Day 2 Draft thread

[Sibelius Hindemith]

Yeah right Woolen was depth. Your best cover corner
Mafe was depth, but also one of the top two pass rushers at Edge along with Hall.
And Walker a top 10 RB...

[Donn Beach]

Woolen wasn't a starter, Charbonnet is ranked basically as highly as Walker at pff. They were good players but they weren't key players. Those are the players you churn through on a team. They are replacable

[Sibelius Hindemith]

How the hell do you pass on this guy at 96 jusf so you can add a 7th rounder?

I'm going to follow this guy and if he turns into even a barely average starting OG expect to be reminded of it in every game thread where Bradford is the starting RG next season.

[Sibelius Hindemith]

Woolen wasn't a starter, Charbonnet is ranked basically as highly as Walker at pff. They were good players but they weren't key players. Those are the players you churn through on a team. They are replacable

Walker sure as heck looked like a key player in the playoffs and SB.

[Sibelius Hindemith]

Basically, the Seahawks compared to last year are now...

Same at QB, TE, WR, OL, DL, ILB, S
Worse at CB, RB, EDGE

Don't see a repeat coming...

I suppose they could be improved on the D line with the addition of Mills but there may be some drop off with Reed and Williams who are both in their 30s. And same thing at WR with Horton back but Kupp on the downside.

[D-train]

It's more than adding or subtracting players, the process itself gets improved on, developed. Both the offense and defense can continue to develop. I think the offense becomes more pass oriented, Rasheed is combined more effectively, the TEs they have on the roster are utilized more, Darnold improves. And the defense, its not like MM has been at this long. I think that's just beginning. The thing that concerns me really is the turnover at OC. Really the players they lost were basically depth pieces.

I am more than fine with the draft so far but wtf are you talking about???

Well it's a stretch including walker but I'm not that concerned over who they lost nor do I think is JS. They weren't All Pros, Woolen, Mafe, Bryant...that to me is depth

So you think there are All Pros which is about 3% of starters and the rest are depth??? They were all starters. That is not depth.

[Donn Beach]

I am more than fine with the draft so far but wtf are you talking about???

Well it's a stretch including walker but I'm not that concerned over who they lost nor do I think is JS. They weren't All Pros, Woolen, Mafe, Bryant...that to me is depth

So you think there are All Pros which is about 3% of starters and the rest are depth??? They were all starters. That is not depth.

you consider Woolen and Mafe starters?

[Donn Beach]

Basically, the Seahawks compared to last year are now...

Same at QB, TE, WR, OL, DL, ILB, S
Worse at CB, RB, EDGE

Don't see a repeat coming...

I suppose they could be improved on the D line with the addition of Mills but there may be some drop off with Reed and Williams who are both in their 30s. And same thing at WR with Horton back but Kupp on the downside.

In my mind they should clearly be better at receiver. They added Rasheed, I think their TEs will continue to develop. It's up to the OC to utilize them. I'm not sure why Kupp is still on the team.

[D-train]

How the hell do you pass on this guy at 96 jusf so you can add a 7th rounder?


Screenshot_20260425_074600_Chrome.jpg


I'm going to follow this guy and if he turns into even a barely average starting OG expect to be reminded of it in every game thread where Bradford is the starting RG next season.

I thought you wanted a CB.

[Donn Beach]

“They were physically tougher and stronger”

Those are the words of Cris Collinsworth on the NBC Broadcast, towards the end of Seattle’s Super Bowl win over the Patriots

I think Bradford might fit that