HawkBowler 2.0 wrote: ↑Fri Jan 01, 2021 4:49 pm
Hey, unless he knows something everybody else does, its hard to disagree after the Epstein comment.
I wish he didn't say that... even if it's true.
This is like Sidney Powell bringing up Hugo Chavez. It's too much for people to digest. The fraud that's already out in the open is enough. The other side is looking for a reason to discount all the speculation about the election. They want to Pizza Gate this...
I agree that some of the things that Wood and Powell have put forth can be used (by people who feel Biden won fairly) to taint honest concerns about the election. It reminds me a bit of whatever democrat it was (I think it was someone newly elected in 2016) who proclaimed "impeach the M_____F__er" before Trump had even taken office. That was ridiculous and completely unreasonable, in my opinion, and I think, to use your words, it gave "the other side a reason to discount" further investigations into Trump, including what the special cancel Mueller looked into and the impeachment itself.
I'd like to see a full, conclusive investigation into "the fraud". I'd be happy if Biden announced a commission to look at the charges. If there is fraud at even a fraction of what has been alleged, it should be brought into the open for all Americans to know about. And yes, I have been reading the reports and examining many of the legal challenges.
Related: I just read that Pence is asking for the dismissal the Gohmert lawsuit. Basically saying that it is up to the House and Senate to address the concerns about electors; i.e., it is not Pence's role under the Constitution of Federal laws.