Why is this necessary?Best thing to do is be prepared for "lockdown" and it will not be like a COVID lockdown, it'll be everyone confined to our
homes for our safety, origin being D.C. and "Global" in scope.
Who will win the presidential election
- HawkBowler 2.0
- Posts: 2286
- Joined: Sat Aug 10, 2019 6:22 pm
Re: Who will win the presidential election
Re: Who will win the presidential election
The results of the Antrim County hand recount.
This month should be

This month should be
- seattlefan-daBronx
- Posts: 15730
- Joined: Wed May 01, 2019 9:37 pm
Re: Who will win the presidential election
Under "Martial Law" you can't just decide you're going to the store.HawkBowler 2.0 wrote: ↑Mon Dec 21, 2020 1:53 amWhy is this necessary?Best thing to do is be prepared for "lockdown" and it will not be like a COVID lockdown, it'll be everyone confined to our
homes for our safety, origin being D.C. and "Global" in scope.
They're saying mission accomplished within two weeks.
Pronouns: Kiss/My/Ass
Re: Who will win the presidential election
Martial law has never been on the table as far as I know. Insurrection Act on the other hand...
- HawkBowler 2.0
- Posts: 2286
- Joined: Sat Aug 10, 2019 6:22 pm
Re: Who will win the presidential election
The Overstock guy, Patrick Byrne was at that White House meeting on Friday.
It is 100% winnable. No martial law required. Sydney and Flynn presented a course that I estimate has 50% – 75% chance of victory. His staff just try to convince him to do nothing but accept it. As a CEO, my heart broke to see what he is going through. He is betrayed from within.
- HawkBowler 2.0
- Posts: 2286
- Joined: Sat Aug 10, 2019 6:22 pm
Re: Who will win the presidential election
Well, all we need is a DOJ that's not afraid to investigate and prosecute the people who stole the election.seattlefan-daBronx wrote: ↑Mon Dec 21, 2020 4:12 am
Under "Martial Law" you can't just decide you're going to the store.
They're saying mission accomplished within two weeks.
I don't see the need for martial law. The bad guys are out in the open. We know who they are. They have official titles. Take those people down first, squeeze them into submission, and then take down the 'big guys.'
The only way we would go into a nationwide martial law lockdown is if we were under threat of foreign invasion. That's a scary possibility given what China, Iran and Russia did during the election, but I don't think we're at a WWIII level yet.
- Coeurd’Alene J
- Posts: 5717
- Joined: Wed May 01, 2019 2:56 am
Re: Who will win the presidential election
It warms my heart to know that our very own Department of Justice never stopped in their quest to prosecute in the Lockerbie plane tragedy....
So let me put this into perspective.....Some where around 2052 we should finally get to the bottom of the election fraud we all witnessed in the 2020 election...
What a country.......
So let me put this into perspective.....Some where around 2052 we should finally get to the bottom of the election fraud we all witnessed in the 2020 election...
What a country.......
- HawkBowler 2.0
- Posts: 2286
- Joined: Sat Aug 10, 2019 6:22 pm
Re: Who will win the presidential election
The FBI will investigate a fake noose at NASCAR
They will investigate MAGA trucks following Kamala's tour bus
They will run a sting operation to take down internet tough guys talking trash about Gov Witmer
But will they investigate the obvious tidal wave of voter fraud in 2020? Meh.. nothing to see here.
They will investigate MAGA trucks following Kamala's tour bus
They will run a sting operation to take down internet tough guys talking trash about Gov Witmer
But will they investigate the obvious tidal wave of voter fraud in 2020? Meh.. nothing to see here.
- HawkBowler 2.0
- Posts: 2286
- Joined: Sat Aug 10, 2019 6:22 pm
Re: Who will win the presidential election
I keep asking myself... what more evidence do we need to see concerning fraud? What would take it to the next level?
The mail-in ballots served the purpose of reaching enough total votes. The majority of the fraud was carried out at the machine or software level, making the votes on the actual ballots irrelevant.
Dominion machines were calibrated to return high error rates in order to force large numbers of votes into adjudication. Those files were then manipulated remotely.
So.. the next level fraud discovery would be the fraud command center. Picture Obama in a white van somewhere. But seriously, there had to be some sort of command structure in place telling everyone when to stop counting, how many votes to add at 4 am, ect.
People like Ruby and her daughter in Georgia are connected to fraud command central. Phone records. Emails. It doesn't take Columbo to work our way back to the real people in charge.
The mail-in ballots served the purpose of reaching enough total votes. The majority of the fraud was carried out at the machine or software level, making the votes on the actual ballots irrelevant.
Dominion machines were calibrated to return high error rates in order to force large numbers of votes into adjudication. Those files were then manipulated remotely.
So.. the next level fraud discovery would be the fraud command center. Picture Obama in a white van somewhere. But seriously, there had to be some sort of command structure in place telling everyone when to stop counting, how many votes to add at 4 am, ect.
People like Ruby and her daughter in Georgia are connected to fraud command central. Phone records. Emails. It doesn't take Columbo to work our way back to the real people in charge.
Re: Who will win the presidential election
What makes you think that they are NOT investigating. I think AG Barr has been pretty clear that they have been and are investigating. But they just haven't found anything that is significant enough to change the election results.HawkBowler 2.0 wrote: ↑Mon Dec 21, 2020 4:30 pmThe FBI will investigate a fake noose at NASCAR
They will investigate MAGA trucks following Kamala's tour bus
They will run a sting operation to take down internet tough guys talking trash about Gov Witmer
But will they investigate the obvious tidal wave of voter fraud in 2020? Meh.. nothing to see here.
https://www.foxnews.com/politics/barr-n ... nter-biden
Meanwhile, Barr on Monday said he is "sure" there was voter fraud in the 2020 presidential race but stopped short of calling for a special counsel investigation.
The attorney general said he sees "no basis" for the federal government to seize voting machines and examine them for possible fraud.
"Off the top of my head, I'm not going to opine on a constitutional issue as far as the power goes," Barr said Monday.
He added, though, that "there are fraud and unfortunately in most elections I think we're too tolerant of it."
"I'm sure there was fraud in this election, but I was commenting on the extent to which we had looked at suggestions or allegations of systemic or brace fraud that could affect the outcome of the election, and I already spoke to that, and I stand by that statement," he said.
Earlier this month, Barr said the Justice Department has not uncovered evidence of widespread voter fraud that could change the outcome of the 2020 presidential election, despite claims by Trump and his campaign’s legal team.
Barr, during an interview with The Associated Press earlier this month, said U.S. attorneys and FBI officials have been working to follow up on specific complaints and information they have received but have not uncovered enough evidence that would change the outcome of the election.
"To date, we have not seen fraud on a scale that could have affected a different outcome in the election," Barr told The Associated Press.