It's Pride Month!

[DavidGee24]

I was a US Marine and was nothing like what you describe, nor were any of my friends in the Corps. I'm realistic about how the world is and what war is. Pawns, oil, blah blah blah. But I had my own reasons for serving, I feel that they were honorable, and no weirdo sitting in a dark, cold, empty room blathering away on his keyboard is going to tell me any different.

You do realize that if "nobody signed up for that shit", you'd be depositing your Mental Disability check at Derherferderwaffershtein National Bank or at Hyukijukibazuki Federal Credit Union. Until the rest of the world stops "signing up for that shit", Americans have to "sign up for that shit".

So you're welcome for my service.

Great post. I admire how measured you are, given that if I had served as you did, I don't think I would have been so measured. Thank you. And thank you.

Well, it's not necessary to fly into an uncontrollable rage like Seattle Or Bust does. It's easy to shut down guys like him and DV while remaining calm about it.

[douche]

And I don't think it is ever a good thing for organizations to have any sort of 'tribute' themed game, unless it's to the troops.

"Thank you for your service" and "Pride Month" are the same fucking thing... It's called brainwashing.

Free markets, free minds.

Troops ain't nothing but mindless welfare recipient attack dogs for war mongering psychopaths. We would be in a lot better shape if nobody signed up for that shit. Nobody should be praising anyone for mindlessly fighting wars on behalf of bankers and politicians, indiscriminately blowing shit up and killing innocent people all paid for with stolen funds. Order obeying cowards that can't think for themselves. Fighting wars on behalf of some of the most evil people in the world all for the perks. Thanking them for their service only furthers the problem. Telling them to go fuck themselves and discouraging anyone from ever signing up is how you better the world.

This might be the most offensive post I have seen here. And there are a lot of offensive posts, IMO.

It's unfortunate that wars are started by some of the worst people around, only to have troops go in to sacrifice their lives for what is essentially nothing more than a dick waving contest (I'm referencing George Carlin here). Many instances where troops didn't actually know what they were fighting for. I think the Vietnam war would be a good example of that.

AI gave me this:

"Many soldiers in World War I and the Vietnam War often felt uncertain about the reasons for their involvement, as the conflicts were marked by unclear objectives and shifting political motivations. This led to significant disillusionment among troops regarding their purpose in these wars."

[Walla Walla Dawg II]

And I don't think it is ever a good thing for organizations to have any sort of 'tribute' themed game, unless it's to the troops.

"Thank you for your service" and "Pride Month" are the same fucking thing... It's called brainwashing.

Free markets, free minds.

Troops ain't nothing but mindless welfare recipient attack dogs for war mongering psychopaths. We would be in a lot better shape if nobody signed up for that shit. Nobody should be praising anyone for mindlessly fighting wars on behalf of bankers and politicians, indiscriminately blowing shit up and killing innocent people all paid for with stolen funds. Order obeying cowards that can't think for themselves. Fighting wars on behalf of some of the most evil people in the world all for the perks. Thanking them for their service only furthers the problem. Telling them to go fuck themselves and discouraging anyone from ever signing up is how you better the world.

This might be the most offensive post I have seen here. And there are a lot of offensive posts, IMO.

I assume you mean his response to my post.

[auroraave]

"Thank you for your service" and "Pride Month" are the same fucking thing... It's called brainwashing.

Free markets, free minds.

Troops ain't nothing but mindless welfare recipient attack dogs for war mongering psychopaths. We would be in a lot better shape if nobody signed up for that shit. Nobody should be praising anyone for mindlessly fighting wars on behalf of bankers and politicians, indiscriminately blowing shit up and killing innocent people all paid for with stolen funds. Order obeying cowards that can't think for themselves. Fighting wars on behalf of some of the most evil people in the world all for the perks. Thanking them for their service only furthers the problem. Telling them to go fuck themselves and discouraging anyone from ever signing up is how you better the world.

This might be the most offensive post I have seen here. And there are a lot of offensive posts, IMO.

It's unfortunate that wars are started by some of the worst people around, only to have troops go in to sacrifice their lives for what is essentially nothing more than a dick waving contest (I'm referencing George Carlin here). Many instances where troops didn't actually know what they were fighting for. I think the Vietnam war would be a good example of that.

