Elon Musk puts his money where his mouth is
Re: Elon Musk puts his money where his mouth is
We can always hope! Imagine what that would do to social media!
Re: Elon Musk puts his money where his mouth is
F-ing Legend!Donn Beach wrote: ↑Wed Apr 13, 2022 12:25 pmIt's interesting to speculate what he might do, everybody hanging on his next move. Could buy the entire company rather easily if he wanted
https://finance.yahoo.com/news/elon-mus ... 23351.html
dt
- Donn Beach
- Posts: 13379
- Joined: Thu May 02, 2019 1:06 am
Re: Elon Musk puts his money where his mouth is
Yeah, came here to brag, talk about calling it lol
- Sibelius Hindemith
- Posts: 11418
- Joined: Thu May 02, 2019 3:09 am
- Location: Seattle
Re: Elon Musk puts his money where his mouth is
If i bought Twitter i would make all the employees attend a seminar where they get taught about the Constitution and Bill of Rights and then have to pass a test afterwards to show they understand those things. And i would identify all the leftist fucks in the upper ranks and send them packing.
- seattlefan-daBronx
- Posts: 12687
- Joined: Wed May 01, 2019 9:37 pm
Re: Elon Musk puts his money where his mouth is
The Twitter board of execs if Elon buys the company....
Pronouns: Kiss/My/Ass
- Donn Beach
- Posts: 13379
- Joined: Thu May 02, 2019 1:06 am
Re: Elon Musk puts his money where his mouth is
I don't see where this has anything to do with freedom of speech. All musk would be doing is deciding the rules for his business as opposed to how they were decided before he bought it. It's like kicking someone out of your house for swearing or not mind the swearing. There is no freedom of speech involvedSibelius Hindemith wrote: ↑Thu Apr 14, 2022 2:23 pmIf i bought Twitter i would make all the employees attend a seminar where they get taught about the Constitution and Bill of Rights and then have to pass a test afterwards to show they understand those things. And i would identify all the leftist fucks in the upper ranks and send them packing.
- Donn Beach
- Posts: 13379
- Joined: Thu May 02, 2019 1:06 am
Re: Elon Musk puts his money where his mouth is
There wouldn't be a board of directors, it be privately ownedseattlefan-daBronx wrote: ↑Thu Apr 14, 2022 3:09 pmThe Twitter board of execs if Elon buys the company....
Twitter Board.jpg
- seattlefan-daBronx
- Posts: 12687
- Joined: Wed May 01, 2019 9:37 pm
Re: Elon Musk puts his money where his mouth is
Don, so how come they made such a big deal about him being on the "board"?Donn Beach wrote: ↑Thu Apr 14, 2022 5:03 pmThere wouldn't be a board of directors, it be privately ownedseattlefan-daBronx wrote: ↑Thu Apr 14, 2022 3:09 pmThe Twitter board of execs if Elon buys the company....
Twitter Board.jpg
You sound busy savvy. Then he decided not to be.
https://fortune.com/2022/04/11/why-did- ... ter-board/
Pronouns: Kiss/My/Ass
- Donn Beach
- Posts: 13379
- Joined: Thu May 02, 2019 1:06 am
Re: Elon Musk puts his money where his mouth is
I take that back, a privately held corporation would still have a board, but it certainly wouldn't be hostile towards Musk as the companies sole stockholder.
Twitter Currently is a publicly held business, Musk is just one of who knows how many shareholders. The boards duty is to look after the interests of all the shareholders. If Musk was to buy the company outright, that is, take it private then that be only him. He would have his own board
In terms of the article, it didn't really make sense for him to be on the board. He was there supposedly to look after the interests of all the shareholders, mocking the company could be viewed as a conflict with his duties.
That's the thing, far as I know, Twitter never tried to ban him or anything, he wasn't in conflict with Twitter. It was the SEC that would ride his ass.
Twitter Currently is a publicly held business, Musk is just one of who knows how many shareholders. The boards duty is to look after the interests of all the shareholders. If Musk was to buy the company outright, that is, take it private then that be only him. He would have his own board
In terms of the article, it didn't really make sense for him to be on the board. He was there supposedly to look after the interests of all the shareholders, mocking the company could be viewed as a conflict with his duties.
That's the thing, far as I know, Twitter never tried to ban him or anything, he wasn't in conflict with Twitter. It was the SEC that would ride his ass.