Get woke go broke 2.0

User avatar
Sibelius Hindemith
Posts: 12852
Joined: Thu May 02, 2019 3:09 am
Location: Seattle

Re: Get woke go broke 2.0

Post by Sibelius Hindemith » Sun Jan 21, 2024 4:10 pm

They just need to put a fat hairy bearded dude in a bikini on their cover and go out with a bang. The left destroys everything (good).

User avatar
D-train
Posts: 73479
Joined: Mon Apr 29, 2019 1:33 am
Location: Quincy, MA

Re: Get woke go broke 2.0

Post by D-train » Sun Jan 21, 2024 8:02 pm

Sibelius Hindemith wrote:
Sun Jan 21, 2024 4:10 pm
They just need to put a fat hairy bearded dude in a bikini on their cover and go out with a bang. The left destroys everything (good).
How crazy is it that Playgirl Magazine used to be a thing. lol
dt

User avatar
D-train
Posts: 73479
Joined: Mon Apr 29, 2019 1:33 am
Location: Quincy, MA

Re: Get woke go broke 2.0

Post by D-train » Sun Jan 21, 2024 8:04 pm

Oh That's why. lol
Playgirl was an American magazine that featured general interest articles, lifestyle and celebrity news, in addition to nude or semi-nude men. In the 1970s and 1980s, the magazine printed monthly and was marketed mainly to women, although it had a significant gay male readership.[1]

History
The magazine was founded in 1973[2] by Douglas Lambert during the height of the feminist movement as a response to erotic men's magazines such as Playboy and Penthouse that featured similar photos of women. In 1977, Lambert sold Playgirl to Ira Ritter who took over as publisher. The magazine covered issues like abortion and equal rights, interspersed with sexy shots of men, and played a pivotal role in the sexual revolution for women.[3]

From March 2009 to February 2010, Playgirl appeared only online. The magazine returned to print as a sometime quarterly beginning with its March 2010 issue. The final print issue was Winter 2016. As of 2016, the magazine had only approximately 3,000 subscribers.[4] :lol:
dt

DanielVogelbach
Posts: 748
Joined: Sat Jun 08, 2019 7:43 pm

Re: Get woke go broke 2.0

Post by DanielVogelbach » Mon Jan 22, 2024 12:26 am

Sports Illustrated swimsuit is a good example of how they're making it bad on purpose. Agenda before profits. I mean, not that the original was the most wholesome thing, either. But, at least you could easily make the connection that the sports fans were men and they would enjoy some soft porn.

What executive making millions a year can't figure out the fans aren't gonna want these fatties on the cover? Ever heard of a focus group? They don't need a focus group; they got AI scanning Facebook and Twitter (I don't call it the new name). So, they already know the reaction. They already know it's gonna piss people off in the name of woke inclusion. They're not dumb. They're making it BAD ON PURPOSE. Same as the movies like I was trying to tell ya. It's a spiritual war. Stay strong out there!

Post Reply