Rate the position groups
- Sibelius Hindemith
- Posts: 11451
- Joined: Thu May 02, 2019 3:09 am
- Location: Seattle
Rate the position groups
Use the 1-10 scale or, if you prefer, you may substitute the following descriptive terms:
10) supercalifragilisticexpialidocious
9) freakin' awesome
8) excellent
7) groovy
6) gnarly
5) meh
4) poor
3) lousy
2) dreadful
1) bloody awful
So here is mine:
QB: 6
RB: 7
WR: 8
TE: 5
OL: 4
DL: 2
Edge: 5
LB: 5
DB: 7
ST: 6
I will average out the scores from all contributors in order to harness the cumulative knowledge and football acumen of this forum and mold it into one unified intellect, a giant football brain if you will.
10) supercalifragilisticexpialidocious
9) freakin' awesome
8) excellent
7) groovy
6) gnarly
5) meh
4) poor
3) lousy
2) dreadful
1) bloody awful
So here is mine:
QB: 6
RB: 7
WR: 8
TE: 5
OL: 4
DL: 2
Edge: 5
LB: 5
DB: 7
ST: 6
I will average out the scores from all contributors in order to harness the cumulative knowledge and football acumen of this forum and mold it into one unified intellect, a giant football brain if you will.
Last edited by Sibelius Hindemith on Sun May 07, 2023 5:50 pm, edited 5 times in total.
-
- Posts: 11418
- Joined: Wed May 01, 2019 5:27 am
Re: Rate the position groups (assuming 4-3 D)
Here is mine:
QB: 7 (we return a Pro Bowler that is happy to be here and plays within the offense)
RB: 8 (young studs that IMO, compliment each other well)
WR: 9 (I think we will have the best trio in the league)
TE: 6 (I thought we had real good contributions from them last year, and that was with a much less talented WR core, IMO)
OL: 6 (Another Guard from LSU? Don't mind if I do)
DL: 3 (Need bodies, but great start in FA)
LB: 5 (might be too high)
DB: 8 (pumped about LOB 2.0)
ST: 6 (need some return game spark, but the way the game is played today, who has a return game)
I am not as down on the O Line as some. I am also not as down on the D Line as many, but we don't have enough players on the D Line to really rate it much higher than I did. I like the kid we drafted from Auburn, and Bush is a good addition at LB, but not a lot really blows me away with our LBs...but Bobbie, so I needed to rate that position group a little higher than you did. I think this new coaching staff will use Bobbie a lot more like the Rams did then that dumb ass Norton Jr did.
I am sure I am jinxing our DBs, but with those CBs and the talent we have at Safety? How do I not bump that grade up a bit. I love our kicking game, just not our return game, so I agree with you that ST is just "gnarly". LOL
QB: 7 (we return a Pro Bowler that is happy to be here and plays within the offense)
RB: 8 (young studs that IMO, compliment each other well)
WR: 9 (I think we will have the best trio in the league)
TE: 6 (I thought we had real good contributions from them last year, and that was with a much less talented WR core, IMO)
OL: 6 (Another Guard from LSU? Don't mind if I do)
DL: 3 (Need bodies, but great start in FA)
LB: 5 (might be too high)
DB: 8 (pumped about LOB 2.0)
ST: 6 (need some return game spark, but the way the game is played today, who has a return game)
I am not as down on the O Line as some. I am also not as down on the D Line as many, but we don't have enough players on the D Line to really rate it much higher than I did. I like the kid we drafted from Auburn, and Bush is a good addition at LB, but not a lot really blows me away with our LBs...but Bobbie, so I needed to rate that position group a little higher than you did. I think this new coaching staff will use Bobbie a lot more like the Rams did then that dumb ass Norton Jr did.
I am sure I am jinxing our DBs, but with those CBs and the talent we have at Safety? How do I not bump that grade up a bit. I love our kicking game, just not our return game, so I agree with you that ST is just "gnarly". LOL
Re: Rate the position groups (assuming 4-3 D)
Assuming 4-3 defense we have 12 D lineman for fours spots. Seems like a lot of bodies.....
dt
- Sibelius Hindemith
- Posts: 11451
- Joined: Thu May 02, 2019 3:09 am
- Location: Seattle
- Sibelius Hindemith
- Posts: 11451
- Joined: Thu May 02, 2019 3:09 am
- Location: Seattle
Re: Rate the position groups
Let's see yer ratings ya lily-livered wretches!
Re: Rate the position groups
Days shouldn't there be three position groups for the front seven? Traditional linebackers Edge rushers and true D lineman
dt
- Sibelius Hindemith
- Posts: 11451
- Joined: Thu May 02, 2019 3:09 am
- Location: Seattle
Re: Rate the position groups
Who would you list as Edge guys?
- Sibelius Hindemith
- Posts: 11451
- Joined: Thu May 02, 2019 3:09 am
- Location: Seattle
Re: Rate the position groups
I would assume...
Taylor, Mafe, Hall, Robinson, Smith
How about Nwosu?
Taylor, Mafe, Hall, Robinson, Smith
How about Nwosu?
- Sibelius Hindemith
- Posts: 11451
- Joined: Thu May 02, 2019 3:09 am
- Location: Seattle
Re: Rate the position groups
I added edge to the list.
Re: Rate the position groups
Edge is not a separate position group. It's all defensive line. If you are doing that, then you need to separate inside v outside linebacker groups and corner v safety group and guard v tackle groups. Why make the distinction for the defensive line? That's being inconsistant.