Most epic "idiot white female liberal' in WA fail of all time

[Michael K.]

Oh, like the morons in teslas with the 'anti-elon tesla club' bumper stickers. These people are beyond ridiculously stupid. How are these people not embarrassed? Oh, right, heavy medication and daily doses of CNN.

LOL, it's what I think when I see someone wearing Husky gear with a Swoosh on it! The HS I coach at just switched over to all Nike. I let my AD know that he might be able to force the kids to wear Nike Uniforms, but I'll be wearing the same Under Armor or Adidas I've been wearing my entire career!

[douche]

They learned early on that when losing the argument, try to shame the other person with name calling. This tactic is as obvious as the sun in Arizona to everyone one - but themselves.

The name calling is strictly reserved for those with no ammunition. And self awareness is a rare quality.

Also, they have NO sense of humor. God forbid a moment of time is taken away from seething hatred and outrage to laugh at a joke. Nope, too busy being offended. "lead with love' bumpersticker while literally leading with hate. Oh, like the morons in teslas with the 'anti-elon tesla club' bumper stickers. These people are beyond ridiculously stupid. How are these people not embarrassed? Oh, right, heavy medication and daily doses of CNN.

I've always believed that a certain level of intellect is required to possess a sense of humor.

The hypocrisy can be astounding.

[gil]

I'm curious (this is addressed to all of you who have posted on this thread): How large a population do you think "they" are. The occasional irrelevant, random idiot being incredibly stupid? Or by "they" do you mean everyone who votes for democrats? Somewhere in between? Is it less than one percent of the population? 10% 50%

[douche]

Valid question.

I always revert to George Carlin's take:

"Think of how stupid the average person is, and realize half of them are stupider than that."

Sadly, there's a lot of stupid in the world. And I could be wrong, but I believe a lot of that stems from laziness.

[Sibelius Hindemith]

So many angry, psychologically disturbed women out there these days. What created this? The vast majority of them are college "educated" which says a lot about what "higher" education has become in this country. Really disturbing.

[auroraave]

I'm curious (this is addressed to all of you who have posted on this thread): How large a population do you think "they" are. The occasional irrelevant, random idiot being incredibly stupid? Or by "they" do you mean everyone who votes for democrats? Somewhere in between? Is it less than one percent of the population? 10% 50%

It's a great question Gil. First, you have to acknowledge this is a far left left behavior. That is a branch of the Dems. There is a thread on here from years back about abortion - something that people hold hard stances on. It really showed the difference between right and left. I positied why abortion needed to be legal and available - and even the hard core anti-abortionists - all of them - agreed my position was the correct one when I explained why. They could disagree on something but acknowledge another truth as well - and most are open to the discussion.


The left will not have ANY conversations. None. It;s what they say, no matter how preposterous. It really boils down to calling people Nazi's if you disagree with them and try to explain a position. Literally. That's total extremism, among other things. The reason leftists behave this way is because thier positions aren' reasonable or logical and are easuly shot down with logic and reason so they have to shut down ANY covo that shows this. It's basically throwing a tantrum if they don't get thier way.

I've always beleived political spectrum is like a football field - each enzone representing the most extreme versions. Both endzone are the least populated area. Few people live in the extremes. My guess is the percentage of the population that woman falls into would be 5-10% of the Dems. Not many are like that - HOWEVER - the biggest problem is the Dems will 'go along' with this because she is 'part of thier tribe' while not necessarily alligning. Therein lies a huge problem - hanging your hat on a party and then accepting anything and everything from them.

Noew look on this forum as a clasic example - most Trunmp voters are likely to be republican (I am not) and are openly critical of him - oarty alliance making no difference - republicans/conservatives/moderates are more attuned to policy - not party alliance.

No, she does not represent a majority - but these are the people making the headlines - all the rioting, protesting, hatred and insanity is coming from the left. They approve of this behavior. I know too many Dems who secretly reject this - but keep quiet - while repubublicans and conservatives more openly criticize thier own party.

[Sibelius Hindemith]

I wouldn't be so sure that she doesn't represent a majority. Polls from 2024 showed that nearly a third of Democrat voters felt the assassination of Trump would be a good thing. Other polls have shown a growing acceptance and encouragement of political violence on the left...

A study focusing on metrics around political violence found that roughly half of respondents identifying as left-of-center expressed that assassinating or murdering major political figures like President Trump could be viewed as "at least somewhat justified".

https://networkcontagion.us/wp-content/ ... ulture.pdf

According to a national poll conducted by CloudResearch shortly after the assassination, 20% of Democratic voters believed that the killing of Charlie Kirk was justified. Among younger Democratic voters under the age of 30, that number rose to 32%.

https://www.cloudresearch.com/resources ... ng-murder/

[auroraave]

you can google "polls" to find one that concludes whatever you want it too. I reject that she represents a majority. She represents a majority of the whackadoodles, but not Dems. They are not inherently evil - there is a branch that is, but it's a small faction. The further you get from the 50 yard line the less dense it gets - the more extreme. Most people are reasonable. There are whackadoodles on the right - do you think they represent 'the majority"?

The extremes get the headlines. Always. The question is HOW did they get to this extreme thinking - because it is not innate behavior. Once you unpack the root cause you understand what is happening.

[Walla Walla Dawg II]

We also need to keep in mind that the extreme (and fake) headlines are there to sway peoples opinions.

The news making these quacks seem like the main-stream (and normal) people is not a good thing.

[DavidGee24]

Obviously this crazy broad isn't in the majority, but when you consider how emotional women in general are and you add liberalism to the mix, it's a pretty sizable number. They may not be certifiably insane, but they certainly are stupid and very outward about it because they just can't stop themselves.