We're number #1

User avatar
D-train
Posts: 67909
Joined: Mon Apr 29, 2019 1:33 am
Location: Quincy, MA

We're number #1

Post by D-train » Mon Jul 11, 2022 10:12 pm

Not sure this is a good thing.
dt

User avatar
Walla Walla Dawg II
Posts: 2355
Joined: Sat Mar 06, 2021 12:29 am
Location: Southeastern Washington

Re: We're number #1

Post by Walla Walla Dawg II » Mon Jul 11, 2022 11:09 pm

That has to be bullshit dude.

If the expenses are per player then an away game would cost UW:
$103,437 x 115 = $11,895,255 per game.

Multiply that by 7 for a season (assuming bowl game)
$83,266,785

Yes, that would be 83 million dollars per season.

Now if the number of $103,437 per away game for the team, I would believe that.

User avatar
Walla Walla Dawg II
Posts: 2355
Joined: Sat Mar 06, 2021 12:29 am
Location: Southeastern Washington

Re: We're number #1

Post by Walla Walla Dawg II » Mon Jul 11, 2022 11:10 pm

Or a clerical error for the UW with whoever calculated it.

User avatar
D-train
Posts: 67909
Joined: Mon Apr 29, 2019 1:33 am
Location: Quincy, MA

Re: We're number #1

Post by D-train » Tue Jul 12, 2022 10:25 am

Walla Walla Dawg II wrote:
Mon Jul 11, 2022 11:09 pm
That has to be bullshit dude.

If the expenses are per player then an away game would cost UW:
$103,437 x 115 = $11,895,255 per game.

Multiply that by 7 for a season (assuming bowl game)
$83,266,785

Yes, that would be 83 million dollars per season.

Now if the number of $103,437 per away game for the team, I would believe that.
It is per season.
dt

Captain 97
Posts: 2732
Joined: Mon May 06, 2019 9:23 pm

Re: We're number #1

Post by Captain 97 » Tue Jul 12, 2022 6:14 pm

I think that's $103.437 not $103,437

User avatar
Walla Walla Dawg II
Posts: 2355
Joined: Sat Mar 06, 2021 12:29 am
Location: Southeastern Washington

Re: We're number #1

Post by Walla Walla Dawg II » Tue Jul 12, 2022 7:07 pm

Captain 97 wrote:
Tue Jul 12, 2022 6:14 pm
I think that's $103.437 not $103,437
So that would be one hundred three dollars and four hundred thirty seven cents?

:lol: :lol: :lol:

Captain 97
Posts: 2732
Joined: Mon May 06, 2019 9:23 pm

Re: We're number #1

Post by Captain 97 » Tue Jul 12, 2022 8:57 pm

Walla Walla Dawg II wrote:
Tue Jul 12, 2022 7:07 pm
Captain 97 wrote:
Tue Jul 12, 2022 6:14 pm
I think that's $103.437 not $103,437
So that would be one hundred three dollars and four hundred thirty seven cents?

:lol: :lol: :lol:
43.7 cents

User avatar
D-train
Posts: 67909
Joined: Mon Apr 29, 2019 1:33 am
Location: Quincy, MA

Re: We're number #1

Post by D-train » Tue Jul 12, 2022 9:42 pm

Captain 97 wrote:
Tue Jul 12, 2022 6:14 pm
I think that's $103.437 not $103,437
You might need readers. That is a comma my friend.

btw All a savvy AD would need to move up the ranks is go with a 1920s style 11 man roster. lol
dt

User avatar
Sibelius Hindemith
Posts: 11265
Joined: Thu May 02, 2019 3:09 am
Location: Seattle

Re: We're number #1

Post by Sibelius Hindemith » Fri Jul 15, 2022 3:21 pm

UW football is doomed now. At best their future is to be a Big Ten Bitch like Northwestern, Indiana and Rutgers. And they could well end up as a "power" player in a WAC type conference instead.

User avatar
ddraig
Posts: 5190
Joined: Mon May 06, 2019 1:17 am

Re: We're number #1

Post by ddraig » Fri Jul 29, 2022 2:06 am

Sibelius Hindemith wrote:
Fri Jul 15, 2022 3:21 pm
UW football is doomed now. At best their future is to be a Big Ten Bitch like Northwestern, Indiana and Rutgers. And they could well end up as a "power" player in a WAC type conference instead.
Um, I think the UW is a better program than any of the three you mentioned. We can compete favorably with Texas, Oklahoma, Oklahoma State, and are far better than Northwestern, Indiana, and Rutgers. Besides, it's likely Oregon, Cal, and Stanford use our coattails and those three ain't patsies, either.

Post Reply