https://100percentfedup.com/video-sidne ... -election/
Who will win the presidential election
- seattlefan-daBronx
- Posts: 15798
- Joined: Wed May 01, 2019 9:37 pm
Re: Who will win the presidential election
Good interview. I like Sidney. She'll make a good Judge for the tribunals!
https://100percentfedup.com/video-sidne ... -election/
https://100percentfedup.com/video-sidne ... -election/
Pronouns: Kiss/My/Ass
- HawkBowler 2.0
- Posts: 2286
- Joined: Sat Aug 10, 2019 6:22 pm
Re: Who will win the presidential election
Ha, that's a wide margin.seattlefan-daBronx wrote: ↑Tue Dec 15, 2020 12:14 am
The real question is...will Donald John Trump pull that trigger?
I believe he will go down in history as either the 3rd greatest President to ever live or a total fucking marshmallow that sold us into Chinese slavery.
Trump is the only power keeping us from that slow acquiesce into Chinese slavery.
Third greatest POTUS ever is way up there. If Trump can some how over turn this fraudulent election, he will be #1, right? That's some George Washington voodoo.
- seattlefan-daBronx
- Posts: 15798
- Joined: Wed May 01, 2019 9:37 pm
Re: Who will win the presidential election
I don't know Hawk...Washington and Jackson were down there on the bloody battlefield. What Trump has to face right now is different kind of war it's cyber / intelligence.HawkBowler 2.0 wrote: ↑Tue Dec 15, 2020 3:30 amHa, that's a wide margin.seattlefan-daBronx wrote: ↑Tue Dec 15, 2020 12:14 am
The real question is...will Donald John Trump pull that trigger?
I believe he will go down in history as either the 3rd greatest President to ever live or a total fucking marshmallow that sold us into Chinese slavery.
Trump is the only power keeping us from that slow acquiesce into Chinese slavery.
Third greatest POTUS ever is way up there. If Trump can some how over turn this fraudulent election, he will be #1, right? That's some George Washington voodoo.
Still takes courage though to send that order of men. He freakin does what we pray he will do and he'll be hero no doubt. Andrew Jackson declared "Martial Law" in New Orleans too. His rag-tag army of 4500 vs. 8000 British regulars. Once the British Colonel was shot, his soldiers ran into our fire.
2000 British casualties vs. 100 American countrymen. President James Monroe praised General Jackson by saying, “History records no example of so glorious a victory obtained with so little bloodshed on the part of the victorious.”
Who does Trump idolize out of all of the Presidents? He always says Abe Lincoln was Republican but he is most compared to Andrew Jackson.
Pronouns: Kiss/My/Ass
- HawkBowler 2.0
- Posts: 2286
- Joined: Sat Aug 10, 2019 6:22 pm
Re: Who will win the presidential election
Truman is a good comparison to Trump. Both were outsiders who took on the establishment. How many presidents have the opportunity to save the country from a socialist takeover?
It would be incredibly weak if Trump won a landslide victory (which he did) only to have it stolen with obvious wide spread voter fraud. Trump took an oath to protect the constitution which necessitates that he overturn this election. Trump should not concede under any circumstances.
It would be incredibly weak if Trump won a landslide victory (which he did) only to have it stolen with obvious wide spread voter fraud. Trump took an oath to protect the constitution which necessitates that he overturn this election. Trump should not concede under any circumstances.
- HawkBowler 2.0
- Posts: 2286
- Joined: Sat Aug 10, 2019 6:22 pm
Re: Who will win the presidential election
Biden might be right about the battle for the soul of America part, but the rest is pure projected lies.“In this battle for the soul of America, democracy prevailed,” Biden said. “We the people voted. Faith in our institutions held. The integrity of our elections remains intact. And so now it is time to turn the page. To unite. To heal.”
https://www.vox.com/2020/12/14/22175364 ... eech-trump
Everyone knows that the election was stolen... only around half of the country is willing to admit it.
"Faith in our institutions held"
Translation: The DOJ and FBI fulfilled their promise not to investigate our "most extensive voter fraud operation in American history."
"We the people voted"
Translation: And we the woke mob added votes that didn't come from actual people.
But forget all that... let's turn the page. Come in here for a hug. Let's all heal together.
- HawkBowler 2.0
- Posts: 2286
- Joined: Sat Aug 10, 2019 6:22 pm
Re: Who will win the presidential election
Scavino wrote that tweet last night and then deleted it this morning.Dan Scavino wrote:Historical moment in the Oval--will share what it was, one of these days, when I can...
What could it be... insurrection act?
I actually have a connection to Danny. My ex wife is one of his first cousins. I met him at a wedding on long Island back in 2003. At the time, The Apprentice was a hit show, so I asked him if Trump was really like he is on tv. He said yes, pretty much the same guy. Key difference, though, was that he didn't like to fire people. He's a loyalist. The "you're fired' schtick was just part of the show. That fits with what we've seen out of Trump in his first term... if anything, he trusted too much and didn't fire enough people.
