Not to mention hundreds of witnesses saw American Flight 77 hit the Pentagon (and it's easy to witness from the 395 and 27 Freeways) and thousands saw it going down, yet complete idiots believe it was a missile because some crackpot made it up on the Internet.XpertDBA wrote: ↑Mon Jun 30, 2025 5:47 pmBbj said "The world trade centers got hit by planes, yeah. Would that bring them straight down at free fall speed? Not a chance. Especially not one of the buildings that was never even hit."
Prove it. Scientifically recreate the scenario by which a large commercial vehicle hits a skyscaper in the middle with completely full fuel tanks and let it burn in the middle for 2 hours and then tell me what happens.
Make sure to keep the structure of the buildings exactly as they were that day.
We saw with our own eyes what happens. The top pancakes onto the bottom floors and the weight pushes it straight down in a domino effect, just like the laws of physics says it will.
Tell me what crazy conspiracy theory says it wont.
The burden of proof is up to you, because my eyes witnessed exactly that.
JFK assassination revisited
-
- Posts: 9084
- Joined: Wed May 01, 2019 6:24 pm
- Location: Phillips Ranch, CA
Re: JFK assassination revisited
Re: JFK assassination revisited
Should be easy enough to find videos of the plane hitting the Pentagon then shouldn't it?DavidGee24 wrote: ↑Mon Jun 30, 2025 5:59 pmNot to mention hundreds of witnesses saw American Flight 77 hit the Pentagon (and it's easy to witness from the 395 and 27 Freeways) and thousands saw it going down, yet complete idiots believe it was a missile because some crackpot made it up on the Internet.XpertDBA wrote: ↑Mon Jun 30, 2025 5:47 pmBbj said "The world trade centers got hit by planes, yeah. Would that bring them straight down at free fall speed? Not a chance. Especially not one of the buildings that was never even hit."
Prove it. Scientifically recreate the scenario by which a large commercial vehicle hits a skyscaper in the middle with completely full fuel tanks and let it burn in the middle for 2 hours and then tell me what happens.
Make sure to keep the structure of the buildings exactly as they were that day.
We saw with our own eyes what happens. The top pancakes onto the bottom floors and the weight pushes it straight down in a domino effect, just like the laws of physics says it will.
Tell me what crazy conspiracy theory says it wont.
The burden of proof is up to you, because my eyes witnessed exactly that.
Instead they've mostly been suppressed. And the couple videos that have made it out don't show a plane hitting.
https://youtu.be/8Vnu_yiUzls?si=ndtG9zUeC3ALUKta
There were 40 minutes from the time the Pentagon got hit and the roof collapsed. Can you find a picture on the Internet of the impact hole anymore? Or only after the roof collapsed? Why would that get scrubbed from the internet? Because do you remember the hole? I do.
I don't expect you people to believe what I do. You've been told what to believe enough times you've clearly bought the plot.
-
- Posts: 9084
- Joined: Wed May 01, 2019 6:24 pm
- Location: Phillips Ranch, CA
Re: JFK assassination revisited
You might want to scroll down slightly to where the guy who posted that video added this disclaimer:bpj wrote: ↑Tue Jul 01, 2025 9:09 amShould be easy enough to find videos of the plane hitting the Pentagon then shouldn't it?DavidGee24 wrote: ↑Mon Jun 30, 2025 5:59 pmNot to mention hundreds of witnesses saw American Flight 77 hit the Pentagon (and it's easy to witness from the 395 and 27 Freeways) and thousands saw it going down, yet complete idiots believe it was a missile because some crackpot made it up on the Internet.XpertDBA wrote: ↑Mon Jun 30, 2025 5:47 pmBbj said "The world trade centers got hit by planes, yeah. Would that bring them straight down at free fall speed? Not a chance. Especially not one of the buildings that was never even hit."
Prove it. Scientifically recreate the scenario by which a large commercial vehicle hits a skyscaper in the middle with completely full fuel tanks and let it burn in the middle for 2 hours and then tell me what happens.
Make sure to keep the structure of the buildings exactly as they were that day.
We saw with our own eyes what happens. The top pancakes onto the bottom floors and the weight pushes it straight down in a domino effect, just like the laws of physics says it will.
