Another Tranny Mass Shooting

[DavidGee24]

All you’ve demonstrated since you started posting here is that you have the intelligence of a used sponge.

May terrible, terrible things happen to people like you.

I've been posting here since the Seattle Times days. I just take breaks sometimes.

When you understand objective morality, you will understand that you are promoting satanism and the subjugation of the human race.

What was your screen name back then?

[DavidGee24]

Always have to be on the wrong side of the 90/10 issues..... all because conservatives are bad (or so you think).

Yeah wars against gay people... black people having civil rights... women voting... conservatives were sure on the right side of those 90/10 issues that eventually weren't.

And says the guy who said racism basically doesn't happen on any real scale at the moment:



Gee... look at the conservative likening black people to zoo animals. Not racist at all.

Okay, isn't this what we were talking about earlier, taking something that one individual person does and tying millions of other people to that person?

[Seattle or Bust]

Always have to be on the wrong side of the 90/10 issues..... all because conservatives are bad (or so you think).

Yeah wars against gay people... black people having civil rights... women voting... conservatives were sure on the right side of those 90/10 issues that eventually weren't.

And says the guy who said racism basically doesn't happen on any real scale at the moment:



Gee... look at the conservative likening black people to zoo animals. Not racist at all.

Okay, isn't this what we were talking about earlier, taking something that one individual person does and tying millions of other people to that person?

It's not one individual person.

A large bulk of Trump supporters who voted for Trump did so because of white supremacy. They like that he says shit with deeply racist undertones. I'm not sure how that can be disputed and conservatives who do not believe in that shit never denounce the diseased part of the party.

I just wish conservativism was so tied to and driven by hate of marginalized people. My entire life there's been big groups of people who hate gays, Muslims, Mexicans, Jews... what have you...

I mean jfc this forum has a couple members who hate jews with all of their being. One member just pointed to "satanism" and nobody, aside from me, thought to quote it and say, "bro, tf is wrong with you?"

[gil]

Always have to be on the wrong side of the 90/10 issues..... all because conservatives are bad (or so you think).

Yeah wars against gay people... black people having civil rights... women voting... conservatives were sure on the right side of those 90/10 issues that eventually weren't.

And says the guy who said racism basically doesn't happen on any real scale at the moment:



Gee... look at the conservative likening black people to zoo animals. Not racist at all.

Okay, isn't this what we were talking about earlier, taking something that one individual person does and tying millions of other people to that person?

Agree. One person saying something ridiculous and racist shouldn't taint all conservatives.

That said, I agree with Seattle or Bust that the "conservative" position was against civil rights for Blacks (and yes I know that many people who had that conservative position were southern Democrats) and that the conservative position was against women being able to vote.

So it's not a good look for conservatives when someone who is a popular (at least I think he is popular) "journalist" posts something like this.

I think the dynamic is similar on "both sides".
Step 1: The moderates are often hesitant to push back against the extreme voices on "their side."
Step 2: From the "other side", these extreme voices appear to be a greater percentage of people than they actually are.
Step 3: "The other side" gets demonized because of the extreme voices.

It's not healthy.

[Seattle or Bust]

Yeah wars against gay people... black people having civil rights... women voting... conservatives were sure on the right side of those 90/10 issues that eventually weren't.

And says the guy who said racism basically doesn't happen on any real scale at the moment:



Gee... look at the conservative likening black people to zoo animals. Not racist at all.

Okay, isn't this what we were talking about earlier, taking something that one individual person does and tying millions of other people to that person?

Agree. One person saying something ridiculous and racist shouldn't taint all conservatives.

That said, I agree with Seattle or Bust that the "conservative" position was against civil rights for Blacks (and yes I know that many people who had that conservative position were southern Democrats) and that the conservative position was against women being able to vote.

So it's not a good look for conservatives when someone who is a popular (at least I think he is popular) "journalist" posts something like this.

I think the dynamic is similar on "both sides".
Step 1: The moderates are often hesitant to push back against the extreme voices on "their side."
Step 2: From the "other side", these extreme voices appear to be a greater percentage of people than they actually are.
Step 3: "The other side" gets demonized because of the extreme voices.

It's not healthy.

I would caution against false equivalence.

Not having an aneurism because less than 40 trans women across the country are competing in female sports is not the same as vilifying a group of marginalized people and making up shit about them to scare people into hating them because they're "icky."

One side has to constantly protect marginalized people from the hate of the other side.

[gil]

Okay, isn't this what we were talking about earlier, taking something that one individual person does and tying millions of other people to that person?

Agree. One person saying something ridiculous and racist shouldn't taint all conservatives.

That said, I agree with Seattle or Bust that the "conservative" position was against civil rights for Blacks (and yes I know that many people who had that conservative position were southern Democrats) and that the conservative position was against women being able to vote.

So it's not a good look for conservatives when someone who is a popular (at least I think he is popular) "journalist" posts something like this.