- seattlefan-daBronx
- Posts: 15798
- Joined: Wed May 01, 2019 9:37 pm
Re: Who will win the presidential election
Per Mike Adams last post his sources confirmed that he may have signed the order already.HawkBowler 2.0 wrote: ↑Wed Dec 16, 2020 4:43 pmScavino wrote that tweet last night and then deleted it this morning.Dan Scavino wrote:Historical moment in the Oval--will share what it was, one of these days, when I can...
What could it be... insurrection act?
I actually have a connection to Danny. My ex wife is one of his first cousins. I met him at a wedding on long Island back in 2003. At the time, The Apprentice was a hit show, so I asked him if Trump was really like he is on tv. He said yes, pretty much the same guy. Key difference, though, was that he didn't like to fire people. He's a loyalist. The "you're fired' schtick was just part of the show. That fits with what we've seen out of Trump in his first term... if anything, he trusted too much and didn't fire enough people.
Friday's DNI report will be imho the cat out of the bag.
Funny how these "Republicans" revert back to their true selves once they believe the contest is over.
Mitch "the turtle" McConnell congratulates his swamp creature counterpart.
Rand Paul "considered the fringe, right wing cooke of the body, now admits fraud in the election.
https://www.washingtonexaminer.com/news ... ion-stolen
Pronouns: Kiss/My/Ass
- HawkBowler 2.0
- Posts: 2286
- Joined: Sat Aug 10, 2019 6:22 pm
Re: Who will win the presidential election
It was nice for Rand Paul to just come out and say it -- the election was stolen. The other side can say that there's no evidence... without providing evidence. It's not worth getting lost in the minutiae of detail. The election was stolen. Period.
Maria Bartiromo says that her intel source confirms that Trump won the election and it's up to SCOTUS to stop the electoral process.
https://twitter.com/RexChapman/status/1 ... k-video%2F
Maria Bartiromo says that her intel source confirms that Trump won the election and it's up to SCOTUS to stop the electoral process.
https://twitter.com/RexChapman/status/1 ... k-video%2F
Re: Who will win the presidential election
So here we are 3 weeks later. The courts in several states have heard evidence. But the courts have mostly ruled again Trump, both on procedural grounds and because there was no real evidence of election fraud, tampering, etc. Is there something that, even after the electoral college has voted, has not been presented to the courts? And if so, why not? I suspect that republican election officials in Georgia, or majority republican legislators in GA, PA, WI would have been willing to act on any solid evidence. I suspect that Mitch McConnell would not be congratulating Biden if there were any solid evidence.HawkBowler 2.0 wrote: ↑Thu Nov 26, 2020 5:20 pmJenna Ellis had a great moment at the first presser when she told the activist reporters that "their opinion doesn't matter."gil wrote: ↑Thu Nov 26, 2020 5:03 pm"IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICCT COURT, NORTHERN DISTRCOICT OF GEORGIA, ATLANTA DIVISION"
I'm sorry folks, typos like this give me a bad impression. I hope for Sidney Powell's professional reputation, the substance of her filing is better than her spelling/proofing. Starting to read now ...
https://defendingtherepublic.org/wp-con ... 5.2020.pdf
Or maybe she is just being sarcastic.![]()
Or maybe this is just a conspiracy to get a different name for our NHL team.![]()
The same is true for you. It doesn't matter if you believe the validity of the lawsuits put forth by L. Wood and Sydney Powell. It matters what the judges think, what the jury of peers think.
Powell's lawsuits offer more than enough "preponderance of evidence" to move forward. The evidence she has is already substantial. We know that this evidence trove will grow as well once discovery is granted.
There's more than enough evidence of fraud in MI, PA and GA to stop Biden from receiving those electoral votes. That would put him under the required 270 and the battle would move to Congress and then SCOTUS.
Barry Obama's biggest mistake as president was leaving hundreds of federal court seats for his chosen successor Hillary. Trump filled them all and now the Republicans dominate SCOTUS and the circuit courts. L. Wood has already moved his GA lawsuit into the Trump friendly 11th Circuit court.
- HawkBowler 2.0
- Posts: 2286
- Joined: Sat Aug 10, 2019 6:22 pm
Re: Who will win the presidential election
The bolded parts are simply not true. The Biden lawfare group along with compliant judges have blocked the hearing of evidence. The latest case with SCOTUS is a prime example. The Texas lawsuit was denied due to standing not merit.gil wrote: ↑Wed Dec 16, 2020 11:55 pm
So here we are 3 weeks later. The courts in several states have heard evidence. But the courts have mostly ruled again Trump, both on procedural grounds and because there was no real evidence of election fraud, tampering, etc. Is there something that, even after the electoral college has voted, has not been presented to the courts? And if so, why not? I suspect that republican election officials in Georgia, or majority republican legislators in GA, PA, WI would have been willing to act on any solid evidence. I suspect that Mitch McConnell would not be congratulating Biden if there were any solid evidence.
The media wants us to believe that there's been a Perry Mason case on the matter, the evidence was presented in court, the jury deliberated and nothing to be seen. The reality is that the courts have blocked the hearings... so the evidence can't be heard. That way people on the blue team can continue to ask for the evidence.
Why hasn't Mitch McConnell done anything? Great question. Another would involve McConnell's wife who has a long and profitable relationship with China.