Tell me what crazy conspiracy theory says it wont.
The burden of proof is up to you, because my eyes witnessed exactly that.
Instead they've mostly been suppressed. And the couple videos that have made it out don't show a plane hitting.
https://youtu.be/8Vnu_yiUzls?si=ndtG9zUeC3ALUKta
"i created this video in after effects. its clearly an obvious fake. you can see the fire overlay moving around and the stock footage can be found online. i literally spend ten minutes making it as a response to the shitty 'footage' the pentagon put out. now people are posting it as proof a missile hit the pentagon even though the video is not even the correct contact point on the building.
here is another video i made about the same event that is also fake but im sure ill start seeing it on twitter as 'proofs' someday as iq's continue to drop"
What's especially hilarious is that the guy posted this with the disclaimer and several people STILL thought it was real.

Re: JFK assassination revisited
That doesn't surprise me either. And it's still the only video available. From a building that has cameras everywhere. That's the point.DavidGee24 wrote: ↑Tue Jul 01, 2025 5:33 pmYou might want to scroll down slightly to where the guy who posted that video added this disclaimer:bpj wrote: ↑Tue Jul 01, 2025 9:09 amShould be easy enough to find videos of the plane hitting the Pentagon then shouldn't it?DavidGee24 wrote: ↑Mon Jun 30, 2025 5:59 pm
Not to mention hundreds of witnesses saw American Flight 77 hit the Pentagon (and it's easy to witness from the 395 and 27 Freeways) and thousands saw it going down, yet complete idiots believe it was a missile because some crackpot made it up on the Internet.
Instead they've mostly been suppressed. And the couple videos that have made it out don't show a plane hitting.
https://youtu.be/8Vnu_yiUzls?si=ndtG9zUeC3ALUKta
"i created this video in after effects. its clearly an obvious fake. you can see the fire overlay moving around and the stock footage can be found online. i literally spend ten minutes making it as a response to the shitty 'footage' the pentagon put out. now people are posting it as proof a missile hit the pentagon even though the video is not even the correct contact point on the building.
here is another video i made about the same event that is also fake but im sure ill start seeing it on twitter as 'proofs' someday as iq's continue to drop"
What's especially hilarious is that the guy posted this with the disclaimer and several people STILL thought it was real.![]()
Find a picture of the Pentagon after the impact but before the roof collapsed. (Good luck)
https://youtu.be/WWj-dUOWNzI?si=38sVfA3P4hB79s94
-
- Posts: 9084
- Joined: Wed May 01, 2019 6:24 pm
- Location: Phillips Ranch, CA
Re: JFK assassination revisited
No, your point was that the video was evidence that a plane didn't hit the Pentagon. I mean, that's literally the exact reason you posted it as expressed in the words that you specifically posted. There's no coming back from that, and all the "but but but"s in the world aren't going to change that.bpj wrote: ↑Tue Jul 01, 2025 9:24 pmThat doesn't surprise me either. And it's still the only video available. From a building that has cameras everywhere. That's the point.DavidGee24 wrote: ↑Tue Jul 01, 2025 5:33 pmYou might want to scroll down slightly to where the guy who posted that video added this disclaimer:bpj wrote: ↑Tue Jul 01, 2025 9:09 am
Should be easy enough to find videos of the plane hitting the Pentagon then shouldn't it?
Instead they've mostly been suppressed. And the couple videos that have made it out don't show a plane hitting.
https://youtu.be/8Vnu_yiUzls?si=ndtG9zUeC3ALUKta
"i created this video in after effects. its clearly an obvious fake. you can see the fire overlay moving around and the stock footage can be found online. i literally spend ten minutes making it as a response to the shitty 'footage' the pentagon put out. now people are posting it as proof a missile hit the pentagon even though the video is not even the correct contact point on the building.