I think the dynamic is similar on "both sides".
Step 1: The moderates are often hesitant to push back against the extreme voices on "their side."
Step 2: From the "other side", these extreme voices appear to be a greater percentage of people than they actually are.
Step 3: "The other side" gets demonized because of the extreme voices.

It's not healthy.

I would caution against false equivalence.

Not having an aneurism because less than 40 trans women across the country are competing in female sports is not the same as vilifying a group of marginalized people and making up shit about them to scare people into hating them because they're "icky."

One side has to constantly protect marginalized people from the hate of the other side.

Point taken.

But I'm waiting for someone to respond, "who is protecting white males who are straight?" Seriously.

[DavidGee24]

Okay, isn't this what we were talking about earlier, taking something that one individual person does and tying millions of other people to that person?

It's not one individual person.

A large bulk of Trump supporters who voted for Trump did so because of white supremacy. They like that he says shit with deeply racist undertones. I'm not sure how that can be disputed and conservatives who do not believe in that shit never denounce the diseased part of the party.

I just wish conservativism was so tied to and driven by hate of marginalized people. My entire life there's been big groups of people who hate gays, Muslims, Mexicans, Jews... what have you...

I mean jfc this forum has a couple members who hate jews with all of their being. One member just pointed to "satanism" and nobody, aside from me, thought to quote it and say, "bro, tf is wrong with you?"

So it's different when YOU say it, got it.

You literally posted something of exactly one person doing something, and whereas before you wholeheartedly agreed that you shouldn't lump other people together with one asshole, now all of a sudden when it fits your narrative it's, oh they all do it.

And I KNEW you were going to say that. You walked right into it.

[Seattle or Bust]

Agree. One person saying something ridiculous and racist shouldn't taint all conservatives.

That said, I agree with Seattle or Bust that the "conservative" position was against civil rights for Blacks (and yes I know that many people who had that conservative position were southern Democrats) and that the conservative position was against women being able to vote.

So it's not a good look for conservatives when someone who is a popular (at least I think he is popular) "journalist" posts something like this.

I think the dynamic is similar on "both sides".
Step 1: The moderates are often hesitant to push back against the extreme voices on "their side."
Step 2: From the "other side", these extreme voices appear to be a greater percentage of people than they actually are.
Step 3: "The other side" gets demonized because of the extreme voices.

It's not healthy.

I would caution against false equivalence.

Not having an aneurism because less than 40 trans women across the country are competing in female sports is not the same as vilifying a group of marginalized people and making up shit about them to scare people into hating them because they're "icky."

One side has to constantly protect marginalized people from the hate of the other side.

Point taken.

But I'm waiting for someone to respond, "who is protecting white males who are straight?" Seriously.

I almost added that to a previous post.

I agree that white, straight males need to be protected... just like anyone else. I have argued for getting rid of H1B visas and bringing back manufacturing jobs to the US. I get that white people in poor places are struggling.

I don't have to vilify Mexicans or Indian people to do so.

[Seattle or Bust]

Okay, isn't this what we were talking about earlier, taking something that one individual person does and tying millions of other people to that person?

It's not one individual person.

A large bulk of Trump supporters who voted for Trump did so because of white supremacy. They like that he says shit with deeply racist undertones. I'm not sure how that can be disputed and conservatives who do not believe in that shit never denounce the diseased part of the party.

I just wish conservativism was so tied to and driven by hate of marginalized people. My entire life there's been big groups of people who hate gays, Muslims, Mexicans, Jews... what have you...

I mean jfc this forum has a couple members who hate jews with all of their being. One member just pointed to "satanism" and nobody, aside from me, thought to quote it and say, "bro, tf is wrong with you?"

So it's different when YOU say it, got it.

You literally posted something of exactly one person doing something, and whereas before you wholeheartedly agreed that you shouldn't lump other people together with one asshole, now all of a sudden when it fits your narrative it's, oh they all do it.

And I KNEW you were going to say that. You walked right into it.

Walked right into what?

You just said it was one person and to not lump others.

This thread is about trans people right?

Walla Walla and Aurora have been referring to me as he/she/it... referring to me as an LPGA Tour Player as a slur... for the last 2 months after I stood up for trans people.

DanielVogelbach linked liberalism/transgenderism to mental illness and satanism.

I'm glad that you want things to be different. But don't pretend that the rest of your forum mates want the same... their actions don't line up.

[DavidGee24]

Walked right into what?

You just said it was one person and to not lump others.

This thread is about trans people right?

Walla Walla and Aurora have been referring to me as he/she/it... referring to me as an LPGA Tour Player as a slur... for the last 2 months after I stood up for trans people.

DanielVogelbach linked liberalism/transgenderism to mental illness and satanism.

I'm glad that you want things to be different. But don't pretend that the rest of your forum mates want the same... their actions don't line up.

BUT BUT BUT...bro, nobody's falling for your bullshit.