon. Just need a bad ass safety.
dt
Re: Free Agency thread
I agree, another safety would be nice. I think Love will be better this year, not having to share time with the inept Adams. Also, Diggs was not playing well and that effected the whole backfield. So, get another solid Safety and lets roll.
Re: Free Agency thread
Speaking of the Ravens, if we're going to steal Macdonald and sign Queen, why not go after Huntley as well?
Re: Free Agency thread
Lock going to Giants 1yr/$5mill
Re: Free Agency thread
All the more reason to go after Huntley.
-
- Posts: 11520
- Joined: Wed May 01, 2019 5:27 am
Re: Free Agency thread
Wow, maybe MacDonald knows something we don't? Or we are just being fucking cheap for some reason.D-train wrote: ↑Tue Mar 12, 2024 6:08 pmDamn it. How did we not beat this??
https://www.si.com/nfl/bengals/news/pit ... rick-queen