gil wrote: ↑Mon Nov 23, 2020 8:21 pm
Sidney Powell's explanation is pretty far out there, but I'm willing to give it a fair hearing. (I've always been lured in by a good "they never tell you what is really happening because they are all in this together and they are working against your interests" theory.) But so far, the Dominion story seems to me that people are repeating what other people are saying. WHERE and WHAT is the evidence? Please don't tell me to look it up. I'd like to see it posted here. I know that Powell says she has it. I know that Lin Wood says he has seen it.
First, it should be noted that Powell only needs a preponderance of the evidence in order for her coming lawsuit(s) to move forward. Nobody asks for proof before the lawsuit is filed or the trial begins. Sidney is pursuing criminal charges (another key point).. meaning there will be defendants, the opening of discovery to receive further evidence, and cross examination.
You asked for Where and What... nobody explains that better than Dr. Shiva (inventor of email)
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=9XdKmeaFwIU
Powell is a career professional who's unlikely to want to destroy her reputation and career by claiming evidence that she doesn't have. There was some of that already from the presser. Affidavits from eyewitness. Powell mentions that they have several Dominion whistle blowers. Again, evidence from eye witnesses.
Let's check in on this in about 10 days, okay, but I suspect that there is nothing here. *IF* this were true, it would be the political crime of the century, wouldn't it? Don't you think that investigative reporters like David Fahrenthold of the Washington Post or Mark McIntire or the NY Times would LOVE to break a story like this?
LOL. No way in hell! Would that be the same way they reported Hunter's polluted lap top?
And please don't say that all the investigative reporters in the world (except for those who are at Newsmax and OANN and Breitbart) are part of the Deep State and have been bought off. That is too convenient and defies logic.
I disagree with your logic. If you work for CNN and you want to do a story on how Trump did a great job on the economy, do you really have that choice? No, the platform decides which stories will run and which to ignore. ABC/NBC/AP/Washington Post/Fox... all of them. The publishers control the stories and the ongoing narratives. 95% of them are now controlled by only six companies.
Let me ask this: what (if anything) would convince you that what Sidney Powell is peddling is, by and large, simply not true?
Why should we make that choice right now? She's expected to file charges by the end of the week. And to be sure, she'll be packing the lawsuit(s) with plenty of evidence. More than she would at the preliminary stage just to get the word out that the media wont report.
Question for you: If people who work for Dominion are coming forward to talk about how the company engages in voter fraud, why wouldn't you listen to them? Better yet, why isn't the media tracking down some of the 200 affidavits filed by the Trump legal team? Why are they censoring? Better yet, what are they afraid of exposing?
