DanielVogelbach wrote: ↑Mon Oct 13, 2025 5:59 pm
XpertDBA wrote: ↑Mon Oct 13, 2025 5:48 pm
Seems like you're completely free already to me. You get to spout your word diarrhea here every single day, without facing any consequences at all. How much more freedom do you need? What freedoms do you believe you don't have here in the U.S. that you wish you had? (Please respond in a normal, controlled, short, non-verbose way.....I know that's a lot to ask, but give it a try)
This is like asking a slave on a plantation what freedoms they don't have.
How about we start with fiat currency, taxation, and legal tender laws?
How about gun control, border control, and K-12 indoctrination camps for children?
I can go on, but you want concise.
With the first three, those are interesting points — but all three of those things are trade-offs that come with having a functioning, stable society. Fiat currency enables economic flexibility; taxation funds the infrastructure, courts, and defense that make freedom possible; and legal tender laws ensure a consistent medium of exchange so people can actually trade efficiently. You might not like those systems, but they’re not proof we aren’t free — they’re the price of living in a complex, organized country instead of a barter economy.
For the others, those are policy choices, not proof we aren’t free. Democracies trade some individual autonomy for public order and services: gun rules are contested Second Amendment and public-safety tradeoffs, border rules reflect sovereign states deciding who may enter, and disputes over K–12 content are political fights about curriculum — not literal “indoctrination camps.” If you want change, the solution is political (vote, lobby, run for office), not anger. I doubt you'd ever run for office though, as you'd rather bitch and complain on a sports forum then actually affect any kind of positive change.