I think this sounds better for people rooting for President Trump than it really is. The FEC addresses campaign finance matters, not voter fraud. So I think he is speaking outside his area of expertise, and certainly outside of anything his agency is charged with. By the way, Trump nominated him to the FEC in 2017 and he wasn't confirmed until May 2020 because Mitch McConnell apparently didn't care if the FEC had a quorum to do any of its work.BaseHitDerby wrote: ↑Wed Nov 18, 2020 10:37 pmLooks like Americans should only listen to the mainstream media that there was no voter fraud and those allegations are just conspiracy theories.FEC Chairman Debunks MSM Claims Of ‘No Fraud’, Says Counting Illegal Votes Can Make Election ‘Illegitimate’
The chairman of the Federal Elections Commission (FEC), Trey Trainor, said reports of voter fraud in key battleground states are credible.
In a recent interview, he pointed out that Democrat officials removing GOP poll watchers from polling locations is a violation of state law and federal court orders.
“When you have claims of, you know, 10,000 people who don’t live in the state of Nevada having voted in Neveda, you have the video…they’re (poll workers) either duplicating a spoiled ballot there or they’re in the process of marking a ballot that came in blank for a vote,” Trainor explained.
The FEC chief added, he agrees with the Trump campaign’s lawsuits and said their observers were denied meaningful access. Trainor also said questionable actions by the Democrats may render this election illegitimate.
“That’s a process that is to be observed by election observers, the law allows those observers to be in there,” he continued. “And if they’re not then the law is not being followed, making this an illegitimate election.”
In recent days, the mainstream media has continued to claim there was no voter fraud in this year’s elections, but Trainor’s statements reveal this election is far from over.
Who will win the presidential election
Re: Who will win the presidential election
- HawkBowler 2.0
- Posts: 2286
- Joined: Sat Aug 10, 2019 6:22 pm
Re: Who will win the presidential election
A quick synopsis from the Hoft brothers that breaks down the fraud:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=1_P3-Z2MV5I
This is easy for everyone to understand -- Drop and roll. Make a huge deposit to put Biden in the lead. Then make subsequent 'weighted' vote tallies like Biden 50.995 to Trump 49.005. Yes, they are calculated to the thousandths decimal. There shouldn't be decimals or weighted tallies used for tabulating votes.
This is clear voter fraud and the same pattern appears in each of the battle ground states. The timing for when they stopped counting is the same, and they all made large dead of the night ballot dumps when nobody was looking.
Now we know why the Democrats are trying so desperately to avoid audits and recounts.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=1_P3-Z2MV5I
This is easy for everyone to understand -- Drop and roll. Make a huge deposit to put Biden in the lead. Then make subsequent 'weighted' vote tallies like Biden 50.995 to Trump 49.005. Yes, they are calculated to the thousandths decimal. There shouldn't be decimals or weighted tallies used for tabulating votes.
This is clear voter fraud and the same pattern appears in each of the battle ground states. The timing for when they stopped counting is the same, and they all made large dead of the night ballot dumps when nobody was looking.
Now we know why the Democrats are trying so desperately to avoid audits and recounts.
Last edited by HawkBowler 2.0 on Wed Nov 18, 2020 11:15 pm, edited 1 time in total.
-
BaseHitDerby
- Posts: 877
- Joined: Wed May 01, 2019 6:51 pm
Re: Who will win the presidential election
Just because Trump nominates someone it doesn't mean that person will agree with Trump (just take a look at Esper who was just fired by him).gil wrote: ↑Wed Nov 18, 2020 10:58 pmI think this sounds better for people rooting for President Trump than it really is. The FEC addresses campaign finance matters, not voter fraud. So I think he is speaking outside his area of expertise, and certainly outside of anything his agency is charged with. By the way, Trump nominated him to the FEC in 2017 and he wasn't confirmed until May 2020 because Mitch McConnell apparently didn't care if the FEC had a quorum to do any of its work.BaseHitDerby wrote: ↑Wed Nov 18, 2020 10:37 pmLooks like Americans should only listen to the mainstream media that there was no voter fraud and those allegations are just conspiracy theories.FEC Chairman Debunks MSM Claims Of ‘No Fraud’, Says Counting Illegal Votes Can Make Election ‘Illegitimate’
The chairman of the Federal Elections Commission (FEC), Trey Trainor, said reports of voter fraud in key battleground states are credible.
In a recent interview, he pointed out that Democrat officials removing GOP poll watchers from polling locations is a violation of state law and federal court orders.
“When you have claims of, you know, 10,000 people who don’t live in the state of Nevada having voted in Neveda, you have the video…they’re (poll workers) either duplicating a spoiled ballot there or they’re in the process of marking a ballot that came in blank for a vote,” Trainor explained.
The FEC chief added, he agrees with the Trump campaign’s lawsuits and said their observers were denied meaningful access. Trainor also said questionable actions by the Democrats may render this election illegitimate.
