The New Election Interference Strategy

[Cascade Kid]

Imagine a US State, a liberal US State, that files a lawsuit to bar former President Donald Trump from being on the State's primary ballot for allegedly supporting an insurrection. This is actually happening in Colorado, a liberal state, just 6 months prior to Colorado's GOP primary.
-

https://komonews.com/news/nation-world/ ... mug-shot#
-

Now imagine the possibilities of other liberal US States filing similar lawsuits, within this same timeline. A timeline that may allow a liberal judge to rule, and little time for an injunction or summary judgement to pause or overrule the former judgement.

This could very well be the next-level election interference we should speak out against. Branches of government breaking the People's right to vote for another candidate prior to an election, and prior to any finding of guilt against a candidate.

It has become very extreme on how diabolical politics have become. This is like shooting a person in broad daylight in a restaurant, then sits down to have lunch at the next table, and half the people thinks this behavior is fine or supports it.

[Walla Walla Dawg II]

Imagine a US State, a liberal US State, that files a lawsuit to bar former President Donald Trump from being on the State's primary ballot for allegedly supporting an insurrection. This is actually happening in Colorado, a liberal state, just 6 months prior to Colorado's GOP primary.
-

https://komonews.com/news/nation-world/ ... mug-shot#
-

Now imagine the possibilities of other liberal US States filing similar lawsuits, within this same timeline. A timeline that may allow a liberal judge to rule, and little time for an injunction or summary judgement to pause or overrule the former judgement.

This could very well be the next-level election interference we should speak out against. Branches of government breaking the People's right to vote for another candidate prior to an election, and prior to any finding of guilt against a candidate.

It has become very extreme on how diabolical politics have become. This is like shooting a person in broad daylight in a restaurant, then sits down to have lunch at the next table, and half the people thinks this behavior is fine or supports it.

It is very scary.

Now imagine every state doing this to the other candidate.

How many states have Republican congresses?
How many states have Democrat congresses?

It could just come to the United States electing our state congresses, then they vote for the President.
-Would be pretty shitty-

Every state would get 1 vote, no popular vote, no electoral vote.
I think we would have a Republican President.

[Cascade Kid]

I'm pointing out the potential strategy here. Because there's a process to things and the libs don't want to let it playout, even if things fall to their favor. They are literally attempting to assure Trump does not get elected before his trial ends.

The proper process would be to let the trial and election playout. If Trump is elected and later found guilty, there is an impeachment process I'm sure Congress and the Senate would show enough bipartisan support for.

But this election interference tactic is intersecting any logical process and taking disruptive control over the People and the process. It's once again, liberal controlled states finding ways to control people and their decisions thinking they know better than the people do. Geez, sounds like a recent song that went viral on YouTube recently.

[ddraig]

That's one thing the Dims haven't yet figured out. What happens of the Republicans begin to use the same tactics the Dims have been using for years? Free Speech? Not for liberal Marxists. Right to bear arms? Not to liberal Marxists. Start sending ANTIFA and BKM terrorists to 20 - 30 year prison sentences. Defunding freebies to illegal aliens. The list can go on. They don't seem to realize it doesn't take much for things to flip against them.

[Cascade Kid]

Just remember, this is what Trump really said on Jan. 6.

I know your pain. I know you're hurt. I know you're hurt, I know your pain. I know you're hurt. We had an election that was stolen from us. It was a landslide election and everyone knows it, especially the other side. But you have to go home now. We have to have peace. We have to have law and order. We have to respect our great people in law and order. We don't want anybody hurt. It's a very tough period of time. There's never been a time like this where such a thing happened where they could take it away from all of us, from me, from you, from our country. This was a fraudulent election. But we can't play into the hands of these people. We have to have peace. So go home, we love you. You're very special. You've seen what happens. You see the way others are treated that are so bad and so evil. I know how you feel, but go home and go home at peace.

