Not included in this list of Nat. Championship contenders
-
- Posts: 12799
- Joined: Wed May 01, 2019 5:27 am
Re: Not included in this list of Nat. Championship contenders
Obviously don’t think very highly of the PAC 12. Highest is USC at 7. No one else higher than 12.
Re: Not included in this list of Nat. Championship contenders
I would say that if you are 6th you are a NC Contender. Don't know this guy though. lol
dt
Re: Not included in this list of Nat. Championship contenders
Huskies 11th in the coaches poll.
Full preseason USA Today Coaches Poll (first-place votes)
Georgia (61)
Michigan
Alabama (4)
Ohio State (1)
LSU
USC
Penn State
Florida State
Clemson
Tennessee
Washington
Texas
Notre Dame
Utah
Oregon
TCU
Kansas State
Oregon State
Oklahoma
North Carolina
Wisconsin
Mississippi
Tulane
Texas Tech
Texas A&M
dt
-
- Posts: 12799
- Joined: Wed May 01, 2019 5:27 am
Re: Not included in this list of Nat. Championship contenders
Klatt does a lot of college football games. I think he works with Brock a lot, but I could be wrong on that one. He seems to know his stuff, though I think sixth might be a bit high right now. I need to see the new blood on defense and how well the new guys on the O Line perform before I am ready to put us that high. Penix barely got touched last year. Yes, some of that is on him and his abilities, but the O Line was great. And the defense was DogShit. I need to see how our back seven covers before I am ready to say sixth in the nation. Just too many question marks. The schedule is harder. Luckily we have Oregon and Utah at home, but at USC is not a good one for us. I am very interested to see DeBoer's guys against USC. Sark always had our kids ready, but Pete? Man, I still have nightmares of how ridiculously soft we were during the Final 4 year. That game was SOO hard to watch.
-
- Posts: 12799
- Joined: Wed May 01, 2019 5:27 am
Re: Not included in this list of Nat. Championship contenders
Not going to lie, I'm a bit shocked the media has us ahead of Oregon and Utah. And Oklahoma at 20? Wow. I won't pretend to know a damn thing about what Oklahoma has this year, but they are usually guaranteed to be ranked in the top 10 in preseason. Losing Lincoln Riley has been rough on them I guess? Seems they aren't expected to make much noise in their last year in the Big 12? According to that poll, if the realignment happened now? Utah would be the favorite to win the new Big 12 and Washington would project to fifth in the Big 10!
-
- Posts: 12799
- Joined: Wed May 01, 2019 5:27 am
Re: Not included in this list of Nat. Championship contenders
Every poll since 36. Wow. That formula would be cool to see by decade.
Re: Not included in this list of Nat. Championship contenders
Why do you think WSU isn't on it?Michael K. wrote: ↑Sat Aug 19, 2023 9:32 pmEvery poll since 36. Wow. That formula would be cool to see by decade.

dt
-
- Posts: 12799
- Joined: Wed May 01, 2019 5:27 am