You two are both crazy and don't understand libertarian logic.gil wrote: ↑Tue Feb 14, 2023 3:33 pmThis is an interesting analogy I hadn't thought of.Donn Beach wrote: ↑Tue Feb 14, 2023 5:52 amIf you're a libertarian type there isn't a problem in the first place is there? What's up with trying to restrict where someone can live. If we are allowing rich ranchers to graze their cattle on public land in Montana, seems like we should be allowing poor people to camp on public land in Seattle. Just quit trying to pass laws about it and the problem is solved isn't it
Following along on what you are describing as libertarian logic, we can then stop spending taxpayer money on the homeless problem.
And if you (a non-homeless person) feel threatened, hire private security. And if you don't like people camping on public land, buy your own private park.
Simple.
Libertarian logic states that as long as my rights are not being affected, and your rights are not being affected, there isn't a problem.
Allowing the homeless to sleep wherever they want can cause an issue......if they sleep on government land, let's say a park, what happens to your children when they walk through that park on their way to school?
Please remember that your rights go only as far as my rights.