-
https://www.c-span.org/video/?507774-1/ ... protesters

[douche]

Don't like something? Institute a new law. Or submit a bill and have it fast-tracked to suit the cause.

It's plainly obvious that politics is nothing more than organized crime. Only better. Because under the guise of politics, nothing is illegal.

“It is not power that corrupts, but fear. Fear of losing power corrupts those who wield it.”

― Aung San Suu Kyi, Freedom from Fear

[Donn Beach]

Imagine a US State, a liberal US State, that files a lawsuit to bar former President Donald Trump from being on the State's primary ballot for allegedly supporting an insurrection. This is actually happening in Colorado, a liberal state, just 6 months prior to Colorado's GOP primary.
-

https://komonews.com/news/nation-world/ ... mug-shot#
-

Now imagine the possibilities of other liberal US States filing similar lawsuits, within this same timeline. A timeline that may allow a liberal judge to rule, and little time for an injunction or summary judgement to pause or overrule the former judgement.

This could very well be the next-level election interference we should speak out against. Branches of government breaking the People's right to vote for another candidate prior to an election, and prior to any finding of guilt against a candidate.

It has become very extreme on how diabolical politics have become. This is like shooting a person in broad daylight in a restaurant, then sits down to have lunch at the next table, and half the people thinks this behavior is fine or supports it.

The state didn't file the law suit, it's a private organization the same as the conservative Judicial Watch which files their own law suits. It has nothing to do with Colorado, it's about the US Constitution, the 14th amendment. It's part of the American legal system

The lawsuit, citing the 14th Amendment, is likely the initial step in a legal challenge that seems destined for the U.S. Supreme Court. It was filed on behalf of six Republican and unaffiliated Colorado voters by the group Citizens for Ethics and Responsibility in Washington

Its a constitutional question, it end up being decided by the supreme court, doubt it gets anywhere

[Donn Beach]

Maybe it could get somewhere, this is from the Federalist Society. We have an originalist leaning supreme court these days

“We thought: ‘We’re constitutional scholars, and this is an important constitutional question. We ought to figure out what’s really going on here.’ And the more we dug into it,” he said, “the more we realized that we had something to add.”

What they added were 126 pages of airtight argument, from a conservative, originalist perspective, for the case to disqualify Trump. Federalist Society co-founder Steven G. Calabresi lauded it as “a tour de force.”

Yet making that case and enforcing it are two separate things. As a like-minded constitutional expert, Mark A. Graber, wrote in an earlier and shorter dive into Section 3, “The only question that remains is whether — and how — that will happen.”

Baude and Paulsen say the enforcers should be “anyone whose job it is to figure out whether someone is legally qualified” to hold office and to be included on state ballots — that is, state election administrators, typically the secretaries of state.

Which is exactly what the lawsuit is about

[DanielVogelbach]

There are two major issues used to rope people into this bullshit...

#1 - Election Fraud - What the conservatives bitch about (obviously it's all fraud, lol)


#2 - Voter discrimination - what the liberals bitch about (making it difficult for minorities to vote, etc.)


These seem like separate issues, but they are the same thing. They are both 100% pure horse shit. They are fake, distraction narratives designed to get any person on any side focused on elections and their importance. In reality, there's not many things that will have less impact on your life than who gets voted into oval office. It carries the same weight as rooting for the Mariners or Seahawks. When they win, nothing happens. You can celebrate all day long, but it's just the same league doing whatever they want. The only thing that changes the course of government is how much the people obey and comply with their rulers. Voting is obedience.

[Mel Bradford]

Hate to break it to the Constitutional scholars, but Donald Trump has not been convicted of anything.

The 14th Amendment Disqualifications clause is a tool of Congress. It doesn't even touch on state civil court jurisdiction.

This is idiocy upon idiocy.

As for the state of Colorado, a Judge cannot alter the ballot. There is no finding for the Secretary of state, Even the state legislature and the Governor cannot tamper with Federal election law.

It amounts to a heaping pile of horse pucky.