“That’s a process that is to be observed by election observers, the law allows those observers to be in there,” he continued. “And if they’re not then the law is not being followed, making this an illegitimate election.”
In recent days, the mainstream media has continued to claim there was no voter fraud in this year’s elections, but Trainor’s statements reveal this election is far from over.
-
BaseHitDerby
- Posts: 877
- Joined: Wed May 01, 2019 6:51 pm
Re: Who will win the presidential election
Biden could've got every single electoral vote if he wanted.HawkBowler 2.0 wrote: ↑Wed Nov 18, 2020 11:13 pmA quick synopsis from the Hoft brothers that breaks down the fraud:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=1_P3-Z2MV5I
This is easy for everyone to understand -- Drop and roll. Make a huge deposit to put Biden in the lead. Then make subsequent 'weighted' vote tallies like Biden 50.995 to Trump 49.005. Yes, they are calculated to the thousandths decimal. There shouldn't be decimals or weighted tallies used for tabulating votes.
This is clear voter fraud and the same pattern appears in each of the battle ground states. The timing for when they stopped counting is the same, and they all made large dead of the night ballot dumps when nobody was looking.
Now we know why the Democrats are trying so desperately to avoid audits and recounts.
- seattlefan-daBronx
- Posts: 15833
- Joined: Wed May 01, 2019 9:37 pm
Re: Who will win the presidential election
https://conservativetoday.org/report-ge ... nt-totals/
Nothing to see here....keep drinking your hot cocoa.
Nothing to see here....keep drinking your hot cocoa.
Pronouns: Kiss/My/Ass
- HawkBowler 2.0
- Posts: 2286
- Joined: Sat Aug 10, 2019 6:22 pm
Re: Who will win the presidential election
True, this Dominion capability was the Dems ace in the hole, but I think they had to use it more than they wanted to. They didn't expect the huge Trump leads in the rust belt. That's probably going to be their undoing. It's one thing to switch a few thousand here or there, but overcoming a 700,000 Trump lead in PA? They had to kick the fraud machine into overdrive.BaseHitDerby wrote: ↑Wed Nov 18, 2020 11:23 pm
Biden could've got every single electoral vote if he wanted.
- HawkBowler 2.0
- Posts: 2286
- Joined: Sat Aug 10, 2019 6:22 pm
Re: Who will win the presidential election
This one is weird... why do a recount if they're just going to certify the original count?seattlefan-daBronx wrote: ↑Wed Nov 18, 2020 11:23 pmhttps://conservativetoday.org/report-ge ... nt-totals/
Nothing to see here....keep drinking your hot cocoa.
-
BaseHitDerby
- Posts: 877
- Joined: Wed May 01, 2019 6:51 pm
Re: Who will win the presidential election
To make the public think the original count was legit.HawkBowler 2.0 wrote: ↑Wed Nov 18, 2020 11:30 pmThis one is weird... why do a recount if they're just going to certify the original count?seattlefan-daBronx wrote: ↑Wed Nov 18, 2020 11:23 pmhttps://conservativetoday.org/report-ge ... nt-totals/
Nothing to see here....keep drinking your hot cocoa.
- seattlefan-daBronx
- Posts: 15833
- Joined: Wed May 01, 2019 9:37 pm
Re: Who will win the presidential election
I believe once there is a "recount" or the count is certified by the state it's pretty hard to say "human error" continues to be the problem.HawkBowler 2.0 wrote: ↑Wed Nov 18, 2020 11:30 pmThis one is weird... why do a recount if they're just going to certify the original count?seattlefan-daBronx wrote: ↑Wed Nov 18, 2020 11:23 pmhttps://conservativetoday.org/report-ge ... nt-totals/
Nothing to see here....keep drinking your hot cocoa.
Galvanizes the parties involved to the crimes committed also.
Now it becomes "admissible evidence" for the court.
That's why Sidney Powell said the states would be "stupid to certify these results". "I'm going after all of them." Damn I like that lady!
Who wants to bet Stacy Abrahams is implicated when the SHTF?
Pronouns: Kiss/My/Ass
- seattlefan-daBronx
- Posts: 15833
- Joined: Wed May 01, 2019 9:37 pm
Re: Who will win the presidential election
Yepperie! They overshot in the algorithm for the number of harvested ballots. Stupid. I want them to certify. Cant go back and change it after that.HawkBowler 2.0 wrote: ↑Wed Nov 18, 2020 11:29 pmTrue, this Dominion capability was the Dems ace in the hole, but I think they had to use it more than they wanted to. They didn't expect the huge Trump leads in the rust belt. That's probably going to be their undoing. It's one thing to switch a few thousand here or there, but overcoming a 700,000 Trump lead in PA? They had to kick the fraud machine into overdrive.BaseHitDerby wrote: ↑Wed Nov 18, 2020 11:23 pm
Biden could've got every single electoral vote if he wanted.
Pronouns: Kiss/My/Ass