AI gave me this:

"Many soldiers in World War I and the Vietnam War often felt uncertain about the reasons for their involvement, as the conflicts were marked by unclear objectives and shifting political motivations. This led to significant disillusionment among troops regarding their purpose in these wars."

Wars are now about business - controlling assets - and "installed regimes" paying thier "vig" to countries like the US. It's so so so shitty. Iraq - could their be a greater example? Iraq was no real thrreat to anyone. Hussein didn't particpate in terrorism or WMD's. But Dick Cheney sure got rich(er) off of that - which is unironic when you rememebr he is the none that caused it by manipulating Young Dub.

Who rememebers the "no bid contracts" that Cheney's companies magically got to put out the Iraqi oil field fires? The only way to top that kind of blatant corruption is if he overcharged the government for thier services - which he literally did. Iran is just the latest nonsensical diversion while they steram your money and freedom. Anyone not recognizing this by now is literally retarded. The good news is many many many folks are waking up and seeing this for what it is - grifting.

Fucking. Scumbags.

[bpj]

"Thank you for your service" and "Pride Month" are the same fucking thing... It's called brainwashing.

Free markets, free minds.

Troops ain't nothing but mindless welfare recipient attack dogs for war mongering psychopaths. We would be in a lot better shape if nobody signed up for that shit. Nobody should be praising anyone for mindlessly fighting wars on behalf of bankers and politicians, indiscriminately blowing shit up and killing innocent people all paid for with stolen funds. Order obeying cowards that can't think for themselves. Fighting wars on behalf of some of the most evil people in the world all for the perks. Thanking them for their service only furthers the problem. Telling them to go fuck themselves and discouraging anyone from ever signing up is how you better the world.

This might be the most offensive post I have seen here. And there are a lot of offensive posts, IMO.

It's unfortunate that wars are started by some of the worst people around, only to have troops go in to sacrifice their lives for what is essentially nothing more than a dick waving contest (I'm referencing George Carlin here). Many instances where troops didn't actually know what they were fighting for. I think the Vietnam war would be a good example of that.

AI gave me this:

"Many soldiers in World War I and the Vietnam War often felt uncertain about the reasons for their involvement, as the conflicts were marked by unclear objectives and shifting political motivations. This led to significant disillusionment among troops regarding their purpose in these wars."

Like looking for WMD's in Iraq...

Searching caves in Afghanistan for "Osama bin Laden" after 9/11...

[douche]

Iran is just the latest nonsensical diversion while they steram your money and freedom. Anyone not recognizing this by now is literally retarded.

I wouldn't call them retarded. Just programmed. Brain washed.

The good news is many many many folks are waking up and seeing this for what it is - grifting.

Fucking. Scumbags.

100%.

Cheney and Rumsfeld are two of the worst human beings to ever inhabit this planet.

[douche]

This might be the most offensive post I have seen here. And there are a lot of offensive posts, IMO.

It's unfortunate that wars are started by some of the worst people around, only to have troops go in to sacrifice their lives for what is essentially nothing more than a dick waving contest (I'm referencing George Carlin here). Many instances where troops didn't actually know what they were fighting for. I think the Vietnam war would be a good example of that.

AI gave me this:

"Many soldiers in World War I and the Vietnam War often felt uncertain about the reasons for their involvement, as the conflicts were marked by unclear objectives and shifting political motivations. This led to significant disillusionment among troops regarding their purpose in these wars."

Like looking for WMD's in Iraq...

Searching caves in Afghanistan for "Osama bin Laden" after 9/11...

They couldn't find Osama so they made Saddam their stooge.

I remember this like it was yesterday (I'm sure most of you do as well)... every day George W. would appear on the television, telling us that they were pulling out all the stops to find bin Laden and end the war on terror. This went on every day, for a month or so. Then, overnight, he changed his tune and was telling us that they were going after Hussein. What happened? I mean, you've been telling us for a month straight that bin Laden was the bad guy.

But they got Hussein, made a mess of Iraq and, as aurora mentioned, Cheney made a boatload of money.

Those c*cksuckers should have went to prison for war crimes. Instead, they literally manipulated an entire country and made out like bandits. Talk about oversized egos.

