Who will win the presidential election

[IStillLoveTheMs]

You're trusting the same people that told you Trump colluded with Russia and peed on hookers.

You want us to take you seriously for quoting the people who need to cover their tracks?

You libs are hopeless. Just go bury your head until January 20th.

Of course... that's when you'll really want to start burying it after you see Trumps victory rally.

You're the maniacs making the claim that there's horrific voter fraud running rampant in every state across the country.

If Trump's legal team can't come up with any evidence to sway judges... what makes you think you're any brighter?

Whenever somebody asks you to face the facts you immediately jump to... "you'll see!" "your head is buried in sand!" "what's really going on..."

No... I'm looking at what's really going on and judges across the country think Trump's attempt to overthrow the result of the election is an enormous joke. Are the judges laughing at Trump the same people that told me Trump colluded with Russia and peed on hookers? Nope. They're the people telling you Trump has no case.

[HawkBowler 2.0]

"In Pennsylvania, Trump's lawyers had suggested their poll observers had been shut out of the locations where ballots were being counted. So when the lawyers acknowledged that the observers had, in fact, been permitted within 15 feet of the poll workers, U.S. District Judge Paul Diamond, appointed by then-President George W. Bush, appeared baffled."

"I'm sorry, then what's your problem?" Diamond chirped.

Maybe you have eagle vision, but most people can't see the ballots from 15 feet away. That's not the meaningful access that the law requires.

As we know, the left has judges in their pockets. The battle doesn't stop with Judge Diamond.

You dismissed what has now become hundreds of affidavits as just hearsay. Again, that's incorrect. Those people are eyewitnesses. If they lie they can go to jail.

[Coeurd’Alene J]

Update on the supposed raid in Germany

This morning Larry Johnson, former CIA analyst, has weighed in with a thought provoking account in which he claims he was "reliably informed" of what he says--presumably by former colleagues: Unraveling the Deep State Coup. (h/t "j") I refer you to the full blog for all details, but here's the short version.

The core of Johnson's account is that the servers in question were not owned by private companies: Dominion or Scytl, or anyone else. Rather, they were owned by CIA.


That, of course, would put an entirely different light on the legalities that would have been in play. If the Scytl facility were US government property, and if the personnel effecting the seizure of the servers were proceeding in accordance with valid orders, there would have been no need for German government involvement. Here's how Johnson puts that:



I am reliably informed that a unit under the command of USEUCOM (i.e., United States European Command) did in fact conduct an operation to take control of computer servers. But these servers belong to the CIA, not Dominion or Sctyl. The U.S. military has full authority to do this because any CIA activity in the European theater is being conducted using military cover. In other words, CIA officers would be identified to the German government (and anyone else asking) as military employees or consultants.

And cia Halpern and fbi Wray were not informed of any of this

[IStillLoveTheMs]

"In Pennsylvania, Trump's lawyers had suggested their poll observers had been shut out of the locations where ballots were being counted. So when the lawyers acknowledged that the observers had, in fact, been permitted within 15 feet of the poll workers, U.S. District Judge Paul Diamond, appointed by then-President George W. Bush, appeared baffled."

"I'm sorry, then what's your problem?" Diamond chirped.

Maybe you have eagle vision, but most people can't see the ballots from 15 feet away. That's not the meaningful access that the law requires.

As we know, the left has judges in their pockets. The battle doesn't stop with Judge Diamond.

You dismissed what has now become hundreds of affidavits as just hearsay. Again, that's incorrect. Those people are eyewitnesses. If they lie they can go to jail.

Yeah and the judge laughed at the claim.

The affidavits are being laughed at... I'm not the one dismissing them. The judges are. They think the testimony is a joke. There's nothing credible according to them... why should I think otherwise?

[bpj]

We'll see January 20th!

Can't wait!

[HawkBowler 2.0]

Sydney Powell, Trump's attorney, said the same thing -- the CIA is running the digital cheat operation.

What can be done if both the FBI and the CIA are working against Trump? The left controls both the domestic and international modes of investigation.

If things worked as planned after the raid in Germany, the DOJ should now have the servers and code for the operation.

Powell says that some states will be flipping back to Trump in the near future. That's because they've identified the votes that were switched, when and where. And according to her it's not even close -- states will flip by hundreds of thousands of votes. Over 2.7 million switched votes have been identified by IT professionals and statisticians online. We can be sure that the White House has even more information at this point. They also have three whistle blowers from Dominion.

The question for Trump is how do you take down the CIA, FBI, MSM, Big Tech and the Democrats all at the same time? Also who does the cuffing? US Marshal? The Army? i would settle for ICE at this point. Start making arrests and return our country to some semblance of truth.

[HawkBowler 2.0]

The affidavits are being laughed at... I'm not the one dismissing them. The judges are. They think the testimony is a joke. There's nothing credible according to them... why should I think otherwise?

Have you read any of affidavits? They run the gammot of all kinds of fraud. Counting ballots after observers are told to go home. Running the same batch of votes through the machine multiple times. People switching votes. Read the affidavits. Do you really believe that hundreds of people are all going to tell similar lies?

[bpj]

I'm sure we should just trust what ISLTM has to say like he trusts his tv box.

[IStillLoveTheMs]

The affidavits are being laughed at... I'm not the one dismissing them. The judges are. They think the testimony is a joke. There's nothing credible according to them... why should I think otherwise?

Have you read any of affidavits? They run the gammot of all kinds of fraud. Counting ballots after observers are told to go home. Running the same batch of votes through the machine multiple times. People switching votes. Read the affidavits. Do you really believe that hundreds of people are all going to tell similar lies?

1. Says you. Says the maniacal Trump supporters who claim these things happen. Crazy people say all kinds of things... it's up to the judges to decide if they're credible... and they're saying no every step of the way.

2. Yes. I absolutely do. I think the people coming forward are insane or the people imploring them them to provide a false affidavit (Project Veritas for example) have a a clear agenda.

[bpj]