JFK assassination revisited

Which theory do you believe most likely?

Oswald acted alone
4
40%
CIA / LBJ plot
5
50%
Mafia plot
0
No votes
Cuban nationalist plot
0
No votes
Other
1
10%
 
Total votes: 10

User avatar
bpj
Posts: 14647
Joined: Mon Apr 29, 2019 12:55 am

Re: JFK assassination revisited

Post by bpj » Sat Jul 12, 2025 1:58 am

Tucker Carlson has noticed the problem.

That's why they've resorted to smearing him as "Tucker Qatarlson".
https://x.com/Villgecrazylady/status/19 ... gcqyA&s=19

User avatar
Sibelius Hindemith
Posts: 14174
Joined: Thu May 02, 2019 3:09 am
Location: Seattle

Re: JFK assassination revisited

Post by Sibelius Hindemith » Sat Jul 12, 2025 4:03 pm

Recently available information about the CIA's involvement with Oswald...

https://www.axios.com/2025/07/05/cia-ag ... assination

User avatar
douche
Posts: 2505
Joined: Wed Oct 23, 2019 6:41 pm

Re: JFK assassination revisited

Post by douche » Tue Jul 15, 2025 8:28 pm

mostonmike wrote:
Tue Jun 03, 2025 9:18 pm
178 people in Dealey Plaza gave witness statements. This is where they thought the shots came from
49 Book Depository
21 Grassy Knoll
30 Elsewhere
78 Couldn’t tell
Effectively, nobody there had a fucking clue. So I always disregard the witness testimonies. The cameras of course do tell a story.

Here is my biggest thought. If the CIA or the US government were involved, could they really not think of something more clever than a crap shoot in front of hundreds of witnesses and hope that the public will believe it was this nutter? They would be better off driving him into a tunnel in Paris with a drunk driver at the helm. :roll:

Imagine that secret meeting, “Right lads, make the car drive past this big building where our nutter works. We will shoot him from behind a fence with a rifle and get our shooter to vanish. Trust me, everyone will believe it’s the nutter. Let’s do it….. “ As sarcastic as I am being, making it an accident would be far cleaner than putting a bullet in his head.

The CIA is not that dumb and not that smart to execute the leader in such a sloppy fashion.
As you say, nobody had a clue as to where the shots came from. It's interesting to think that out of 178 witness statements, the highest number (78) was 'couldn't tell'.

I was recently watching a clip with Sammy Gravano, outlining the murder of Paul Castellano outside Sparks Steak House in New York. Gravano was saying that they chose that spot on a busy street because people would panic and it would lend to the chaos. He said, "The shooters were there. The four of them wore long white trench coats and black fur Russian hats. You couldn't tell one guy from the other."

So it would appear that the idea to shoot JFK in a crowded area was the best way to do it.

User avatar
Walla Walla Dawg II
Posts: 3497
Joined: Sat Mar 06, 2021 12:29 am
Location: Southeastern Washington

Re: JFK assassination revisited

Post by Walla Walla Dawg II » Tue Jul 15, 2025 9:55 pm

The funny thing about 'hearing' a shot....

In the field you can tell the basic direction of the fired weapon. But when you put it among the high buildings (as it is in this instance), the sound bounces off of so many surfaces it's no wonder nobody knew where it could have come from.

Post Reply