A question to those who voted for Trump

[Sibelius Hindemith]

And they brought down the towers so that they would have an excuse to spend billions of dollars invading a country with no strategic significance (Iraq) and dropping bombs on some stone age barbarians in the mountains of Afghanistan? Or was it so that they would have an excuse to spy on ma and pa Kettle while allowing anyone from anywhere to sneak across the borders.

Yeah that really makies sense.

[DavidGee24]

And they brought down the towers so that they would have an excuse to spend billions of dollars invading a country with no strategic significance (Iraq) and dropping bombs on some stone age barbarians in the mountains of Afghanistan? Or was it so that they would have an excuse to spy on ma and pa Kettle while allowing anyone from anywhere to sneak across the borders.

Yeah that really makies sense.

And in broad daylight totally drawing it out so that thousands of people could film every single angle ensuring that their inside job would be exposed. "Hey everyone, lookit what we're doing! Come lynch us!"

Wackos never have an answer to this, they always just redirect.

[DanielVogelbach]

And they brought down the towers so that they would have an excuse to spend billions of dollars invading a country with no strategic significance (Iraq) and dropping bombs on some stone age barbarians in the mountains of Afghanistan? Or was it so that they would have an excuse to spy on ma and pa Kettle while allowing anyone from anywhere to sneak across the borders.

Yeah that really makies sense.

You never need the why to explain the what.

[DanielVogelbach]

And in broad daylight totally drawing it out so that thousands of people could film every single angle ensuring that their inside job would be exposed. "Hey everyone, lookit what we're doing! Come lynch us!"

Wackos never have an answer to this, they always just redirect.

This makes no sense. The whole idea was public display. What is there to redirect? The thing falls down at freefall speed. It's made of steel. It was a controlled demolition. There were no planes. Building 7. The passport. The inflated tire. The connecting flight with pilot's bag left behind. Figure out discernment.

[DanielVogelbach]

@iamlonefrog4866
23 hours ago
The fact that we are here in this day and age of technology and we STILL have "the question" is very telling. The further we make it into the future it will only become more apparent that this question is the secret baseline of truth for our realm. As for now we have to rely on a “space” program that, since its inception, has been allocated $650,000,000,000. So, it’s been like 53 years since we've last been to the moon, and the dog ate our trajectory data, which makes it extremely difficult to get back there. In the meantime let’s make plans to go to Mars.

simply put... you don’t have to know the truth to figure out you are being lied to

[douche]

And they brought down the towers so that they would have an excuse to spend billions of dollars invading a country with no strategic significance (Iraq) and dropping bombs on some stone age barbarians in the mountains of Afghanistan? Or was it so that they would have an excuse to spy on ma and pa Kettle while allowing anyone from anywhere to sneak across the borders.

Yeah that really makies sense.

Spending billions of taxpayer dollars to invade a country with no strategic significance makes perfect sense. It's your money they're spending to invade the country, but they're the ones profiting from it. If I remember correctly, Cheney and Halliburton made a fortune with Iraq. War profiteers.

Government is grift. When they're playing with taxpayer's money, cost is irrelevant. Tax money is leverage, the 'cost of doing business'. And we pay for it all while a select few become wealthy.

At least, that's the way I see it.

[Sibelius Hindemith]

So do you think they were willing to kill thousands of Americans (including service members) for this chance to make money, even at the risk of their scheme being uncovered and forever being regarded as evil monsters and knowing their descendants would suffer for it. I think that's a bit cynical.

[douche]

I think the government (and certainly scumbags like Cheney and Rumsfeld at the time) don't care about American citizens. I also think that they subscribe to the belief that American casualties are necessary collateral damage which helps to sell the narrative. Besides, Cheney and Rumsfeld didn't actually hurt or kill anyone themselves, the terrorists did it. The idea is to appeal to the public's emotions and get everyone riled up so they're not thinking clearly.

As far as the scheme being uncovered, it's more about selling the narrative of going to Iraq to catch the bad guys, thereby convincing the public that that is the scheme.

Have you ever noticed that anything goes under the guise of politics? Nothing is criminal if you're a politician. Government grift is better than organized crime.

And I agree, it all sounds cynical and disheartening, but I also don't think that Cheney or Rumsfeld care if anyone considers them to be evil monsters. Profit above everything.

[DavidGee24]

So do you think they were willing to kill thousands of Americans (including service members) for this chance to make money, even at the risk of their scheme being uncovered and forever being regarded as evil monsters and knowing their descendants would suffer for it. I think that's a bit cynical.

Risk/reward factor...

Reward: they make some money for some people

Risk: the fall of our government and the lynching of those involved

It's so funny how these fringe people who believe this shit actually believe that someone would come up with The Stupidest Plan Ever just because it's the plan that their brains would shit out.

[douche]

It's also hard to believe that a bunch of terrorists learned to fly airplanes in the US and got through airport security with box cutters. Alas.