[bpj]

It's unfortunate that wars are started by some of the worst people around, only to have troops go in to sacrifice their lives for what is essentially nothing more than a dick waving contest (I'm referencing George Carlin here). Many instances where troops didn't actually know what they were fighting for. I think the Vietnam war would be a good example of that.

AI gave me this:

"Many soldiers in World War I and the Vietnam War often felt uncertain about the reasons for their involvement, as the conflicts were marked by unclear objectives and shifting political motivations. This led to significant disillusionment among troops regarding their purpose in these wars."

Like looking for WMD's in Iraq...

Searching caves in Afghanistan for "Osama bin Laden" after 9/11...

They couldn't find Osama so they made Saddam their stooge.

I remember this like it was yesterday (I'm sure most of you do as well)... every day George W. would appear on the television, telling us that they were pulling out all the stops to find bin Laden and end the war on terror. This went on every day, for a month or so. Then, overnight, he changed his tune and was telling us that they were going after Hussein. What happened? I mean, you've been telling us for a month straight that bin Laden was the bad guy.

But they got Hussein, made a mess of Iraq and, as aurora mentioned, Cheney made a boatload of money.

Those c*cksuckers should have went to prison for war crimes. Instead, they literally manipulated an entire country and made out like bandits. Talk about oversized egos.

Here's "what happened". Netanyahu dragged us into Iraq just like he did Iran.

Link:
https://youtube.com/shorts/33vOBjMpXTo? ... BtsNp5-RVz

[Bil522]

So you think Seattle could just let the World cup go on and have it put Seattle on the map as a good sports town....but no...it's Democrats to the rescue!!! The alph SASW WE WILL BE SEEN AS THE BACKWATER LIBERAL/PROGRESSIVE HOME OF IDIOTS should be the Democrats new rallying cry:

FIFA clashes with Iran, Egypt over rainbow symbols at World Cup Pride Match

By Adam Crafton from the Athletic
June 24, 2026 Updated June 25, 2026 6:52 am PDT

The Iran Football Federation wants FIFA to prevent any “ceremonies or promotional activities” in support of the LGBTQ+ community at a much discussed “Pride Match” between Egypt and Iran on Friday in Seattle, as well as restricting symbols or representations of the Pride movement at Lumen Field.

Since Seattle was confirmed to have a June 26 World Cup fixture, the city’s host committee has been preparing activations to mark the occasion, with the match at Lumen Field fixed as Egypt vs. Iran following the draw last December. The Seattle FWC26 committee’s website has a page dedicated to the Pride Matchday and it is holding a Pride Match Day press briefing on Thursday.

FIFA told The Athletic on Wednesday it is permitting rainbow flags at all of its World Cup matches this summer.

However, the FIFA President Gianni Infantino attempted to play down the “Pride Match” branding in an interview with the Swiss newspaper Weltwoche in January. He said: “I must clarify that there will be no ‘Pride Match’ at the (FIFA) World Cup. There will be a FIFA World Cup match in Seattle, and on the same day, events organised by external organizations will be taking place in the city. But that has nothing to do with the match itself.”

In a statement to The Athletic on Wednesday night, the Iran Football Federation did not call the LGBTQ+ community by name, simply referring to it as “this movement.”

In response to an enquiry by The Athletic, a spokesperson for the Iran national team said: “The Football Federation of the Islamic Republic of Iran takes this matter seriously and has clearly communicated its position to FIFA.

“Iran and Egypt are two Muslim countries with deep cultural and religious commonalities, and the views expressed by both federations reflects the values and beliefs shared by the people of both countries.

“Our position is that no ceremonies, or promotional activities associated with this movement should be present inside the stadium or as part of the match environment. This position has been communicated to FIFA through the appropriate channels.

“We believe FIFA should take into account the views and concerns of the participating teams when considering matters related to the match environment and stadium presentation.

“FIFA has been informed of this shared position by both countries and is expected to take the necessary steps to ensure that no related ceremonies or promotional activities take place within the stadium or as part of the official match environment.”

Seattle's plans to celebrate its LGBTQ+ community coincide with a group-stage fixture between two countries that criminalize homosexuality
The spokesperson added that the Iranian federation has relayed to FIFA that it does not wish to see symbols or representations of the “movement” within the stadium.

