Our non existent pass rush
Our non existent pass rush
It seems to me to be due to poor defensive scheming or a lot of players owe us some change. Clowny has been solid but he appears to be a living tribute to how good J.J. Watt really is. There should be a combo of down line players that works but it hasn't. Any quarterback given forever to throw is going to be successful and the real good ones are gong to tear us apart. 400 plus yards for a back up? If we are going to be giving up all that yardage I'd at least prefer we do it with all kinds of blitz packages.
Re: Our non existent pass rush
Clowney is the most double teamed player in football this year. Not sure what you meanAZOldDawg wrote: ↑Wed Oct 30, 2019 11:59 pmIt seems to me to be due to poor defensive scheming or a lot of players owe us some change. Clowny has been solid but he appears to be a living tribute to how good J.J. Watt really is. There should be a combo of down line players that works but it hasn't. Any quarterback given forever to throw is going to be successful and the real good ones are gong to tear us apart. 400 plus yards for a back up? If we are going to be giving up all that yardage I'd at least prefer we do it with all kinds of blitz packages.
-
- Posts: 936
- Joined: Wed May 01, 2019 2:23 am
Re: Our non existent pass rush
Besides Clowney, the rest of the line has been trash. I'm leaning more towards scheme cause Norton had Khalil Mack in Oakland and still sucked
Re: Our non existent pass rush
Wow, great point.Hasslecracked wrote: ↑Thu Oct 31, 2019 12:06 amBesides Clowney, the rest of the line has been trash. I'm leaning more towards scheme cause Norton had Khalil Mack in Oakland and still sucked
dt
Re: Our non existent pass rush
Mack won DPOY when Norton was there.D-train wrote: ↑Thu Oct 31, 2019 12:39 amWow, great point.Hasslecracked wrote: ↑Thu Oct 31, 2019 12:06 amBesides Clowney, the rest of the line has been trash. I'm leaning more towards scheme cause Norton had Khalil Mack in Oakland and still sucked
Re: Our non existent pass rush
Gruden said the D sucked with him though. That's why he was willing to trade him.ThePro wrote: ↑Thu Oct 31, 2019 1:18 amMack won DPOY when Norton was there.D-train wrote: ↑Thu Oct 31, 2019 12:39 amWow, great point.Hasslecracked wrote: ↑Thu Oct 31, 2019 12:06 amBesides Clowney, the rest of the line has been trash. I'm leaning more towards scheme cause Norton had Khalil Mack in Oakland and still sucked
dt
-
- Posts: 11542
- Joined: Wed May 01, 2019 5:27 am
Re: Our non existent pass rush
Mack was good, the Raiders D was average. Our scheme up front leaves a lot to be desired.
Re: Our non existent pass rush
Whoever you get as coordinator is only going to have so much input with Carroll there . It's not like Norton has free reign. Carroll is pretty much the D coordinator.
-
- Posts: 11542
- Joined: Wed May 01, 2019 5:27 am
-
- Posts: 936
- Joined: Wed May 01, 2019 2:23 am
Re: Our non existent pass rush
With DPOY the defense was ranked 20th in the leauge. That's badThePro wrote: ↑Thu Oct 31, 2019 1:18 amMack won DPOY when Norton was there.D-train wrote: ↑Thu Oct 31, 2019 12:39 amWow, great point.Hasslecracked wrote: ↑Thu Oct 31, 2019 12:06 amBesides Clowney, the rest of the line has been trash. I'm leaning more towards scheme cause Norton had Khalil Mack in Oakland and still sucked