here is another video i made about the same event that is also fake but im sure ill start seeing it on twitter as 'proofs' someday as iq's continue to drop"
What's especially hilarious is that the guy posted this with the disclaimer and several people STILL thought it was real.![]()
Find a picture of the Pentagon after the impact but before the roof collapsed. (Good luck)
https://youtu.be/WWj-dUOWNzI?si=38sVfA3P4hB79s94
Re: JFK assassination revisited
Should be easy for you to provide a video of a plane hitting the Pentagon...DavidGee24 wrote: ↑Tue Jul 01, 2025 11:54 pmNo, your point was that the video was evidence that a plane didn't hit the Pentagon. I mean, that's literally the exact reason you posted it as expressed in the words that you specifically posted. There's no coming back from that, and all the "but but but"s in the world aren't going to change that.bpj wrote: ↑Tue Jul 01, 2025 9:24 pmThat doesn't surprise me either. And it's still the only video available. From a building that has cameras everywhere. That's the point.DavidGee24 wrote: ↑Tue Jul 01, 2025 5:33 pm
You might want to scroll down slightly to where the guy who posted that video added this disclaimer:
"i created this video in after effects. its clearly an obvious fake. you can see the fire overlay moving around and the stock footage can be found online. i literally spend ten minutes making it as a response to the shitty 'footage' the pentagon put out. now people are posting it as proof a missile hit the pentagon even though the video is not even the correct contact point on the building.
here is another video i made about the same event that is also fake but im sure ill start seeing it on twitter as 'proofs' someday as iq's continue to drop"
What's especially hilarious is that the guy posted this with the disclaimer and several people STILL thought it was real.![]()
Find a picture of the Pentagon after the impact but before the roof collapsed. (Good luck)
https://youtu.be/WWj-dUOWNzI?si=38sVfA3P4hB79s94
Or to find a picture of the Pentagon after it got hit before the roof fell in...
But, you can't.
-
- Posts: 9084
- Joined: Wed May 01, 2019 6:24 pm
- Location: Phillips Ranch, CA
Re: JFK assassination revisited
Nah, I'll just go with the testimony of hundreds of witnesses which are only a percentage of those who made their testimony public.
I can't believe this conversation is actually taking place.
Re: JFK assassination revisited
Yeah, exactly. You can't provide any more proof than I can.DavidGee24 wrote: ↑Wed Jul 02, 2025 5:34 amNah, I'll just go with the testimony of hundreds of witnesses which are only a percentage of those who made their testimony public.
I can't believe this conversation is actually taking place.
You just believe what you're told to believe. There are witnesses on both sides. You just believe the official narrative. Like, "safe and effective".
-
- Posts: 9084
- Joined: Wed May 01, 2019 6:24 pm
- Location: Phillips Ranch, CA
Re: JFK assassination revisited
LOL there weren't "witnesses on both sides", and you've already gotten busted for providing a fake video.bpj wrote: ↑Wed Jul 02, 2025 5:44 amYeah, exactly. You can't provide any more proof than I can.DavidGee24 wrote: ↑Wed Jul 02, 2025 5:34 amNah, I'll just go with the testimony of hundreds of witnesses which are only a percentage of those who made their testimony public.
I can't believe this conversation is actually taking place.
You just believe what you're told to believe. There are witnesses on both sides. You just believe the official narrative. Like, "safe and effective".
Why are you even still talking? Have you lost your marbles? Are we going to see you in the news sometime soon as the subject of a manhunt in the wilderness?
Re: JFK assassination revisited
Yes there were. I already posted a video where a journalist said it looked like a missile with wings.DavidGee24 wrote: ↑Wed Jul 02, 2025 5:51 amLOL there weren't "witnesses on both sides", and you've already gotten busted for providing a fake video.bpj wrote: ↑Wed Jul 02, 2025 5:44 amYeah, exactly. You can't provide any more proof than I can.DavidGee24 wrote: ↑Wed Jul 02, 2025 5:34 am
Nah, I'll just go with the testimony of hundreds of witnesses which are only a percentage of those who made their testimony public.
I can't believe this conversation is actually taking place.
You just believe what you're told to believe. There are witnesses on both sides. You just believe the official narrative. Like, "safe and effective".
Why are you even still talking? Have you lost your marbles? Are we going to see you in the news sometime soon as the subject of a manhunt in the wilderness?
Go ahead and provide a video of the Pentagon getting hit.
Provide a picture of the hole.
You can't.