In a statement on Wednesday to The Athletic, FIFA said it considers this World Cup to be an “inclusive event” and added that “rainbow flags and other flags representing sexual orientation and gender identity are permitted under the FIFA World Cup 2026 Stadium Code of Conduct.”

The branding by Seattle organizers — with its committee having representation on its board from executives from Seattle Reign FC of the NWSL, MLS team Seattle Sounders FC, the Seattle Sports Commission, and the NFL’s Seattle Seahawks, as well as Sounders owner Adrian Hanauer — of the “Pride Match” was decided in advance of the World Cup draw being made in December.

FIFA’s central headquarters did not have a role in the Pride initiative, which was conceived by the Seattle host committee, and it is not clear what has actually been planned within the stadium itself for matchday.

The local host committees do not have the power or scope to impose initiatives inside tournament venues, as all World Cup programming is led by FIFA’s centrally. According to sources familiar with the planning, the main programming planned by the Seattle host committee is intended to be outside of the stadium perimeter, which is not under FIFA’s jurisdiction. As of Wednesday evening, the Seattle host committee did not set out any in-stadium activation, but local soccer fans in Seattle may wish to bring rainbow flags in on the occasion of Pride weekend.

The broad-brush description of a Pride Match back in December, widely reported by global media, appeared to give the impression that there would be an organized Pride feature in Lumen Field.

As such, when the group-stage fixture schedule was confirmed, the Seattle committee encountered a predicament: the Pride Match was suddenly Egypt vs. Iran, meaning a celebration of the LGBTQ+ community as shoulder programming for a game involving two nations that criminalize same-sex relations. This immediately triggered a backlash from the soccer federations of Egypt and Iran, both of whom immediately sought to halt any link to Pride events.


, as well as same-sex sexual activity, and ultimately imposes a maximum penalty of death under its penal code. , with provisions for prison sentences and fines.

The Iranian Football Federation was critical in December. , told local news agency ISNA both his country and Egypt had raised “objections against the issue”. He described it as “an irrational move that supports a certain group.”

In a post on the Egyptian Football Association’s X account and statement on its website, it said it would refuse “the holding of any activities related to supporting homosexuality” during the game with Iran.

The association added it sent an official letter to FIFA secretary general Mattias Grafstrom to say it had been made aware of the local committee’s planning to hold “some activities related to supporting homosexuality during that match, and that they (Egyptian FA) completely refuse these activities, which directly contradicts with the cultural, religious and social values in the region, especially in the Arabic and Islamic communities”.

For several months, FIFA remained cautious in its messaging on the matter, initially refusing to comment, with Seattle local organizers refusing to back down on the branding around the game.

In a report published this week, Hedda McLendon of Seattle’s World Cup organizing committee told Kiro7 news channel that “one of the things that makes us unique is our culture of inclusion.” She said that Egypt and Iran are “just two of 65 countries around the world that criminalizes homosexuality and there is an opportunity for everybody to do better when it comes to LGBTQ inclusion.”

The Athletic was told recently by sources familiar with the talks, who asked to remain anonymous to protect relationships, that there were some even some attempts in the lead-up to the World Cup by the two federations (Egypt and Iran) to ensure that all Pride-related branding around the game and across FIFA-related touch points across the city be removed altogether — an ask which FIFA did not agree to, such was the desire of the host committee and local Seattle politicians and organizers to press ahead.

FIFA added in its statement Wednesday: “The FIFA World Cup 2026 is an inclusive event that welcomes people from all backgrounds. Fans of all sexual orientations and gender identities are welcome at matches and events.

“General statements of human rights, including rainbow flags and other flags representing sexual orientation and gender identity, are permitted under the FIFA World Cup 2026 Stadium Code of Conduct and may be displayed inside stadiums provided they are used in a manner consistent with the code.”

The Egyptian FA has been approached for comment.

[DavidGee24]

Why the hell anyone would even want to make a soccer match about homosexuality is beyond comprehension. You can't just go and enjoy the game? To make it be about your sexual orientation is just being a self-important asshole.

Although it would be funny if you were playing against a Muslim country and when they get a penalty kick have the male fans behind the goal wave rainbows and blow kisses at the shooter.